BackgroundCancer-related fatigue (CRF) and insomnia are major complaints in breast cancer survivors (BC). Aerobic training (AT), the standard therapy for CRF in BC, shows only minor to moderate treatment effects. Other evidence-based treatments include cognitive behavioral therapy, e.g., sleep education/restriction (SE) and mindfulness-based therapies. We investigated the effectiveness of a 10-week multimodal program (MT) consisting of SE, psycho-education, eurythmy- and painting-therapy, administered separately or in combination with AT (CT) and compared both arms to AT alone.MethodsIn a pragmatic comprehensive cohort study BC with chronic CRF were allocated randomly or by patient preference to (a) MT, (b) CT (MT + AT) or (c) AT alone. Primary endpoint was a composite score of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the Cancer Fatigue Scale after 10 weeks of intervention (T1); a second endpoint was a follow-up assessment 6 months later (T2). The primary hypothesis stated superiority of CT and non-inferiority of MT vs. AT at T1. A closed testing procedure preserved the global α-level. The intention-to-treat analysis included propensity scores for the mode of allocation and for the preferred treatment, respectively.ResultsAltogether 126 BC were recruited: 65 were randomized and 61 allocated by preference; 105 started the intervention. Socio-demographic parameters were generally balanced at baseline. Non-inferiority of MT to AT at T1 was confirmed (p < 0.05), yet the confirmative analysis stopped as it was not possible to confirm superiority of CT vs. AT (p = 0.119). In consecutive exploratory analyses MT and CT were superior to AT at T1 and T2 (MT) or T2 alone (CT), respectively.ConclusionsThe multimodal CRF-therapy was found to be confirmatively non-inferior to standard therapy and even yielded exploratively sustained superiority. A randomized controlled trial including a larger sample size and a longer follow-up to evaluate multimodal CRF-therapy is highly warranted.Trial registerDRKS-ID: DRKS00003736. Recruitment period June 2011 to March 2013. Date of registering 19 June 2012.

It would often be desirable to obtain the respiratory rate during everyday conditions without obtaining an additional respiratory trace. This study investigates the agreement between respiratory rate assessed from the electrocardiogram (ECG) and the reference respiratory rate derived from a nasal/oral airflow (AF). Nasal/oral airflow and a Holter ECG were recorded in 52 healthy subjects (26 males, age range: 25.4-85.4 years) during everyday conditions for at least 10 h, including night-time sleep. The respiratory rate was assessed for each 5-min epoch (1) using respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), (2) utilizing the respiration induced variations of the R-wave amplitude (ECG derived respiration (EDR)). The agreement with respect to AF was quantified using the average/std and the concordance correlation coefficient rho(c). For RSA and EDR the difference with respect to AF was 0.2 cpm (std: 0.6 cpm) during sleep and -0.2 cpm (std: 1.0 cpm) during wake time. During sleep the RSA-approach performed best for subjects < or =50 years (rho(c) = 0.79) and worst for subjects >50 years (rho(c) = 0.41). The correlation of the EDR-approach was rho(c) = 0.73 for both groups. In conclusion, the respiratory rate may be assessed with reasonable agreement by both methods in younger subjects, but EDR should be preferred in the elderly.

Fatigue is a very important factor determining the quality of life in patients with malignancies. Cancer fatigue occurs with anaemia, during and after chemo- or radiotherapy and in patients with advanced tumours. The Cancer Fatigue Scale (CFS) is a three-dimensional inventory with 15 items which was originally developed in Japan. We present the results of a validation study of the German version (CFS-D) of this instrument. The CFS-D was administered to 114 participants in a matched-pair study. In total, 57 (41 women) of the participants had malignant conditions, and 57 (41 women) were healthy volunteers. The Fatigue Numerical Scale was used to test convergence. The physical and performance status of the cancer patients was assessed by the Karnofsky-Index. Criteria for testing multidimensionality were the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the questionnaire on autonomic regulation. We generated a three-dimensional inventory of the CFS-D with the subscales physical fatigue/vitality, cognitive and affective fatigue. The reliability results for the complete scale: Cronbach's alpha: r(alpha) = 0.94, retest reliability: r(rt) = 0.82. The convergence criteria correlate between r = 0.44-0.65 (all P < 0.001). The CFS-D is highly reliable and has construct validity in relation to other measures.

