No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

In the embryonic zebra fish as early as 40 hr after fertilization, the Mauthner cells (M-cells) initiate an escape response, elicited by tactile-vibrational stimulation. The initial part of this behavior is similar to the acoustic startle reflex seen during the larval stage which begins at 96 hr. The embryonic response is directional and is followed by a series of strong tail flexures which are more pronounced than those during swimming. In the embryo the M-cell fired at the beginning of the response and rarely fired again during subsequent contractions; in our experiments the M-cell did not mediate iterative movements of the tail. The M-cell system is probably involved in evoked hatching behavior, as the tactile response is sufficient to rupture the egg membrane and allow the animal to escape. The M-cell sometimes fired spontaneously, which suggests that it might function also in spontaneous hatching behavior which occurs in the absence of phasic stimulation. At 48 hr the M-cell has morphologically mature synapses on its soma and dendrites, but its cytoplasm is relatively undifferentiated; it has few oriented neurofilaments and no distinct axon hillock. During these stages the extracellular M-spike is longer in duration and smaller in amplitude than at later times when the cell is more mature morphologically. Our data suggest that long-term inhibitory control of the M-cell system begins to function at about the time of hatching. At this time the cell is morphologically mature and is richly supplied with synaptic endings over its soma and dendrites.

The Mauthner neurons have become synonymous with the C start evasive response of fishes. C starts are a two-part movement pattern. First, the fish bends its body so that it has a C-like profile (stage 1) when viewed from above. Second, the fish rapidly accelerates away from its starting position (stage 2). Until recently, it has not been possible to determine the contribution of Mauthner cell activity to the expression of this behavior. In this paper we focus on three of our recent papers that address this issue. Our work combines high-speed digital image analysis of the C start with chronic Mauthner cell and electromyographic recordings, lesions of the Mauthner cells, and stimulation of single Mauthner axons in swimming fishes. This work shows that the firing of the Mauthner cell results in a short-latency body contraction that orients the initial stage of the C start away from the direction of the threatening stimulus. The direction of the escape trajectory, however, is more finely tuned to stimulus angle than can be explained by the firing of just the Mauthner cell and its postsynaptic followers. Precise control of trajectory must, therefore, require participation of other neurons. These neurons together with the Mauthner cell form a system that we term the brain stem escape network. We have identified candidate neurons of this network which can now be studied at the single-cell level. Because of both its accessibility for neurophysiological study and its neuroanatomical simplicity, we assert that the brain stem escape network is a useful preparation for understanding fundamental processes of sensorimotor integration in the brain stem.