We evaluated 147 patients with adequate color Doppler and angiographic studies for mitral regurgitation. Sixty-five patients had no mitral regurgitation by both color Doppler and angiography and 82 patients had mitral regurgitation by both techniques. Thus the sensitivity and specificity of color Doppler for the detection of mitral regurgitation was 100%. Materials and methodsThe original study consisted of 160 patients. However, 13 were excluded, eight because of poor acoustic window and inadequate echocardiographic images of the left atrium and five because of the presence of multiple premature ventricular contractions at the time of angiography, making the quantitation of mitral regurgitation impossible. Thus a total of 147 patients who had adequate color Doppler and angiographic examinations form the basis of this study. There were 79 men and 68 women, ranging in age from 17 to 84 years (mean 56). Eighty-two patients had mitral regurgitation by angiography, and the remaining 65 demonstrated normal mitral valvular function. The etiology of mitral regurgitation was ischemic heart disease in 34 rheumatic heart disease in 24, congestive cardiomyopathy in 13, and mitral valve prolapse in 11. Thirty-one of the 82 patients with mitral regurgitation were in atrial fibrillation and the remaining were in normal sinus rhythm. None of the patients without mitral regurgitation were in atrial fibrillation.

No abstract

Background. The value of transesophageal echocardiography in the assessment of patients with aortic dissection was studied.Methods and Results. Group 1 (34 patients) represented all patients studied at our institution with this technique in whom aortic dissection was proven by aortography, surgery, or autopsy. Group 2 (27 patients) represented all patients studied with this technique at our institution in whom aortic dissection was excluded by aortography. Transesophageal echocardiography made a correct diagnosis of aortic dissection in 33 of 34 patients (sensitivity, 97%; specificity, 100%). It also correctly demonstrated the type of dissection in all 29 patients with aortographic or surgical proof. On the other hand, computed tomography scanning, performed in 24 of 34 patients in group 1, made a correct diagnosis in only 67% of patients and misclassified the type of dissection in 33%. Transesophageal echocardiography correctly identified involvement of the coronary arteries by aortic dissection in six of seven patients as well as absence of both left and right coronary artery involvement in 10 patients with aortic dissection. This technique was also useful in detecting communications between the true and false lumens, presence of thrombi in the false lumen, and, in two patients, localized dissection rupture with formation of a false aneurysm. In both groups 1 and 2, transesophageal echocardiography correctly identified patients with moderate to severe aortic regurgitation.Conclusions. Transesophageal echocardiography is very useful in the assessment of aortic dissection. (Circulation 1991;84:1903-1914

To assess the usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography in the evaluation of proximal coronary artery stenosis, 111 consecutive patients (mean age 61 years) who had intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography and coronary angiography within 1 week of surgery were studied. Transesophageal echocardiography visualized the entire length of the left main artery (0.2 to 2.2 cm, mean 0.93), 0.2 to 2.2 cm of the proximal left anterior descending artery and 0.1 to 3.4 cm of the proximal left circumflex artery in 103 patients (93%) and 0.1 to 4.6 cm of the proximal right coronary artery in 55 patients (49%). In the coronary artery segments visualized by echocardiography and compared with the corresponding angiographic segments, transesophageal echocardiography correctly identified 23 (96%) of 24 left main stenoses, 11 (78%) of 14 stenoses involving the left anterior descending artery, 6 (75%) of 8 left circumflex stenoses and all 7 stenoses (100%) of the right coronary artery. In all seven patients with ostial stenosis (left main artery in five and right coronary artery in two), the condition was correctly diagnosed by this technique. The sensitivity and specificity of transesophageal echocardiography in the overall evaluation of proximal coronary artery stenosis as customarily defined by angiography were 96% and 99% for the left main artery, 48% and 99% for the left anterior descending artery, 67% and 100% for the left circumflex artery and 37% and 100% for the right coronary artery, respectively. The distance of the stenotic lesion from the origin of the vessel by transesophageal echocardiography also correlated well with that measured by angiography (r = 0.63 to 0.99).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

KM is noninferior to an ELR for detecting arrhythmias in the outpatient setting. The ease of use and portability of this device make it an attractive option for the detection of symptomatic arrhythmias.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract