Using data for 25,780 species categorized on the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List, we present an assessment of the status of the world’s vertebrates. One-fifth of species are classified as Threatened, and we show that this figure is increasing: On average, 52 species of mammals, birds, and amphibians move one category closer to extinction each year. However, this overall pattern conceals the impact of conservation successes, and we show that the rate of deterioration would have been at least one-fifth again as much in the absence of these. Nonetheless, current conservation efforts remain insufficient to offset the main drivers of biodiversity loss in these groups: agricultural expansion, logging, overexploitation, and invasive alien species
Amphibians tend to exhibit conservative morphological evolution, and the application of molecular and bioacoustic tools in systematic studies have been effective at revealing morphologically 'cryptic' species within taxa that were previously considered to be a single species. We report molecular genetic findings on two forest-dwelling ranid frogs from localities across Southeast Asia, and show that sympatric evolutionary lineages of morphologically cryptic frogs are a common pattern. These findings imply that species diversity of Southeast Asian frogs remains significantly underestimated, and taken in concert with other molecular investigations, suggest there may not be any geographically widespread, forest-dwelling frog species in the region. Accurate assessments of diversity and distributions are needed to mitigate extinctions of evolutionary lineages in these threatened vertebrates.
In adjacent areas of broadleaf evergreen forest, deciduous dipterocarp forest, and agricultural land in northeastern Thailand, >4,000 individuals of 105 species of reptiles and amphibians were systematically collected. The position of capture of each individual was recorded in terms of a complex microhabitat code. The 3 environments differ substantially in pattern of human disturbance, in vegetation structure, and in range and predictability of temperature and total evaporation, the evergreen forest having the most buffered climate near the ground.Of the 3 environments studied, the evergreen forest has the most diverse and distinct herpetofauna, and the largest percentage of autochthonous species. The evergreen forest community has more southern or tropical affinities, while the deciduous forest community has more northern affinities.Analysis of the use of microhabitat categories by coexisting species reveals significant differences, even among the most similar sets of species. Differences in species richness among the three communities are not explained by differences in microhabitat diversity, mean niche breadth, or mean niche overlap. However, an ith nearest neighbor analysis of the dispersion of niche centers in resource space reveals closer packing and larger and more distinct guilds in the evergreen forest: the environment richest in species and the most predictable in climate. Both a graphical treatment and an analysis of sets of species grouped a priori according to their general natural history confirm the existence of larger and significantly tighter guilds in the evergreen forest.It is suggested that unpredictable environments tend to prevent the formation of distinct guilds, while the greater species richness of more predictable environments may be a function of guild formation.
Aim We seek to relate the present distributions of frogs and snakes of Sundaland and the known geological history of the region. Location From the Isthmus of Kra to Java and Sulawesi. Methods We relate the known ecological requirements of frogs and snakes to their geographical distributions and information on geological history. Results Microhabitat requirements for larvae of various groups of frogs are strong predictors of the breadth of their geographical distributions. At the species level, the frog faunas of the Malay Peninsula and Sumatra are the most similar. The Sulawesi frog fauna, mainly derived from Sundaland lineages, shows almost no similarity to the other frog faunas at the species level. The ecological zones occupied by snake species show association with the breadth of their geographical distributions There are only minor differences among similarity ratios for the Malay Peninsula–Sumatran, Malay Peninsula–Borneo, and the Borneo–Sumatra pairs. The Sulawesi snake fauna has distinctly lower similarity with the faunas of the other areas. The similarity ratios between faunas are larger for snakes than for frogs. This difference between the two groups reflects the difference between them in ability to cross salt water barriers, frogs being extremely vulnerable to saline water. Also snakes may establish founder populations more easily as a single gravid female or one carrying stored sperm may introduce a clutch into previously unoccupied territory. Conclusions A few species of frogs and snakes probably reached their present, almost ubiquitous distributions in Sundaland within the last few millenia or even more recently. Other widely distributed species may have been able to disperse among land masses within Sundaland until 10,000–17,000 yr BP; the frogs of this category are common in environments that almost certainly characterized the exposed area of the South China Sea. The distributions of other frogs common to the Malay Peninsula, Sumatra and Borneo probably antedate the Pleistocene, as their larval development requires hilly topography which was not generally available on the Pleistocene‐exposed bed of the South China Sea. Many of the endemic species of frogs and snakes probably owe their origins to events of the Miocene or earlier. Several genera of frogs and one genus of snakes have undergone extensive speciation and display considerable sympatry and elevational stratification of species, suggesting their present distributions are the result of events as old as the Eocene. We have cast these conclusions in the form of hypotheses that can be tested mainly by the use of molecular genetics, but in some cases, by additional field sampling.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.