Purpose: To describe both the evolution and the main associated complications in the anesthetic management of the initial 40 patients at our centre who underwent percutaneous retrograde aortic valve replacement, a novel technique utilizing a catheterguided femoral artery approach. Clinical features:With institutional Research Ethics Board approval, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of the first 40 patients who underwent percutaneous retrograde aortic valve replacement between January 2005 and March 2006. Information obtained included patient characteristics, anesthetic management, details of the procedure, and complications. All procedures were scheduled to be performed in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. The first four patients received monitored anesthesia care, and the subsequent 36 underwent general anesthesia. There were no anesthesia-related adverse events. The prosthetic valve was placed successfully in 33/40 patients (83%). Median anesthetic time was 3.5 hr (range, 1.25-7.25 hr). Thirty-two/40 patients required vasopressor support. The most common, serious procedural complications were myocardial ischemia and arrhythmia following rapid ventricular pacing, hemorrhage from vascular injury secondary to the placement and removal of the large-bore sheath in the ilio-femoral artery, aortic rupture, and prosthetic valve maldeployment; 30-day mortality was 13% (n = 5/40). Conclusions:Percutaneous retrograde aortic valve replacement is a novel procedure that presents the anesthesiologist with unique challenges. Careful preoperative assessment, intraoperative monitoring appropriate for a major vascular procedure, and meticulous management of hemodynamics are imperative for a successful outcome. Serious complications, including major hemorrhage from vascular injury as well as arrhythmia and myocardial ischemia following rapid ventricular pacing, must be anticipated and managed in an expeditious fashion.

No abstract

No abstract

Purpose Peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) provide excellent perioperative analgesia but can increase the risk of severe postoperative pain once the block wears off. Poor adherence to discharge instructions may increase this risk. Panda-Nerve Block (Panda) is an app that alerts the patient to assess their PNB, score their pain, and take scheduled pain medication. We assessed the usability and feasibility of Panda for assisting patients after receiving a PNB. Methods Twenty-nine patients tested Panda in three rounds, for two to seven days, postoperatively to assess and manage their pain and PNB. Feedback was provided via phone interview and the Computer System Usability Questionnaire (CSUQ). Additionally, each user's usage log was analyzed for parameters such as alert response times. Feasibility was determined by alert responses that occurred before the next alert, with a goal of greater than 50%. User adherence was measured as percentage compliance with alerts within one hour; usability and user satisfaction were determined from the CSUQ and interviews. Results A median [interquartile range (IQR)] of 68 [34-93]% responded before the next alert during the first 48 hr of app use, and 83 [54-92]% responded before the next alert with 87 [75-96]% of these within one hour. There were no significant differences in usage between rounds. Ninety-three percent of patients reported Panda to be easy to use and helpful, and 79% of patients would use Panda again. Critical themes included changes to the layout and appearance, clarification of the language of the PNB