Tumors arising from the liver, biliary tract and pancreas, which originate in the foregut and are in close anatomical proximity to each other, sometimes show similar histological features. No studies have focused on genetic similarities and differences between tumors of these organs. To elucidate the similarities and differences in DNA copy number alterations between tumors of these organs, we applied comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to cancers of the liver (31 cases), biliary tract (42 cases) and pancreas (27 cases). Some alterations were common to tumors of all three organs, and some were preferential in certain types of tumor. Gains of 1q and 8q and losses of 8p and 17p were common to all tumors. In contrast, 13q14 and 16q losses were detected exclusively in hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs; p < 0.01). The incidence of 17q21 gain and 5q loss was higher in biliary tract cancers than in the other two types (p < 0.05). Pancreatic cancers exhibited higher incidence of 5q14-q23 gain and 19p loss than tumors of other organs (p < 0.01). Gains of 7p, 7q, 12p and 20q and losses of 3p, 6q, 9p and 18q were frequent in both biliary tract and pancreatic cancers but rare in HCCs (p < 0.05). The present results suggest that although genes located at 1q, 8p, 8q and 17p are frequently involved in HCC, biliary tract and pancreatic cancer, at least some of the genes implicated in carcinogenesis are different between these three types. It is also suggested that CGH analysis is useful as a potential adjunct for the diagnosis and management of these tumors of organs that are anatomically close to one another.

Endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy has been developed as a new method of treatment of chronic pancreatitis in our institution since 1982. We introduced pancreatic sphincterotomy as a safe technique, after performing it successfully in 21 cases of chronic pancreatitis without any complications, and relieving both abdominal and back pain in 19 of the cases. Recently, we have added endoscopic elimination of viscid pancreatic juice including protein plugs. This report describes our procedure of pancreatic sphincterotomy in detail, and evaluates it in the endoscopic treatment of chronic pancreatitis.

After our introduction of endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy for treatment of chronic pancreatitis in 1985, our interest has been focused to the value of pure pancreatic juice collection with or without pancreatic sphincterotomy for management of chronic pancreatitis. Through pancreatic sphincterotomy, pain relief was obtained in 13 out of 16 cases with moderate and marked chronic pancreatitis. After pancreatic sphincterotomy extraction of pancreatic calculi using basket forceps was done successfully in 2 of these cases, Spontaneous stone passage occured in the other 2. In pure pancreatic juice collection without pancreatic sphincterotomy, pain relief was seen in 6 out of 13 cases with mild and moderate chronic pancreatitis. The protein plug was simultaneously aspirated during the procedure in 3 cases. Recently, we have indicated in these patients both pancreatic sphincterotomy and pure pancreatic juice collection and noted pain relief was obtained in all of the 8 cases with this approach. With an improvement in the technology of pancreatic drainage, these endoscopic treatment modalities may be possibly useful to stop the progression of chronic pancreatitis.