SummaryZymocin-induced cell death in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires the toxin-target (TOT) effector Elongator, a protein complex with functions in transcription, exocytosis and tRNA modification. In line with the latter, trm9 ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ cells lacking a tRNA methylase specific for wobble uridine (U 34 ) residues survive zymocin and in excess, the Trm9 substrate tRNA Glu copies zymocin protection of Elongator mutants. Phenotypes typical of a tot3/elp3 ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ Elongator mutant are absent from trm9 ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ cells but copied in a tot3 ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ trm9 ∆ ∆ ∆ ∆ double mutant suggesting that Elongator acts upstream of Trm9. Consistent with Elongator-dependent tRNA modification being more important to mRNA decoding than Trm9, SUP4 and SOE1 tRNA suppressors are highly sensitive to loss of Elongator and tRNA U 34 hypomodification. As Trm9 overexpression counteracts the effect of high-copy tRNA Glu
The phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) plays an important role in modulating plant growth, development, and stress responses. In a genetic screen for mutants with altered drought stress responses, we identified an ABA-overly sensitive mutant, the abo1 mutant, which showed a drought-resistant phenotype. The abo1 mutation enhances ABA-induced stomatal closing and increases ABA sensitivity in inhibiting seedling growth. abo1 mutants are more resistant to oxidative stress than the wild type and show reduced levels of transcripts of several stress-or ABA-responsive genes. Interestingly, the mutation also differentially modulates the development and growth of adjacent guard cells. Map-based cloning identified ABO1 as a new allele of ELO2, which encodes a homolog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Iki3/Elp1/Tot1 and human IB kinase-associated protein. Water stress caused by drought and soil salinity is an important environmental factor that limits the productivity and distribution of plants. The cellular and molecular mechanisms of plant responses to water stress have been analyzed extensively (48,59,63). Water stress can induce the accumulation of the phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA) (59). ABA plays a vital role in triggering stomatal closure, which reduces transpirational water loss and constitutes an essential part of plant drought tolerance (48,58,63). Analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana mutants has defined several ABA response loci that encode proteins such as protein phosphatases and kinases, which greatly affect guard cell movement (10,45,58).Recent studies indicate that transcripts of protein-coding genes are regulated at all steps of RNA metabolism, from transcription initiation to RNA processing (50). A great deal of information about plant transcriptional regulators that bind the promoters to initiate gene transcription in response to water stress has been collected (61). In contrast, much less is known about proteins involved in RNA processing (30). Nevertheless, recent studies point to a central role of RNA processing in regulating ABA sensitivity and osmotic stress responses. The RNA-binding protein FCA was reported to be an ABA receptor, although it appears to function in ABA regulation of flowering rather than in seed dormancy or drought tolerance (44). ABH1, a cap-binding protein, functions in early ABA signaling (20). A recessive mutation in the SAD1 gene encoding an Sm-like snRNP required for mRNA splicing, export, and degradation rendered plants hypersensitive to ABA and drought (56). The Arabidopsis HYL1 gene encodes a nuclear double-stranded RNA-binding protein. A knockout mutation of the HYL1 gene caused abnormal development, increased sensitivity to abscisic acid, and reduced sensitivity to auxin and cytokinin (33). HYL1 controls gene expression likely through microRNA-mediated gene regulation, although the targeted genes related to ABA sensitivity are still unknown (18). AKIP1 isolated from Vicia faba is a single-stranded RNAbinding protein which can bind to a dehydrin mRNA after phosphorylation by an ABA-...
