Cytological screening for cervical cancer or its precursors using Papanicolaou's smear test (Pap test) has been highly efficient to reduce the morbidity and mortality of cervical cancer. However, evaluation of the Pap test relies on subjective diagnostic parameters and is affected by a high rate of false-positive and false-negative results. More objective diagnostic parameters to identify truly dysplastic or neoplastic cells in cervical smears as well as in cervical biopsy samples would therefore avoid insecurity for many patients and the high screening costs associated with repeated testing. Cervical dysplasia is induced by persistent infections through highrisk types of human papillomaviruses (HPVs). Outgrowth of dysplastic lesions is triggered by increasing expression of two viral oncogenes, E6 and E7, which both interact with various cell cycle-regulating proteins. Among these is the retinoblastoma gene product pRB, which is inactivated by E7. pRB inhibits transcription of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor gene p16 INK4a . Increasing expression of the viral oncogenes in dysplastic cervical cells might thus be reflected by increased expression of p16 INK4a . In line with this hypothesis, we observed marked overexpression of p16 INK4a in all cervical intraepithelial neoplasm (CIN) I lesions (n ‫؍‬ 47) except those associated with low-risk HPV types (n ‫؍‬ 7), all CIN II lesions (n ‫؍‬ 32), all CIN III lesions (n ‫؍‬ 60) and 58 of 60 invasive cervical cancers. In contrast, no detectable expression of p16 INK4a was observed in normal cervical epithelium (n ‫؍‬ 42), inflammatory lesions (n ‫؍‬ 48) and low-grade cervical lesions (CIN I) associated with low-risk HPV types (n ‫؍‬ 7). Dysplastic cells could also be identified in cervical smears using a specific p16 INK4a monoclonal antibody. These data demonstrate that p16 INK4a is a specific biomarker to identify dysplastic cervical epithelia in sections of cervical biopsy samples or cervical smears.

BackgroundPap cytology is known to be more specific but less sensitive than testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) for the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+). We assessed whether p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology, a biomarker combination indicative of transforming HPV infections, can provide high sensitivity for CIN2+ in screening while maintaining high specificity. Results were compared with Pap cytology and HPV testing.MethodsA total of 27349 women 18 years or older attending routine cervical cancer screening were prospectively enrolled in five European countries. Pap cytology, p16/Ki-67 immunostaining, and HPV testing were performed on all women. Positive test results triggered colposcopy referral, except for women younger than 30 years with only positive HPV test results. Presence of CIN2+ on adjudicated histology was used as the reference standard. Two-sided bias-corrected McNemar P values were determined.ResultsThe p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology positivity rates were comparable with the prevalence of abnormal Pap cytology results and less than 50% of the positivity rates observed for HPV testing. In women of all ages, dual-stained cytology was more sensitive than Pap cytology (86.7% vs 68.5%; P < .001) for detecting CIN2+, with comparable specificity (95.2% vs 95.4%; P = .15). The relative performance of the tests was similar in both groups of women: younger than age 30 and 30 years or older. HPV testing in women 30 years or older was more sensitive than dual-stained cytology (93.3% vs 84.7%; P = .03) but less specific (93.0% vs 96.2%; P < .001).ConclusionsThe p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology combines superior sensitivity and noninferior specificity over Pap cytology for detecting CIN2+. It suggests a potential role of dual-stained cytology in screening, especially in younger women where HPV testing has its limitations.

No abstract

Persistent high risk type human papillomavirus (HR ± HPVs) infections induce dysplasia or cancer of the anogenital tract, most notably of the uterine cervix. The viral genome usually persists and replicates as an episomal molecule in early dysplasia, whereas in advanced dysplasia or cervical cancer HPV genomes are frequently integrated into the chromosomal DNA of the host cell. Previous studies suggested that modi®cation of critical cellular sequences by integration of HPV genomes might signi®cantly contribute to the neoplastic transformation of anogenital epithelia (insertional mutagenesis). This prompted us to characterize the integration loci of high risk HPV genomes in a large set of genital lesions. We ampli®ed E6/E7 oncogene transcripts derived from integrated HPV16 and HPV18 genomes and characterized in detail the co-transcribed cellular sequences of 64 primary genital lesions and ®ve cervical cancer cell lines. Database analyses of the cellular parts of these fusion transcripts revealed 51 dierent integration loci, including 26 transcribed genes (14 known genes, 12 EST sequences with unknown gene function). Seventeen sequences showed similarity to repetitive elements, and 26 sequences did not show any database match other than genomic sequence. Chromosomal integration loci were distributed over almost all human chromosomes. Although we found HPV sequences integrated into cancer related genes and close to fragile sites, no preferential site or integration motif could be identi®ed. These data demonstrate that target directed insertional mutagenesis might occur in few HPV-induced anogenital lesions, however, it is rather the exception than the rule.

No abstract

The histopathologic interpretation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is subject to a high level of interobserver variability and a substantial number of false-positive and false-negative results. We assessed the impact of the conjunctive interpretation of p16(INK4a)-immunostained slides on the accuracy of community-based pathologists in diagnosing high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN; CIN 2 and CIN 3) in biopsy specimens. Twelve pathologists rendered independent diagnoses on a set of 500 H&E-stained cervical punch and conization specimens. Results were compared with a dichotomized "gold standard" established by consensus of 3 gynecopathology experts. When p16(INK4a)-immunostained slides were added and conjunctively interpreted with the H&E-stained slides, a significant increase in diagnostic accuracy for the detection of high-grade CIN was observed (P = .0004). Sensitivity for high-grade CIN was increased by 13%, cutting the rate of false-negative results in half. Agreement of community-based pathologists in diagnosing high-grade CIN was significantly improved (mean kappa values advanced from 0.566 to 0.749; P < .0001). Reproducibility of p16(INK4a) stain interpretation was excellent (kappa = 0.899). Our results show that conjunctive interpretation of p16(INK4a)-stained slides could significantly improve the routine interpretation of cervical histopathology.

; Ruediger Ridder, PhD 9,10 ; and for the PALMS Study Group KEY WORDS: cervical cytology; atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US); low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL); p16/Ki-67 dual-stained cytology; CINtec PLUS; human papillomavirus (HPV); triage; Primary ASC-US LSIL Marker Study (PALMS).

We analyzed the performance of p16(INK4a) immunocytochemistry on a series of 810 retrospectively collected atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) cases with available biopsy follow-up data, including 94 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 and 128 cases of CIN 3. Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing was performed from the same residual liquid-based cytologic specimen, and results for both tests were correlated with histologic follow-up data. Sensitivity values for high-grade CIN (HGCIN) confirmed on biopsy within 6 months were 92.6% (ASC-US) and 92.2% (LSIL) for cytotechnologists' reviews of p16 cytology and 90.1% (ASC-US) and 95.7% (LSIL) for HPV testing. Sensitivity rates of initial pathologists' reviews were slightly lower, 76.4% to 80.1%, with levels comparable to cytotechnologists' results after adjudication. The specificity of p16 cytology for HGCIN detection was significantly higher than for HPV testing for cytotechnologists and pathologists: 63.2% to 71.1% (p16 cytology) vs 37.8% for HPV in ASC-US (P < .001) and 37.3% to 53.3% (p16 cytology) vs 18.5% for HPV in LSIL (P < .001). This evaluation of the diagnostic performance of p16 cytology confirms the potential of this stain for the efficient triage of ASC-US and LSIL cytologic results.