Using budding yeast, we investigated a negative interaction network among genes for tRNA modifications previously implicated in anticodon-codon interaction: 5-methoxy-carbonyl-methyl-2-thio-uridine (mcm5s2U34: ELP3, URM1), pseudouridine (Ψ38/39: DEG1) and cyclic N6-threonyl-carbamoyl-adenosine (ct6A37: TCD1). In line with functional cross talk between these modifications, we find that combined removal of either ct6A37 or Ψ38/39 and mcm5U34 or s2U34 results in morphologically altered cells with synthetic growth defects. Phenotypic suppression by tRNA overexpression suggests that these defects are caused by malfunction of tRNALysUUU or tRNAGlnUUG, respectively. Indeed, mRNA translation and synthesis of the Gln-rich prion Rnq1 are severely impaired in the absence of Ψ38/39 and mcm5U34 or s2U34, and this defect can be rescued by overexpression of tRNAGlnUUG. Surprisingly, we find that combined modification defects in the anticodon loops of different tRNAs induce similar cell polarity- and nuclear segregation defects that are accompanied by increased aggregation of cellular proteins. Since conditional expression of an artificial aggregation-prone protein triggered similar cytological aberrancies, protein aggregation is likely responsible for loss of morphogenesis and cytokinesis control in mutants with inappropriate tRNA anticodon loop modifications.

SUMMARY Genetic studies with S. cerevisiae Polδ (pol3-L612M) and Polε (pol2-M644G) mutant alleles, each of which display a higher rate for the generation of a specific mismatch, have led to the conclusion that Polε is the primary leading strand replicase and that Polδ is restricted to replicating the lagging strand template. Contrary to this widely accepted view, here we show that Polδ plays a major role in the replication of both DNA strands, and that the paucity of pol3-L612M generated errors on the leading strand results from their more proficient removal. Thus, the apparent lack of Polδ contribution to leading strand replication is due to differential mismatch removal rather than differential mismatch generation. Altogether, our genetic studies with Pol3 and Pol2 mutator alleles support the conclusion that Polδ, and not Polε, is the major DNA polymerase for carrying out both leading and lagging DNA synthesis.

No abstract

SummaryCertain strains of Pichia acaciae and Wingea robertsiae (synonym Debaryomyces robertsiae ) harbour extranuclear genetic elements that confer a killer phenotype to their host. Such killer plasmids (pPac1-2 of P. acaciae and pWR1A of W. robertsiae ) were sequenced and compared with the zymocin encoding pGKL1 of Kluyveromyces lactis . Both new elements were found to be closely related to each other, but they are only partly similar to pGKL1. As for the latter, they encode functions mediating binding of the toxin to the target cell's chitin and a hydrophobic region potentially involved in uptake of a toxin subunit by target cells. Consistently, mutations affecting the target cell's major chitin synthase (Chs3) protect it from toxin action. Heterologous intracellular expression of respective open reading frames identified cell cyclearresting toxin subunits deviating structurally from the likewise imported g g g g -subunit of the K. lactis zymocin. Accordingly, toxicity of both P. acaciae and Wingea toxins was shown to be independent of RNA polymerase II Elongator, which is indispensable for zymocin action. Thus, P. acaciae and Wingea toxins differ in their mode of action from the G1-arresting zymocin. Fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis and determination of budding indices have proved that such novel toxins mediate cell cycle arrest post-G1 during the S phase. Concomitantly, the DNA damage checkpoint kinase Rad53 is phosphorylated. As a mutant carrying the checkpoint-deficient allele rad53-11 displays toxin hypersensitivity, damage checkpoint activation apparently contributes to coping with toxin stress, rather than being functionally implemented in toxin action.