SummaryThe toxin target (TOT) function of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Elongator complex enables Kluyveromyces lactis zymocin to induce a G1 cell cycle arrest. Loss of a ubiquitin-related system ( URM1-UBA4 ) and KTI11 enhances post-translational modification/proteolysis of Elongator subunit Tot1p (Elp1p) and abrogates its TOT function. Using TAP tagging, Kti11p contacts Elongator and translational proteins (Rps7Ap, Rps19Ap Eft2p, Yil103wp, Dph2p). Loss of YIL103w and DPH2 (involved in diphtheria toxicity) suppresses zymocicity implying that both toxins overlap in a manner mediated by Kti11p. Among the pool that co-fractionates with RNA polymerase II (pol II) and nucleolin, Nop1p, unmodified Tot1p dominates. Thus, modification/proteolysis may affect association of Elongator with pol II or its localization. Consistently, an Elongator-nuclear localization sequence (NLS) targets green fluorescent protein (GFP) to the nucleus, and its truncation yields TOT deficiency. Similarly, KAP120 deletion rescues cells from zymocin, suggesting that Elongator's TOT function requires NLS-and karyopherin-dependent nuclear import.
SummaryThe putative Kluyveromyces lactis zymocin target complex, TOT, from Saccharomyces cerevisiae comprises five Tot proteins, four of which are RNA polymerase II (RNAP II) Elongator subunits. Recently, two more Elongator subunit genes, ELP6 (TOT6 ) and ELP4 (TOT7 ), have been identified. Deletions of both TOT6 and TOT7 result in the complex tot phenotype, including resistance to zymocin, thermosensitivity, slow growth and hypersensitivity towards drugs, thus reinforcing the notion that TOT/Elongator may be crucial in signalling zymocicity. Mutagenesis of ELP3/TOT3, the Elongator histone acetyltransferase (HAT) gene, revealed that zymocin sensitivity could be uncoupled from Elongator wild-type function, indicating that TOT interacts genetically with zymocin. To test the possibility that zymocin functions by affecting RNAP II activity in a TOT/Elongatordependent manner, global poly(A) 1 mRNA levels were found to decline drastically on zymocin treatment. Moreover, cells overexpressing Fcp1p, the RNAP II carboxy-terminal domain phosphatase, acquired partial zymocin resistance, whereas cells underproducing RNAP II became zymocin hypersensitive. This suggests that zymocin may convert TOT/Elongator into a cellular poison toxic for RNAP II function and eventually leading to the observed G1 cell cycle arrest.
Kluyveromyces lactis zymocin, a heterotrimeric toxin complex, imposes a G1 cell cycle block on Saccharomyces cerevisiae that requires the toxin-target (TOT) function of holo-Elongator, a six-subunit histone acetylase. Here, we demonstrate that Elongator is a phospho-complex. Phosphorylation of its largest subunit Tot1 (Elp1) is supported by Kti11, an Elongator-interactor essential for zymocin action. Tot1 dephosphorylation depends on the Sit4 phosphatase and its associators Sap185 and Sap190. Zymocin-resistant cells lacking or overproducing Elongator-associator Tot4 (Kti12), respectively, abolish or intensify Tot1 phosphorylation. Excess Sit4.Sap190 antagonizes the latter scenario to reinstate zymocin sensitivity in multicopy TOT4 cells, suggesting physical competition between Sit4 and Tot4. Consistently, Sit4 and Tot4 mutually oppose Tot1 de-/phosphorylation, which is dispensable for integrity of holo-Elongator but crucial for the TOT-dependent G1 block by zymocin. Moreover, Sit4, Tot4, and Tot1 cofractionate, Sit4 is nucleocytoplasmically localized, and sit4Delta-nuclei retain Tot4. Together with the findings that sit4Delta and totDelta cells phenocopy protection against zymocin and the ceramide-induced G1 block, Sit4 is functionally linked to Elongator in cell cycle events targetable by antizymotics.