Background: To broaden the range of outcomes that we can measure for patients undergoing treatment for oncological and other chronic conditions, we aimed to validate a questionnaire measuring self-reported autonomic regulation (aR), i.e. to characterise a subject's autonomic functioning by questions on sleeping and waking, vertigo, morningness-eveningness, thermoregulation, perspiration, bowel movements and digestion.

Hypothese: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) and sleep disorders are some of the most wearing and common symptoms in disease-free breast cancer patients (BC). Aerobic training (AT) is the treatment with the best available evidence, even though it seems to be insufficient with regards to improvements in cognitive fatigue. We introduced a new multimodal therapy concept (MM) consisting of psycho-, sleep-education and new approaches based on anthroposophic medicine such as eurythmy and painting therapy. Study design: This pilot study will test the implementation of MM and yield first results of the MM and AE in our centres. Methods: 31 out of 34 patients suffering from BC and CRF were fully assessed in a ten-week intervention study. 21 patients chose MM and 10 decided on AT. CRF was measured with the help of the Cancer Fatigue Scale (CFS-D), and the global quality of sleep was measured with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). We also captured autonomic regulation (aR) and patients' satisfaction with questionnaires. Statistical analysis was done with SAS 9.1.3 for windows. Results:The new MM therapy can be implemented with high satisfaction among patients. Significant improvements were found in the MM group with regards to CFS-D, global quality of sleep, sleep efficiency (PSQI), aR and rest/activity regulation compared to baseline (all p<0.05). In the AT group aR orthostatic-circulatory and rest/activity regulation improved significantly (p<0.05), too. However, no improvement in cognitive fatigue was seen in either group. Conclusion: The multimodal therapy concept was feasible and improved cancer fatigue, sleep quality, autonomic and rest-/ activity regulation in breast cancer patients. It may therefore constitute a valuable treatment option in addition to aerobic training for BC patients with CRF. A further study with larger sample size needs to be carried out to assess the efficacy of combined multimodal-aerobic therapy.

Context: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is one of the most burdensome symptoms in breast cancer survivors (BCSs), accompanied by reduced health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Objectives: This study investigated the influence of a multimodal therapy (MT; psychoeducation, eurythmy therapy, painting therapy, and sleep education/restriction), or a combination therapy (CT; MT plus aerobic training [AT]) on HRQOL in BCS with chronic CRF in comparison with AT alone. Methods: One hundred and twenty-six BCSs with CRF were included in a pragmatic comprehensive cohort study and allocated either per randomization or by preference to MT, CT, or AT. The EORTC QLQ-C30 core questionnaire was used to measure HRQOL. All analyses on HRQOL parameters were done in an explorative intention. Results: Patients were assigned to MT (n = 44), CT (n = 54), or AT (n = 28). CT was significantly superior to AT after 10 weeks of intervention (T1) in improving physical function. MT was found to have significant superiority over AT at T1 and T2 for physical functioning, emotional functioning, insomnia, and financial problems as well as role functioning, cognitive, social functioning, and fatigue 6 months later (T2). Conclusion: A multimodal approach appears to be a suitable concept for BCS with chronic CRF. A confirmatory study with larger samples should demonstrate the superiority of MT and adapted CT in HRQOL compared with the current treatment AT found in these explorative analyses.

No abstract

AR seems to be a prognostic factor in breast cancer survivors, capable of reducing cancer-related fatigue and self-regulation distress as well. Further research is necessary in order to show how aR can be improved by therapeutic interventions.