Among patients with severe obesity followed up for a median of 6.5 years, bariatric surgery compared with medical treatment was associated with a clinically important increased risk for complications, as well as lower risks of obesity-related comorbidities. The risk for complications should be considered in the decision-making process.

ObjectiveWeight reduction improves several obesity-related health conditions. We aimed to compare the effect of bariatric surgery and comprehensive lifestyle intervention on type 2 diabetes and obesity-related cardiovascular risk factors.DesignOne-year controlled clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00273104).MethodsMorbidly obese subjects (19–66 years, mean (s.d.) body mass index 45.1 kg/m2 (5.6), 103 women) were treated with either Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (n=80) or intensive lifestyle intervention at a rehabilitation centre (n=66). The dropout rate within both groups was 5%.ResultsAmong the 76 completers in the surgery group and the 63 completers in the lifestyle group, mean (s.d.) 1-year weight loss was 30% (8) and 8% (9) respectively. Beneficial effects on glucose metabolism, blood pressure, lipids and low-grade inflammation were observed in both groups. Remission rates of type 2 diabetes and hypertension were significantly higher in the surgery group than the lifestyle intervention group; 70 vs 33%, P=0.027, and 49 vs 23%, P=0.016. The improvements in glycaemic control and blood pressure were mediated by weight reduction. The surgery group experienced a significantly greater reduction in the prevalence of metabolic syndrome, albuminuria and electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy than the lifestyle group. Gastrointestinal symptoms and symptomatic postprandial hypoglycaemia developed more frequently after gastric bypass surgery than after lifestyle intervention. There were no deaths.ConclusionsType 2 diabetes and obesity-related cardiovascular risk factors were improved after both treatment strategies. However, the improvements were greatest in those patients treated with gastric bypass surgery.

The comparative effectiveness of various bariatric procedures on remission of type 2 diabetes remains debated. We aimed to compare the two most commonly used procedures, hypothesising higher remission rates of diabetes after gastric bypass than after sleeve gastrectomy. Methods:The Oseberg study is an ongoing triple-blind, randomised, single-centre trial taking place at Vestfold Hospital Trust, Norway. Adult patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy. Randomisation was performed with a computerised random number generator using block sizes of 10. Treatment allocation was concealed using sealed opaque envelopes, and was masked from participants, study personnel and outcome assessors. Primary outcomes were, first, the proportion of participants with complete remission of diabetes; glycated haemoglobin 6•0% (42 mmol/mol) or less with no diabetes medication, and, second, beta-cell function modelled from an intravenous glucose tolerance test at one year. Analyses were performed according to intention-to-treat and per-protocol principles. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier: NCT01778738.

The impact of gastric bypass on atorvastatin pharmacokinetics was investigated in 12 morbidly obese patients being treated with 20-80 mg atorvastatin each morning. Eight-hour pharmacokinetic investigations were performed the day before the surgery and at a median of 5 weeks (range 3-6 weeks) after the surgery. Gastric bypass surgery produced a variable effect on individual systemic exposure to atorvastatin acid (area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve from 0 to 8 h postdose (AUC(0-8))), ranging from a threefold decrease to a twofold increase (median ratio = 1.1, P = 0.99). Patients with the highest systemic exposure to atorvastatin before surgery showed reduced exposure after surgery (n = 3, median ratio = 0.4, range = 0.3-0.5, P < 0.01), whereas those with lower systemic exposure before surgery showed a median 1.2-fold increase in atorvastatin AUC(0-8) (n = 9, range = 0.8-2.3, P = 0.03) after surgery. This study indicates that the presurgical first-pass metabolic capacity influences the effect of gastric bypass on atorvastatin bioavailability. Because individual first-pass metabolic capacity is not readily assessable clinically, retitration up to the lowest effective dose should be performed after the surgery.

