Classical research has suggested that early palate formation develops via epithelial-mesenchymal interactions, and in this study we reveal which signals control this process. Using Fgf10 -/-, FGF receptor 2b -/-(Fgfr2b -/-), and Sonic hedgehog (Shh) mutant mice, which all exhibit cleft palate, we show that Shh is a downstream target of Fgf10/Fgfr2b signaling. Our results demonstrate that mesenchymal Fgf10 regulates the epithelial expression of Shh, which in turn signals back to the mesenchyme. This was confirmed by demonstrating that cell proliferation is decreased not only in the palatal epithelium but also in the mesenchyme of Fgfr2b -/-mice. These results reveal a new role for Fgf signaling in mammalian palate development. We show that coordinated epithelial-mesenchymal interactions are essential during the initial stages of palate development and require an Fgf-Shh signaling network.

No abstract

Calvarial bones form by direct ossification of mesenchyme. This requires condensation of mesenchymal cells which then proliferate and differentiate into osteoblasts. Congenital hydrocephalus (ch) mutant mice lack the forkhead/winged helix transcription factor Foxc1. In ch mutant mice, calvarial bones remain rudimentary at the sites of initial osteogenic condensations. In this study, we have localized the ossification defect in ch mutants to the calvarial mesenchyme, which lacks the expression of transcription factors Msx2 and Alx4. This lack of expression is associated with a reduction in the proliferation of osteoprogenitor cells. We have previously shown that BMP induces Msx2 in calvarial mesenchyme (Development 125, 1241-1251, 1998). Here, we show that BMP also induces Alx4 in this tissue. We also show that BMP-induced expression of Msx2 and Alx4 requires Foxc1. We therefore suggest that Foxc1 regulates BMP-mediated osteoprogenitor proliferation and that this regulation is required for the progression of osteogenesis beyond the initial condensations in calvarial bone development.

Classical research has suggested that early palate formation develops via epithelial-mesenchymal interactions, and in this study we reveal which signals control this process. Using Fgf10 -/-, FGF receptor 2b -/-(Fgfr2b -/-), and Sonic hedgehog (Shh) mutant mice, which all exhibit cleft palate, we show that Shh is a downstream target of Fgf10/Fgfr2b signaling. Our results demonstrate that mesenchymal Fgf10 regulates the epithelial expression of Shh, which in turn signals back to the mesenchyme. This was confirmed by demonstrating that cell proliferation is decreased not only in the palatal epithelium but also in the mesenchyme of Fgfr2b -/-mice. These results reveal a new role for Fgf signaling in mammalian palate development. We show that coordinated epithelial-mesenchymal interactions are essential during the initial stages of palate development and require an Fgf-Shh signaling network.

Little is known about the regulation of cell fate decisions that lead to the formation of five pairs of mammary placodes in the surface ectoderm of the mouse embryo. We have previously shown that fibroblast growth factor 10 (FGF10) is required for the formation of mammary placodes 1, 2, 3 and 5. Here, we have found that Fgf10 is expressed only in the somites underlying placodes 2 and 3, in gradients across and within these somites. To test whether somitic FGF10 is required for the formation of these two placodes, we analyzed a number of mutants with different perturbations of somitic Fgf10 gradients for the presence of WNT signals and ectodermal multilayering, markers for mammary line and placode formation. The mammary line is displaced dorsally, and formation of placode 3 is impaired in Pax3 ILZ/ILZ mutants, which do not form ventral somitic buds. Mammary line formation is impaired and placode 3 is absent in Gli3Xt-J/Xt-J and hypomorphic Fgf10 mutants, in which the somitic Fgf10 gradient is shortened dorsally and less overall Fgf10 is expressed, respectively. Recombinant FGF10 rescued mammogenesis in Fgf10 -/-and Gli3Xt-J/Xt-J flanks. We correlate increasing levels of somitic FGF10 with progressive maturation of the surface ectoderm, and show that full expression of somitic Fgf10, co-regulated by GLI3, is required for the anteroposterior pattern in which the flank ectoderm acquires a mammary epithelial identity. We propose that the intra-somitic Fgf10 gradient, together with ventral elongation of the somites, determines the correct dorsoventral position of mammary epithelium along the flank.

Runx2 (Cbfa1) is a runt domain transcription factor that is essential for bone development and tooth morphogenesis. Teeth form as ectodermal appendages and their development is regulated by interactions between the epithelium and mesenchyme. We have shown previously that Runx2 is expressed in the dental mesenchyme and regulated by FGF signals from the epithelium, and that tooth development arrests at late bud stage in Runx2 knockout mice [Development 126 (1999) 2911]. In the present study, we have continued to clarify the role of Runx2 in tooth development and searched for downstream targets of Runx2 by extensive in situ hybridization analysis. The expression of Fgf3 was downregulated in the mesenchyme of Runx2 mutant teeth. FGF-soaked beads failed to induce Fgf3 expression in Runx2 mutant dental mesenchyme whereas in wild-type mesenchyme they induced Fgf3 in all explants indicating a requirement of Runx2 for transduction of FGF signals. Fgf3 was absent also in cultured Runx2-/- calvarial cells and it was induced by overexpression of Runx2. Furthermore, Runx2 was downregulated in Msx1 mutant tooth germs, indicating that it functions in the dental mesenchyme between Msx1 and Fgf3. Shh expression was absent from the epithelial enamel knot in lower molars of Runx2 mutant and reduced in upper molars. However, other enamel knot marker genes were expressed normally in mutant upper molars, while reduced or missing in lower molars. These differences between mutant upper and lower molars may be explained by the substitution of Runx2 function by Runx3, another member of the runt gene family that was upregulated in upper but not lower molars of Runx2 mutants. Shh expression in mutant enamel knots was not rescued by FGFs in vitro, indicating that in addition to Fgf3, Runx2 regulates other mesenchymal genes required for early tooth morphogenesis. Also, exogenous FGF and SHH did not rescue the morphogenesis of Runx2 mutant molars. We conclude that Runx2 mediates the functions of epithelial FGF signals regulating Fgf3 expression in the dental mesenchyme and that Fgf3 may be a direct target gene of Runx2.

No abstract

No abstract