Living cells are crowded with macromolecules and organelles, which affect a myriad of biochemical processes. As a result, there is a need for sensitive molecular sensors for quantitative, site-specific assessment of macromolecular crowding. Here, we investigated the excited-state dynamics of recently developed hetero-FRET sensors (mCerulean3–linker–mCitrine) in homogeneous and heterogeneous environments using time-resolved fluorescence measurements, which are compatible with fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM). The linker in these FRET constructs, which tether the mCerulean3 (the donor) and mCitrine (the acceptor), vary in both length and flexibility. Glycerol and Ficoll-70 solutions were used for homogeneous and heterogeneous environments, respectively, at variable concentrations. The wavelength-dependent studies suggest that the 425-nm excitation and the 475-nm emission of the donor are best suited for quantitative assessment of the energy transfer efficiency and the donor-acceptor distance of these FRET probes. Under the same experimental conditions, the enzymatically cleaved counterpart of these probes was used as a control as well as a means to account for the changes in the environmental refractive indices. Our results indicate that the energy transfer efficiency of these FRET probes increases as the linker becomes shorter and more flexible in pure buffer at room temperature. In addition, the FRET probes favor a compact structure with enhanced energy transfer efficiency and a shorter donor-acceptor distance in the heterogeneous, polymer-crowded environment due to steric hindrance. In contrast, the stretched conformation of these FRET probes is more favorable in the viscous, homogeneous environment with a reduced energy transfer efficiency and relatively larger donor-acceptor distance as compared with those in pure buffer, which was attributed to a reduced structural fluctuation of the mCerulean3–mCitrine FRET pair in the viscous, more restrictive glycerol-enriched buffer. Our findings will help to advance the potential of these hetero-FRET probes using FLIM for spatio-temporal assessment of the compartmentalized crowding in living cells.

Macromolecular crowding is prevalent in all living cells due to the presence of large biomolecules and organelles. Cellular crowding is heterogeneous and is known to influence biomolecular transport, biochemical reactions, and protein folding. Emerging evidence suggests that some cell pathologies may be correlated with compartmentalized crowding. As a result, there is a need for robust biosensors that are sensitive to crowding as well as quantitative, noninvasive fluorescence methods that are compatible with living cells studies. Here, we have developed a model that describes the rotational dynamics of hetero-Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) biosensors as a means to determine the energy-transfer efficiency and donor–acceptor distance. The model was tested on wavelength-dependent time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy of hetero-FRET probes (mCerulean3–linker–mCitrine) with variable linkers in both crowded (Ficoll-70) and viscous (glycerol) solutions at room temperature. Our results indicate that the energy-transfer efficiencies of these FRET probes increase as the linker becomes shorter and more flexible in pure buffer at room temperature. In addition, the FRET probes favor compact structures with enhanced energy-transfer efficiencies and a shorter donor–acceptor distance in the heterogeneous, polymer-crowded environment due to steric hindrance. In contrast, the extended conformation of these FRET probes is more favorable in viscous, homogeneous environments with a reduced energy-transfer efficiency compared to those in pure buffer, which we attribute to reduced structural fluctuations of the mCerulean3–mCitrine FRET pair in the glycerol-enriched buffer. Our results represent an important step toward the application of quantitative and noninvasive time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy of hetero-FRET probes to investigate compartmentalized macromolecular crowding and protein–protein interactions in living cells as well as in controlled environments.

Living cells are complex, crowded, and dynamic and continually respond to environmental and intracellular stimuli. They also have heterogeneous ionic strength with compartmentalized variations in both intracellular concentrations and types of ions. These challenges would benefit from the development of quantitative, noninvasive approaches for mapping the heterogeneous ionic strength fluctuations in living cells. Here, we investigated a class of recently developed ionic strength sensors that consists of mCerulean3 (a cyan fluorescent protein) and mCitrine (a yellow fluorescent protein) tethered via a linker made of two charged α-helices and a flexible loop. The two helices are designed to bear opposite charges, which is hypothesized to increase the ionic screening and therefore a larger intermolecular distance. In these protein constructs, mCerulean3 and mCitrine act as a donor–acceptor pair undergoing Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) that is dependent on both the linker amino acids and the environmental ionic strength. Using time-resolved fluorescence of the donor (mCerulean3), we determined the sensitivity of the energy transfer efficiencies and the donor–acceptor distances of these sensors at variable concentrations of the Hofmeister series of salts (KCl, LiCl, NaCl, NaBr, NaI, Na2SO4). As controls, similar measurements were carried out on the FRET-incapable, enzymatically cleaved counterparts of these sensors as well as a construct designed with two electrostatically neutral α-helices (E6G2). Our results show that the energy transfer efficiencies of these sensors are sensitive to both the linker amino acid sequence and the environmental ionic strength, whereas the sensitivity of these sensors to the identity of the dissolved ions of the Hofmeister series of salts seems limited. We also developed a theoretical framework to explain the observed trends as a function of the ionic strength in terms of the Debye screening of the electrostatic interaction between the two charged α-helices in the linker region. These controlled solution studies represent an important step toward the development of rationally designed FRET-based environmental sensors while offering different models for calculating the energy transfer efficiency using time-resolved fluorescence that is compatible with future in vivo studies.

important to note that since most of the represented in 1 is proof-of-concept, acquisition times and power values may differ significantly when these techniques are applied to actual systems of interest. For example, Choi et al. point out that a depletion power of 2 TW cm −2 is incompatible with biological material. However, less efficient depletion will still allow them to see improvements in resolution. 63 The results and simulations discussed here represent promising steps toward this goal and toward offering alternative microscopy options to fluorescence-based methods.

Biological and material samples contain nanoscale heterogeneities that are unresolvable with conventional microscopy techniques. Super-resolution fluorescence methods can break the optical diffraction limit to observe these features, but they require samples to be fluorescently labeled. Over the past decade, progress has been made toward developing super-resolution techniques that do not require the use of labels. These label-free techniques span a variety of different approaches, including structured illumination, transient absorption, infrared absorption, and coherent Raman spectroscopies. Many draw inspiration from widely successful fluorescence-based techniques such as stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy, photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM), and stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). In this review, we discuss the progress made in these fields along with the current challenges and prospects in reaching resolutions comparable to those achieved with fluorescence-based methods. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry Volume 15 is June 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.