Individual variability in expression and function of organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1), multidrug resistance protein 1 (MDR1), and/or cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) may impact the clinical response of many drugs. We investigated the correlation between expression of these proteins and pharmacokinetics of atorvastatin, a substrate of all three, in 21 obese patients with paired biopsies from liver and intestinal segments. The patients were also screened for the SLCO1B1 c.521T→C variant alleles. Approximately 30% (r(2) = 0.28) of the variation in oral clearance (CL/F) of atorvastatin was explained by hepatic OATP1B1 protein expression (P = 0.041). Patients carrying the SLCO1B1 c.521C variant allele (homozygous, n = 4; heterozygous, n = 2) exhibited 45% lower CL/F of atorvastatin than the c.521TT carriers (P = 0.067). No association between hepatic and intestinal expression of MDR1 or CYP3A4 and atorvastatin pharmacokinetics was found (P > 0.149). In conclusion, this study suggests that OATP1B1 phenotype is more important than CYP3A4 and MDR1 phenotypes for the individual pharmacokinetic variability of atorvastatin.

Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch is a combined restrictive and malabsorptive surgical weight loss procedure. Given that this procedure introduces a bypass of the proximal small intestine, it is a suitable model for investigating the influence of the proximal intestine on drug bioavailability. Eight-hour pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained the day before surgery and again after surgery at (median) 6 weeks (range, 4-8 weeks) in 10 morbidly obese patients who were receiving treatment with 20-80 mg atorvastatin each morning. The bioavailability of atorvastatin acid was significantly increased, with a mean twofold higher AUC(0-8) after surgery (range 1.0-4.2, P = 0.001). Time to maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) increased from 1.2 h before surgery to 2.3 h after surgery (P = 0.03). The results emphasize the protective nature of the proximal small intestine against ingested exogenous compounds. Consequently, retitration to the lowest effective dose should be considered after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch in the case of drugs with a high degree of intestinal first pass metabolism and a narrow therapeutic window.

Summary Anatomical changes in the gastrointestinal tract and subsequent weight loss may influence drug disposition and thus drug dosing following bariatric surgery. This review systematically examines the effects of bariatric surgery on drug pharmacokinetics, focusing especially on the mechanisms involved in restricting oral bioavailability. Studies with a longitudinal before‐after design investigating the pharmacokinetics of at least one drug were reviewed. The need for dose adjustment following bariatric surgery was examined, as well as the potential for extrapolation to other drugs subjected to coinciding pharmacokinetic mechanisms. A total of 22 original articles and 32 different drugs were assessed. The majority of available data is based on Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) (18 of 22 studies), and hence, the overall interpretation is more or less limited to RYGBP. In the case of the majority of studied drugs, an increased absorption rate was observed early after RYGBP. The effect on systemic exposure allows for a low degree of extrapolation, including between drugs subjected to the same major metabolic and transporter pathways. On the basis of current understanding, predicting the pharmacokinetic change for a specific drug following RYGBP is challenging. Close monitoring of each individual drug is therefore recommended in the early postsurgical phase. Future studies should focus on the long‐term effects of bariatric surgery on drug disposition, and they should also aim to disentangle the effects of the surgery itself and the subsequent weight loss.

Obesity is associated with comorbidities of which pharmacological treatment is needed. Physiological changes associated with obesity may influence the pharmacokinetics of drugs, but the effect of body weight on drug metabolism capacity remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate ex vivo activities of hepatic drug metabolizing CYP enzymes in patients covering a wide range of body weight. Liver biopsies from 36 individuals with a body mass index (BMI) ranging from 18 to 63 kg/m 2 were obtained. Individual hepatic microsomes were prepared and activities of CYP3A, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19 and CYP1A2 were determined. The unbound intrinsic clearance (CL int,u) values for CYP3A correlated negatively with body weight (r ¼ À0.43, p < 0.01), waist circumference (r ¼ À0.47, p < 0.01), hip circumference (r ¼ À0.51, p < 0.01), fat percent (r ¼ À0.41, p < 0.05), fat mass (r ¼ À0.48, p < 0.01) and BMI (r ¼ À0.46, p < 0.01). Linear regression analysis showed that CL int,u values for CYP3A decreased with 5% with each 10% increase in body weight (r 2 ¼ 0.12, b ¼ À0.558, p < 0.05). There were no correlations between body weight measures and CL int,u values for the other CYP enzymes investigated. These results indicate reduced hepatic metabolizing capacity of CYP3A substrates in patients with increasing body weight.