2003
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2003.02.153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Phase III Trial of Carboplatin and Paclitaxel Compared With Cisplatin and Paclitaxel in Patients With Optimally Resected Stage III Ovarian Cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

Abstract: In patients with advanced ovarian cancer, a chemotherapy regimen consisting of carboplatin plus paclitaxel results in less toxicity, is easier to administer, and is not inferior, when compared with cisplatin plus paclitaxel.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

21
1,158
2
22

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,864 publications
(1,208 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
21
1,158
2
22
Order By: Relevance
“…It is now well established that first-line treatment should include a platinum compound (Harries and Gore, 2002), with carboplatin being the drug of choice, having been shown to have equivalent efficacy but less toxicity than cisplatin (Alberts, 1995;Du Bois et al, 1999;Ozols et al, 2003). Two large randomised studies in the 1990s of first-line therapy for ovarian cancer showed a survival benefit when a paclitaxel -platinum combination was compared with the previous standard of cyclophosphamidecisplatin; therefore, the combination of platinum and paclitaxel became standard first-line therapy (McGuire et al, 1996;Piccart et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now well established that first-line treatment should include a platinum compound (Harries and Gore, 2002), with carboplatin being the drug of choice, having been shown to have equivalent efficacy but less toxicity than cisplatin (Alberts, 1995;Du Bois et al, 1999;Ozols et al, 2003). Two large randomised studies in the 1990s of first-line therapy for ovarian cancer showed a survival benefit when a paclitaxel -platinum combination was compared with the previous standard of cyclophosphamidecisplatin; therefore, the combination of platinum and paclitaxel became standard first-line therapy (McGuire et al, 1996;Piccart et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When looking at survival by subgroup, IP therapy was found to be beneficial both for patients with visible disease (about 2/3 of patients) and for patients with microscopic disease, with overall survival relative risk of 0.77 and 0.69, respectively. When looking at negative second look rates in GOG-172 and other GOG studies in optimal ovarian cancer (GOG-104, GOG-158 [24], and GOG-172), the negative second look rate in the IP arm in GOG-104 was 47% as compared to the 57% negative second look rare in the IP arm of GOG-172. The intravenous treatment groups from these studies showed a 36% negative second look rate in GOG-104, 46% in GOG-158, and a comparable 41% in GOG-172.…”
Section: Gog-172mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The accepted standard is 6 cycles of platinum-based combination chemotherapy, with a platinum (carboplatin or cisplatin) and a taxane (paclitaxel or docetaxel) [52][53][54][55][56]. Docetaxel may be considered in selected patients as it has less neurotoxicity, but it is more myelosuppressive than paclitaxel [52].…”
Section: Chemotherapy For Advanced Stage Ovarian Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%