In patients with advanced ovarian cancer, a chemotherapy regimen consisting of carboplatin plus paclitaxel results in less toxicity, is easier to administer, and is not inferior, when compared with cisplatin plus paclitaxel.
Age, PS, tumor histology, and residual tumor volume were independent predictors of prognosis in patients with stage III EOC. These data can be used to identify patients with poor prognosis and to design future tailored randomized clinical trials.
Purpose: mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) plays a central role in regulating cell growth and cell cycle progression and is regarded as a promising therapeutic target. We examined whether mTOR inhibition by RAD001 (everolimus) is therapeutically efficacious in the treatment of ovarian cancer as a single agent and in combination with cisplatin. Experimental Design: Using four human ovarian cancer cell lines, we determined the effect of RAD001 by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide, Western blot, and apoptosis assays. We evaluated the association between phospho-AKT/mTOR activity and RAD001sensitivity. We also determined the effect of RAD001on tumor growth and malignancy using mice inoculated with human ovarian cancer cells. Results: RAD001markedly inhibited cell proliferation of human ovarian carcinoma cells with high AKT activity (OVCAR10 and SKOV-3), but the effect was minimal in cells with low AKT activity (OVCAR4 and OVCAR5). Sensitivity to RAD001was independent of p53 expression. RAD001 inhibited the phosphorylation of downstream 4E-BP1 and p70S6 kinase and attenuated the expression of Myc. RAD001 also attenuated the expression of HIF-1a and vascular endothelial growth factor, important factors in angiogenesis and tumor invasiveness. RAD001 enhanced cisplatin-induced apoptosis in cells with high AKT/mTOR activity, with minimal effect in cells with low AKT-mTOR activity. Mouse xenografts of SKOV-3 cells revealed that RAD001inhibits tumor growth, angiogenesis, and i.p. dissemination and ascites production and prolongs survival. Moreover, treatment with RAD001significantly enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of cisplatin in vivo. Conclusion: These results indicate that RAD001 could have therapeutic efficacy in human ovarian cancers with hyperactivated AKT/mTOR signaling.
Eight patients with refractory ovarian cancer were treated on a pilot protocol of verapamil plus Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH). This trial was based on our previous laboratory studies which demonstrated that Adriamycin resistance in human ovarian cancer cell lines could be partially reversed by exposure of the cells to high concentrations of verapamil (3,000 ng/mL). Patients were treated in an intensive care unit with continuous cardiovascular monitoring. The dose of verapamil was escalated in each patient until hypotension or heart block developed, and this dose was maintained for 72 hours. Adriamycin (50 mg/m2) was infused over 24 hours during the second day of the verapamil infusion and verapamil alone was administered on the third day in an effort to block efflux from drug-resistant cells. This intensive approach led to a median plasma verapamil level of 1,273 ng/mL (range, 720 to 2,767). However, the high infusion rates of verapamil (9 micrograms/kg/min) required to achieve these plasma levels produced an unacceptable degree of cardiac toxicity. Two patients developed transient atropine-responsive complete heart block and four patients developed transient congestive heart failure with increases in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. There was no evidence that the noncardiac toxicities of Adriamycin were enhanced by verapamil. There were no objective responses to therapy. Future studies should use less cardiotoxic calcium channel blockers that can be safely administered to produce the plasma levels required for in vitro sensitization of drug resistant cells.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.