Aims
The present study is aimed to reveal the variations in epiphytic microbial composition among six whole crop corn (WCC) varieties and their contributions on ensiling characteristics and microbial composition of WCC silage.
Methods and Results
Six WCC varieties (JS06, YS23, BS20, JS39, JS40 and JS26) were ensiled for 90 days. All WCC varieties were well fermented with low pH value (<4·0) and high LA (73·6–124 g kg−1 DM, dry matter) concentration. Of six varieties, JS40 had the highest LA (124 g kg−1 DM) concentration, which was supported by highest relative abundance of Lactobacillus. Pantoea was the most dominant epiphytic bacteria in all fresh WCC varieties; however, the secondary dominant genera among six WCC were absolutely difference. Lactobacillus became predominant genus in 90‐day silages except YS23. YS23 kept the more bacterial genus from fresh to 90‐day silages than other silages, meanwhile Acinetobacter and Enterobacter were the dominant bacteria in YS23 silages.
Conclusions
Among six WCC varieties, JS40 silage had the highest LA. The variations in epiphytic microbiomes among fresh WCC affected terminal microbial community of 90‐day silages. There were differences in fermentation characteristics among six WCC varieties, which might be partly attributed to variations in epiphytic microbiomes among fresh WCC.
Significance and Impact of the Study
The study not only enriches the research on microbial communities of plant phyllosphere but also provides theoretical basis for selecting WCC varieties and inoculants for the forage production.
Background: The emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance are a significant threat to global health. Silage is a major forage feed for ruminants, and its safety is an important guarantee that high-quality ruminant products will remain available to humans. However, little attention has been given to the silage resistome. To define the antibiotic resistome and its potential risk to silage from different climate zones and in response to the ensiling process, this study used metagenomics to investigate bacterial communities and the type and amount of antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) in corn silage harvested from six climate zones (Cfa, BWk, Dwc, Dwa, BSk, and Aw based on Köppen-Geiger climate classification) in China. Results: The composition and succession of silage bacterial communities varied significantly between different climate zones. Lactobacillus was the predominant bacteria during corn ensiling. A total of 134 ARGs were observed in corn silage, with the dominant classes being beta-lactamase and multidrug resistance and the primary mechanisms being efflux pump, inactivation, and target protection. Differences in the resistome were mainly attributed to disparities in microbial composition, which was indirectly affected by climatic factors and fermentation pH. ARG abundance was lower in 90-day silages than 5-day silages except in Hainan silage. The diversity and relative abundance (0.65-0.4% based on total gene number) of ARGs was lower in silage microbiota from Tibet than other climate zones. The dominant ARGs were tetM, oqxB, lmrD, lnuA, ermB, and tetS, and Enterobacter, Klebsiella, Staphylococcus, Lactobacillus and Lactococcus were the primary ARG hosts. Eleven high-risk ARGs were chosen to evaluate the pollution level of silages harvested from different climate zones. The highest relative abundance of high-risk ARGs belonging to Lactobacillus occurred in corn silages from Cfa, Dwa and BWk climate zones. Conclusions: The ensiling process decreased ARG abundance. While resistome contamination of silage from Tibet was relatively low, ARGs with high risk were abundant in silages from Cfa, Dwa and BWk climate zones.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.