Background Pronounced sex differences in the susceptibility and response to SARS-CoV-2 infection remain poorly understood. Emerging evidence has highlighted the potential importance of autoimmune activation in modulating the acute response and recovery trajectories following SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Given that immune-inflammatory activity can be sex-biased in the setting of severe COVID-19 illness, the aim of the study was to examine sex-specific autoimmune reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 in the absence of extreme clinical disease. Methods In this study, we assessed autoantibody (AAB) reactivity to 91 autoantigens previously linked to a range of classic autoimmune diseases in a cohort of 177 participants (65% women, 35% men, mean age of 35) with confirmed evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection based on presence of antibody to the nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV-2. Data were compared to 53 pre-pandemic healthy controls (49% women, 51% men). For each participant, socio-demographic data, serological analyses, SARS-CoV-2 infection status and COVID-19 related symptoms were collected by an electronic survey of questions. The symptoms burden score was constructed based on the total number of reported symptoms (N = 21) experienced within 6 months prior to the blood draw, wherein a greater number of symptoms corresponded to a higher score and assigned as more severe burden. Results In multivariable analyses, we observed sex-specific patterns of autoreactivity associated with the presence or absence (as well as timing and clustering of symptoms) associated with prior COVID-19 illness. Whereas the overall AAB response was more prominent in women following asymptomatic infection, the breadth and extent of AAB reactivity was more prominent in men following at least mildly symptomatic infection. Notably, the observed reactivity included distinct antigens with molecular homology with SARS-CoV-2. Conclusion Our results reveal that prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, even in the absence of severe clinical disease, can lead to a broad AAB response that exhibits sex-specific patterns of prevalence and antigen selectivity. Further understanding of the nature of triggered AAB activation among men and women exposed to SARS-CoV-2 will be essential for developing effective interventions against immune-mediated sequelae of COVID-19.
Introduction: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is characterized by diastolic dysfunction, pulmonary congestion and exercise intolerance. Previous preclinical studies show that treatment with cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs) improves diastolic function, attenuates arrhythmias and prolongs survival in a rat HFpEF model. Here we characterize the myocardial proteome and diastolic function in HFpEF, with and without CDC therapy. As an initial strategy for identifying pathways worthy of further mechanistic dissection, we correlated CDC-responsive proteomic changes with functional improvements. Methods and Results: Dahl salt-sensitive rats fed high-salt diet, with verified diastolic dysfunction, were randomly assigned to intracoronary CDCs or placebo. Dahl rats fed a low salt diet served as controls. Phenotyping was by echocardiography (E/A ratio) and invasive hemodynamic monitoring (time constant of relaxation Tau, and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure [LVEDP]). CDC treatment improved diastolic function as indicated by a normalized E/A ratio, a 33.3% reduction in Tau, and a 47% reduction of LVEDP. Mass spectrometry of left ventricular tissues (n=6/group) revealed changes in transcription and translation pathways in this rat HFpEF model and was also recapitulated in human HFpEF. These pathways were enhanced following CDC treatment in the animal model (205 proteins and 32 phosphorylated residues accounting for 37% and 19% of all changes, respectively). Among all CDC-sensitive pathways, 65% can be linked to at least 1 of 7 upstream regulators, among which several are of potential relevance for regulating protein expression. To probe newly-synthesized proteins AHA labeling was carried out in isolated rat cardiomyocytes obtained from HFpEF groups, with and without CDC therapy. Five of the initial upstream regulators (HNF4A, MTOR, MYC, TGFβ1, and TP53) were linked to proteins expressed exclusively (or increased) with CDC treatment. All 32 phosphorylated residues of proteins involved in transcription/translation altered specifically by CDC treatment had predicted kinases (Protein kinase C (PKC) being the most dominant) and known to be regulated by MYC, TGFβ1 and/or TP53. Western blot analysis of those 5 upstream regulators showed that TGFβ1, TP53, and Myc were significantly decreased in LV from CDC treated animals, whereas MTOR and HNF4A showed a significant increase compared to HFpEF alone. The cellular quantities of several upstream regulator correlated with indices of diastolic function (E/A ratio, Tau and/or LVEDP). Since CDCs act via the secretion of exosomes laden with signaling cargo, it is relevant that all 7 upstream regulators could, in principle, be regulated by proteins or miRNA that are present in CDC-derived exosomes. Conclusion: We identified key cellular regulators of transcription and translation that underlie the therapeutic effects of CDCs in HFpEF, whose levels correlate quantitatively with measures of diastolic function. Among the multifarious proteomic changes associated with rat model of HFpEF which were also observed in human HFpEF samples, we propose that these regulators, and downstream effector kinases, be prioritized for further dedicated mechanistic dissection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.