The exozymocin secreted by Kluyveromyces lactis causes sensitive yeast cells, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae, to arrest growth in the G 1 phase of the cell cycle. Despite its heterotrimeric (abc) structure, intracellular expression of its smallest subunit, the c-toxin, is alone responsible for the G 1 arrest. The a subunit, however, has a chitinase activity that is essential for holozymocin action from the cell exterior. Here we show that sensitive yeast cells can be rescued from zymocin treatment by exogenously applying crude chitin preparations, supporting the idea that chitin polymers can compete for binding to zymocin with chitin present on the surface of sensitive yeast cells. Consistent with this, holozymocin can be purified by way of affinity chromatography using an immobilized chitin matrix. PCR-mediated deletions of chitin synthesis (CHS) genes show that most, if not all, genetic scenarios that lead to complete loss (chs3D), blocked export (chs7D) or reduced activation (chs4D), combined with mislocalization (chs4Dchs5D; chs4Dchs6D; chs4Dchs5Dchs6D) of chitin synthase III activity (CSIII), render cells refractory to the inhibitory effects of exozymocin. In contrast, deletions in CHS1 and CHS2, which code for CSI and CSII, respectively, have no effect on zymocin sensitivity. Thus, CSIII-polymerized chitin, which amounts to almost 90% of the cell's chitin resources, appears to be the carbohydrate receptor required for the initial interaction of zymocin with sensitive cells.

DNA polymerase δ (Polδ) plays an essential role in replication from yeast to humans. Polδ in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is comprised of three subunits, the catalytic subunit Pol3 and the accessory subunits Pol31 and Pol32. Yeast Polδ exhibits a very high processivity in synthesizing DNA with the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) sliding clamp; however, it has remained unclear how Polδ binds PCNA to achieve its high processivity. Here we show that PCNA interacting protein (PIP) motifs in all three subunits contribute to PCNA-stimulated DNA synthesis by Polδ, and mutational inactivation of all three PIP motifs abrogates its ability to synthesize DNA with PCNA. Genetic analyses of mutations in these PIPs have revealed that in the absence of functional Pol32 PIP domain, PCNA binding by both the Pol3 and Pol31 subunits becomes essential for cell viability. Based on our biochemical and genetic studies we infer that yeast Polδ can simultaneously utilize all three PIP motifs during PCNA-dependent DNA synthesis, and suggest that Polδ binds the PCNA homotrimer via its three subunits. We consider the implications of these observations for Polδ's role in DNA replication.

SummaryDiphthamide is a conserved modification in archaeal and eukaryal translation elongation factor 2 (EF2). Its name refers to the target function for diphtheria toxin, the disease-causing agent that, through ADP ribosylation of diphthamide, causes irreversible inactivation of EF2 and cell death. Although this clearly emphasizes a pathobiological role for diphthamide, its physiological function is unclear, and precisely why cells need EF2 to contain diphthamide is hardly understood. Nonetheless, the conservation of diphthamide biosynthesis together with syndromes (i.e. ribosomal frame-shifting, embryonic lethality, neurodegeneration and cancer) typical of mutant cells that cannot make it strongly suggests that diphthamidemodified EF2 occupies an important and translationrelated role in cell proliferation and development. Whether this is structural and/or regulatory remains to be seen. However, recent progress in dissecting the diphthamide gene network (DPH1-DPH7) from the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has significantly advanced our understanding of the mechanisms required to initiate and complete diphthamide synthesis on EF2. Here, we review recent developments in the field that not only have provided novel, previously overlooked and unexpected insights into the pathway and the biochemical players required for diphthamide synthesis but also are likely to foster innovative studies into the potential regulation of diphthamide, and importantly, its ill-defined biological role.

In eukaryotes, wobble uridines in the anticodons of tRNALys UUU, tRNAGlu UUC and tRNAGln UUG are modified to 5-methoxy-carbonyl-methyl-2-thio-uridine (mcm5s2U). While mutations in subunits of the Elongator complex (Elp1-Elp6), which disable mcm5 side chain formation, or removal of components of the thiolation pathway (Ncs2/Ncs6, Urm1, Uba4) are individually tolerated, the combination of both modification defects has been reported to have lethal effects on Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Contrary to such absolute requirement of mcm5s2U for viability, we demonstrate here that in the S. cerevisiae S288C-derived background, both pathways can be simultaneously inactivated, resulting in combined loss of tRNA anticodon modifications (mcm5U and s2U) without a lethal effect. However, an elp3 disruption strain displays synthetic sick interaction and synergistic temperature sensitivity when combined with either uba4 or urm1 mutations, suggesting major translational defects in the absence of mcm5s2U modifications. Consistent with this notion, we find cellular protein levels drastically decreased in an elp3uba4 double mutant and show that this effect as well as growth phenotypes can be partially rescued by excess of tRNALys UUU. These results may indicate a global translational or protein homeostasis defect in cells simultaneously lacking mcm5 and s2 wobble uridine modification that could account for growth impairment and mainly originates from tRNALys UUU hypomodification and malfunction.