The exozymocin secreted by Kluyveromyces lactis causes sensitive yeast cells, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae, to arrest growth in the G 1 phase of the cell cycle. Despite its heterotrimeric (abc) structure, intracellular expression of its smallest subunit, the c-toxin, is alone responsible for the G 1 arrest. The a subunit, however, has a chitinase activity that is essential for holozymocin action from the cell exterior. Here we show that sensitive yeast cells can be rescued from zymocin treatment by exogenously applying crude chitin preparations, supporting the idea that chitin polymers can compete for binding to zymocin with chitin present on the surface of sensitive yeast cells. Consistent with this, holozymocin can be purified by way of affinity chromatography using an immobilized chitin matrix. PCR-mediated deletions of chitin synthesis (CHS) genes show that most, if not all, genetic scenarios that lead to complete loss (chs3D), blocked export (chs7D) or reduced activation (chs4D), combined with mislocalization (chs4Dchs5D; chs4Dchs6D; chs4Dchs5Dchs6D) of chitin synthase III activity (CSIII), render cells refractory to the inhibitory effects of exozymocin. In contrast, deletions in CHS1 and CHS2, which code for CSI and CSII, respectively, have no effect on zymocin sensitivity. Thus, CSIII-polymerized chitin, which amounts to almost 90% of the cell's chitin resources, appears to be the carbohydrate receptor required for the initial interaction of zymocin with sensitive cells.
Based on studies in yeast and mammalian cells the Elongator complex has been implicated in functions as diverse as histone acetylation, polarized protein trafficking and tRNA modification. Here we show that Arabidopsis mutants lacking the Elongator subunit AtELP3/ELO3 have a defect in tRNA wobble uridine modification. Moreover, we demonstrate that yeast elp3 and elp1 mutants expressing the respective Arabidopsis Elongator homologues AtELP3/ELO3 and AtELP1/ELO2 assemble integer Elongator complexes indicating a high degree of structural conservation. Surprisingly, in vivo complementation studies based on Elongator-dependent tRNA nonsense suppression and zymocin tRNase toxin assays indicated that while AtELP1 rescued defects of a yeast elp1 mutant, the most conserved Elongator gene AtELP3, failed to complement an elp3 mutant. This lack of complementation is due to incompatibility with yeast ELP1 as coexpression of both plant genes in an elp1 elp3 yeast mutant restored Elongator's tRNA modification function in vivo. Similarly, AtELP1, not ScELP1 also supported partial complementation by yeast–plant Elp3 hybrids suggesting that AtElp1 has less stringent sequence requirements for Elp3 than ScElp1. We conclude that yeast and plant Elongator share tRNA modification roles and propose that this function might be conserved in Elongator from all eukaryotic kingdoms of life.
SummaryIn yeast, the role for the Elongator complex in tRNA anticodon modification is affected by phosphorylation of Elongator subunit Elp1. Thus, hyperphosphorylation of Elp1 due to inactivation of protein phosphatase Sit4 correlates with Elongator-minus phenotypes including resistance towards zymocin, a tRNase cleaving anticodons of Elongator-dependent tRNAs. Here we show that zymocin resistance of casein kinase hrr25 mutants associates with hypophosphorylation of Elp1 and that nonsense suppression by the Elongator-dependent SUP4 tRNA is abolished in hrr25 or sit4 mutants. Thus changes that perturb the evenly balanced ratio between hyper-and hypophosphorylated Elp1 forms present in wild-type cells lead to Elongator inactivation. Antagonistic roles for Hrr25 and Sit4 in Elongator function are further supported by our data that Sit4 inactivation is capable of restoring both zymocin sensitivity and normal ratios between the two Elp1 forms in hrr25 mutants. Hrr25 binds to Elongator in a fashion dependent on Elongator partner Kti12. Like sit4 mutants, overexpression of Kti12 triggers Elp1 hyperphosphorylation. Intriguingly, this effect of Kti12 is blocked by hrr25 mutations, which also show enhanced binding of Kti12 to Elongator. Collectively, our data suggest that rather than directly targeting Elp1, the Hrr25 kinase indirectly affects Elp1 phosphorylation states through control of Sit4-dependent dephosphorylation of Elp1.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.