The additive manufacturing of metals requires optimisation to find the melting conditions that give the desired material properties. A key aspect of the optimisation is minimising the porosity that forms during the melting process. A corresponding analysis of pores of different types (e.g. lack of fusion or keyholes) is therefore desirable. Knowing that pores form under different thermal conditions allows greater insight into the optimisation process. In this work, two pore classification methods were trialled: unsupervised machine learning and defined limits. These methods were applied to 3D pore data from X-ray computed tomography and 2D pore data from micrographs. Data were collected from multiple alloys (Ti-6Al-4V, Inconel 718, Ti-5553 and Haynes 282). Machine learning was found to be the most useful for 3D pore data and defined limits for the 2D pore data; the latter worked by optimising the limits using energy densities.

This is a copy of the published version, or version of record, available on the publisher's website. This version does not track changes, errata, or withdrawals on the publisher's site.

This is a copy of the published version, or version of record, available on the publisher's website. This version does not track changes, errata, or withdrawals on the publisher's site.

No abstract

Fabricating mirrors using additive manufacturing (AM; 3D printing) is a promising yet under-researched production route. There are several issues that need to be better understood before AM can be fully adopted to fabricate mirror substrates. A significant obstacle to AM adoption is the presence of porosity and the influence that has on the resultant optical proprieties. Several batches of high-silicon aluminium (AlSi10Mg) samples were created to investigate the relationships laser parameters, laser paths and build orientations have with the porosity. The results showed that eliminating defects relies on a complex interaction of the process parameters and material properties, with the residual heating from the laser proving to be a significant factor. In addition, the use of a hot isostatic press is investigated and some full prototypes of the Cassegrain CubeSat were produced.

In this paper we are exploring the possibilities of 3D printing in the fabrication of mirrors for astronomy. Taking the advantages of 3D printing to solve the existing problems caused by traditional manufacturing, two proof-ofconcept mirror fabrication strategies are investigated in this paper. The first concept is a deformable mirror with embedded actuator supports system to minimise errors caused by the bonding interfaces during mirror assembly. The second concept is the adaption of the Stress Mirror Polishing (SMP) technique to a variety of mirror shapes by implemented a printed thickness distribution on the back side of the mirror. Design investigations and prototypes plans are presented for both studies.

This is a copy of the published version, or version of record, available on the publisher's website. This version does not track changes, errata, or withdrawals on the publisher's site.

Lightweight, aluminum, freeform prototype mirrors have been designed and fabricated by a Thai led team, with UK support, for intended applications within the Thai Space Consortium (TSC) satellite series. The project motivation was to explore the different design strategies and fabrication steps enabled by both conventional (mill, drill, and lathe) and additive (3D printing) manufacture of the prototype substrates. Single Point Diamond Turning was used to convert the substrates into mirrors and optical metrology was used to evaluate the different mirror surfaces.The prototype criteria originated from the TSC-1 satellite tertiary mirror, which is designed to minimize the effect of Seidel aberrations before the beam enters the hyperspectral imager. To converge upon the prototype designs, Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was used to evaluate the different physical conditions experienced by the prototypes during manufacture and how these influence the optical performance. The selected designs satisfied the mass and surface displacement criteria of the prototype and were adapted to either the conventional or additive manufacturing process. This paper will present the prototype design process, substrate manufacture, optical fabrication, and an interferometric evaluation of the optical surfaces comparing the conventional and additive manufacturing processes.