Background:The 21-item Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ-R21) is a scale that measures three domains of eating behavior: cognitive restraint (CR), uncontrolled eating (UE) and emotional eating (EE). Objectives: To assess the factor structure and reliability of TFEQ-R21 (and if necessary, refine the structure) in diverse populations of obese and non-obese individuals. Design: Data were obtained from obese adults in a United States/Canadian clinical trial (n ¼ 1741), and overweight, obese and normal weight adults in a US web-based survey (n ¼ 1275). Confirmatory factor analyses were employed to investigate the structure of TFEQ-R21 using baseline data from the clinical trial. The model was refined to obtain adequate fit and internal consistency. The refined model was then tested using the web-based data. Relationships between TFEQ domains and body mass index (BMI) were examined in both populations. Results: Clinical data indicated that TFEQ-R21 needed refinement. Three items were removed from the CR domain, producing the revised version TFEQ-R18V2 (Comparative Fit Index (CFI) ¼ 0.91). Testing TFEQ-R18V2 in the web-based sample supported the revised structure (CFI ¼ 0.96; Cronbach's coefficient a of 0.78-0.94). Associations with BMI were small. In the clinical study, the CR domain showed a significant and negative association with BMI. On the basis of the web-based survey, it was shown that the relationship between BMI and CR is population-dependent (obese versus non-obese, healthy versus diabetics). Conclusions: In two independent datasets, the TFEQ-R18V2 showed robust factor structure and good reliability. It may provide a useful tool for characterizing UE, CR and EE.
Background: The Power of Food Scale (PFS) was developed to assess the psychological impact of today's food-abundant environments. Objective: To evaluate the structure of the PFS in diverse populations of obese and nonobese individuals. Design: Data were obtained from obese adults in a clinical trial for a weight management drug (n ¼ 1741), and overweight, obese and normal weight adults in a Web-based survey (n ¼ 1275). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to investigate the PFS structure using the clinical data. The model developed was then tested using the Web-based data. Relationships between PFS domains and body mass index (BMI) were examined. Logistic regression was used in the Web-based survey to evaluate the association between obesity status and PFS scores. Results: Clinical data indicated that the scale was best represented by a 15-item version with three subscale domains and an aggregate domain (average of three domains); this was confirmed with data from the Web-based survey (Comparative Fit Index: 0.95 and 0.94 for the clinical and Web-based studies, respectively). Cronbach's a for both data sets was high, ranging from 0.81 to 0.91. The relationships between BMI and each domain were weak (and approximately linear). A full category increase in PFS domain score (range 1-5) increased the odds of being obese 1.6-2.3 times. Conclusions: The 15-item PFS is best represented by three domains and an aggregate domain. The PFS may provide a useful tool to evaluate the effects of obesity treatments on feelings of being controlled by food in an obesogenic food environment.
A structured review of published papers was done to assess the efficacy and safety of fasciectomy and fasciotomy in European patients with Dupuytren's contracture. The outcomes varied across 48 studies. For fasciectomy, outcomes and results were as follows: the proportions of patients with a 100% correction in contracture angle ranged from 61 to 97%, the mean improvement in contracture angle ranged from 58 to 79%, and cases judged excellent/good ranged from 63 to 90%. Fasciotomy had similar outcomes, with a mean improvement in contracture angle ranging from 46 to 88%. Immediate failures upon recovery were reported for both procedures. The average recurrence rates were 39% after a fasciectomy and 62% after a fasciotomy at a median time of about 4 years. Overall, about 20% of fasciectomy and fasciotomy patients experienced an adverse event. In summary, postoperative outcomes were successful, but surgical complications were common and recurrence of a contracture was likely within a few years.
Pfizer Global Research and Development.
Objective. To our knowledge, no functional outcome measure has been developed and validated for Dupuytren's disease. We aimed to develop and validate a patient-reported functional outcome measure for Dupuytren's disease. Methods. Patients with Dupuytren's disease (n ؍ 9) and medical experts (n ؍ 7) provided input and opinions about limiting activities that were difficult to perform because of Dupuytren's disease for item generation. The provisional scale was studied in an independent sample of patients (n ؍ 85) for item reduction according to response distribution, reliability, redundancy, and loading in a 1-factor solution. The final scale was evaluated as follows: reliability using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient from the previous 85-patient population, and construct validity and responsiveness after needle aponeurotomy in another independent 53-patient sample. For construct validity, convergent validity and divergent validity were tested. The clinically important change was estimated relative to a 1-point categorical change on the Tubiana scale. Results. A 52-item provisional scale was generated and reduced to the final 9-item scale called the Unité Rhumatologique des Affections de la Main (URAM) scale (total score 0 -45). The scale showed good to excellent reliability and suitable construct validity. The URAM score improved after needle aponeurotomy: the standardized effect size was 0.56. The estimated clinically important change of the URAM scale was 2.9 points. Conclusion. We provide the first patient-reported functional measure for Dupuytren's disease. The URAM scale demonstrated suitable psychometric properties, and is short and convenient enough for easy use in daily practice and in clinical studies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.