No abstract

Many decisions in drug development and medical practice are based on measuring blood concentrations of endogenous and exogenous molecules. Yet most biochemical and pharmacological events take place in the tissues. Also, most drugs with few notable exceptions exert their effects not within the bloodstream, but in defined target tissues into which drugs have to distribute from the central compartment. Assessing tissue drug chemistry has, thus, for long been viewed as a more rational way to provide clinically meaningful data rather than gaining information from blood samples. More specifically, it is often the extracellular (interstitial) tissue space that is most closely related to the site of action (biophase) of the drug. Currently microdialysis (microD) is the only tool available that explicitly provides data on the extracellular space. Although microD as a preclinical and clinical tool has been available for two decades, there is still uncertainty about the use of microD in drug research and development, both from a methodological and a regulatory point of view. In an attempt to reduce this uncertainty and to provide an overview of the principles and applications of microD in preclinical and clinical settings, an AAPS-FDA workshop took place in November 2005 in Nashville, TN, USA. Stakeholders from academia, industry and regulatory agencies presented their views on microD as a tool in drug research and development.

No abstract

Mycophenolate mofetil is used increasingly to provide immunosuppression after nonmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. There is wide variability in the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active metabolite, and low concentrations are associated with rejection after organ transplantation. We hypothesized that low MPA was associated with poorer engraftment and a higher incidence of acute graft versus host disease. We evaluated the pharmacokinetics in 87 adult subjects undergoing nonmyeloablative-related and nonmyeloablative-unrelated hematopoietic cell transplantation who were receiving 1 g mycophenolate mofetil orally or intravenously every 12 hours plus cyclosporine (INN, ciclosporin). Subjects with an unbound MPA area under the curve (AUC) from 0 to 6 hours of less than 150 ng . h/mL had a higher cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft versus host disease than subjects with a greater AUC (68% versus 40%, P = .02). An unbound AUC from 0 to 12 hours of less than 300 ng . h/mL was also associated with more frequent acute graft versus host disease (58% versus 35%, P = .05). There was no association between graft versus host disease and trough concentrations (P < or = .62). A higher cumulative incidence of engraftment was associated with total MPA trough concentrations greater than 1 microg/mL (P < .01). All engraftment failures occurred in the cord blood recipients. About one half of subjects were below the unbound AUC target after oral dosing with nearly a 5-fold variability in AUC. Intravenous dosing achieved unbound targets better than oral dosing. The current practice of dosing with 1 g twice daily provides inadequate plasma concentrations in many patients, and doses of at least 3 g/d are likely necessary. Therapeutic monitoring of MPA concentrations with dose adjustment into the therapeutic target appears to be necessary for the most effective use of mycophenolate mofetil.