Bacterial meningitis is a global public health concern, with several responsible etiologic agents that vary by age group and geographical area. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the etiology of bacterial meningitis in different age groups across global regions. PubMed and EMBASE were systematically searched for English language studies on bacterial meningitis, limited to articles published in the last five years. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using a customized scoring system. Meta-analyses were conducted to determine the frequency (percentages) of seven bacterial types known to cause meningitis: Escherichia coli, Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, group B Streptococcus agalactiae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Listeria monocytogenes, with results being stratified by six geographical regions as determined by the World Health Organization, and seven age groups.Of the 3227 studies retrieved, 56 were eligible for the final analysis. In all age groups, S. pneumoniae and N. meningitidis were the predominant pathogens in all regions, accounting for 25.1–41.2% and 9.1–36.2% of bacterial meningitis cases, respectively. S. pneumoniae infection was the most common cause of bacterial meningitis in the ‘all children’ group, ranging from 22.5% (Europe) to 41.1% (Africa), and in all adults ranging from 9.6% (Western Pacific) to 75.2% (Africa). E. coli and S. pneumoniae were the most common pathogens that caused bacterial meningitis in neonates in Africa (17.7% and 20.4%, respectively). N. meningitidis was the most common in children aged ±1–5 years in Europe (47.0%). Due to paucity of data, meta-analyses could not be performed in all age groups for all regions.A clear difference in the weighted frequency of bacterial meningitis cases caused by the different etiological agents was observed between age groups and between geographic regions. These findings may facilitate bacterial meningitis prevention and treatment strategies.
Background With more than 100 million new hepatitis A (HepA) virus (HAV) infections estimated each year, HepA is a serious health concern worldwide. Several countries implemented 2- or 1-dose universal mass vaccination (UMV) programs of children with HAV vaccines. Here we present the first systematic review describing the impact of 2- and 1-dose UMV programs on HepA incidence and related health outcomes. Methods We systematically searched several databases for data published between Jan 2000–Jul 2019 (Figure 1). We assessed available evidence for 2- and 1-dose UMV programs with inactivated HAV vaccine in children worldwide, in terms of impact on HepA incidence, disease severity and mortality, vaccine efficacy, vaccine effectiveness and antibody persistence. Figure 1. PRISMA flowchart Results 3739 articles were screened and 34 studies were included in our analysis (Figure 1). 18 real-world studies in 9 countries showed that HepA incidence declined in all ages following introduction of 2-dose and 1-dose UMV programs and persisted for at least 14 years (2-dose) and at least 6 years (1-dose) (Figure 2). Evidence for 1-dose schedule was limited to only 3 studies. HAV related outcomes (disease severity, mortality) decreased after UMV with either 2-dose or 1-dose schedule. Vaccine effectiveness for the 2-dose schedules was ≥ 95% over 3–5 years. Vaccine efficacy for the 1-dose schedule was > 98% over 0.1–7.5 years. Anti-HAV antibody persistence in vaccinated children was documented up to 15 years with ≥ 90% seropositivity rates for the 2-dose schedule and up to 10 years with ≥ 74.3% seropositivity rates for the 1-dose schedule. Anti-HAV antibody GMC data is presented in Table 1. Figure 2. Impact of vaccination on hepatitis A incidence in countries implementing 2-dose or 1-dose schedules (data from studies presenting ‘all ages’ incidence data) Table 1. Anti-HAV antibody GMCs following vaccination with 2-dose and 1-dose schedules, data from studies included in our review Conclusion The implementation of 2- and 1-dose UMV programs against HAV induced decreases in disease incidence and related outcomes. Experience with 2-dose schedule is extensive, with wide geographical use, while evidence beyond 10 years for the 1-dose schedule has not yet been demonstrated. Continued and robust surveillance is needed to monitor the epidemiology, vaccine effectiveness, antibody persistence and protection (particularly in the absence of natural boosting) in order to have a strong, scientifically sound basis for decision makers when concluding on HepA prevention strategies in their countries. Funding: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA Disclosures Anar Andani, BSc, GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Eveline M. Bunge, PhD, GSK group of companies (Research Grant or Support) Fernanda Salgado, MD, MSc, GSK group of companies (Employee) Rosa C. van Hoorn, MSc, GSK group of companies (Research Grant or Support) Bernard Hoet, MD, FFPM, GSK group of companies (Shareholder)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.