No abstract

Mammalian tooth forms are produced during development by folding of the enamel epithelium but the molecular mechanisms involved in the formation and patterning of tooth cusps are not understood. We now report that several key signaling molecules found in well-known vertebrate signaling tissues such as the node, the notochord, the apical ectodermal ridge, and the zone of polarizing activity in the limb bud are specifically expressed in cells of the enamel knot, which is a transient cluster of dental epithelial cells. By comparing three-dimensional reconstructions of serial sections following in situ hybridization we localized Sonic hedgehog, Bone morphogenetic proteins-2, -4 and -7, as well as Fibroblast growth factor-4 in nested domains within the enamel knot. We suggest that the enamel knot acts as a signaling or organizing center, which provides positional information for tooth morphogenesis and regulates the growth of tooth cusps.

Ectodermal dysplasia syndromes affect the development of several organs, including hair, teeth, and glands. The recent cloning of two genes responsible for these syndromes has led to the identification of a novel TNF family ligand, ectodysplasin, and TNF receptor, edar. This has indicated a developmental regulatory role for TNFs for the first time. Our in situ hybridization analysis of the expression of ectodysplasin (encoded by the Tabby gene) and edar (encoded by the downless gene) during mouse tooth morphogenesis showed that they are expressed in complementary patterns exclusively in ectodermal tissue layer. Edar was expressed reiteratively in signaling centers regulating key steps in morphogenesis. The analysis of the effects of eight signaling molecules in the TGFbeta, FGF, Hh, Wnt, and EGF families in tooth explant cultures revealed that the expression of edar was induced by activinbetaA, whereas Wnt6 induced ectodysplasin expression. Moreover, ectodysplasin expression was downregulated in branchial arch epithelium and in tooth germs of Lef1 mutant mice, suggesting that signaling by ectodysplasin is regulated by LEF-1-mediated Wnt signals. The analysis of the signaling centers in tooth germs of Tabby mice (ectodysplasin null mutants) indicated that in the absence of ectodysplasin the signaling centers were small. However, no downstream targets of ectodysplasin signaling were identified among several genes expressed in the signaling centers. We conclude that ectodysplasin functions as a planar signal between ectodermal compartments and regulates the function, but not the induction, of epithelial signaling centers. This TNF signaling is tightly associated with epithelial-mesenchymal interactions and with other signaling pathways regulating organogenesis. We suggest that activin signaling from mesenchyme induces the expression of the TNF receptor edar in the epithelial signaling centers, thus making them responsive to Wnt-induced ectodysplasin from the nearby ectoderm. This is the first demonstration of integration of the Wnt, activin, and TNF signaling pathways.

Runx2 (Cbfa1) is a runt domain transcription factor that is essential for bone development and tooth morphogenesis. Teeth form as ectodermal appendages and their development is regulated by interactions between the epithelium and mesenchyme. We have shown previously that Runx2 is expressed in the dental mesenchyme and regulated by FGF signals from the epithelium, and that tooth development arrests at late bud stage in Runx2 knockout mice [Development 126 (1999) 2911]. In the present study, we have continued to clarify the role of Runx2 in tooth development and searched for downstream targets of Runx2 by extensive in situ hybridization analysis. The expression of Fgf3 was downregulated in the mesenchyme of Runx2 mutant teeth. FGF-soaked beads failed to induce Fgf3 expression in Runx2 mutant dental mesenchyme whereas in wild-type mesenchyme they induced Fgf3 in all explants indicating a requirement of Runx2 for transduction of FGF signals. Fgf3 was absent also in cultured Runx2-/- calvarial cells and it was induced by overexpression of Runx2. Furthermore, Runx2 was downregulated in Msx1 mutant tooth germs, indicating that it functions in the dental mesenchyme between Msx1 and Fgf3. Shh expression was absent from the epithelial enamel knot in lower molars of Runx2 mutant and reduced in upper molars. However, other enamel knot marker genes were expressed normally in mutant upper molars, while reduced or missing in lower molars. These differences between mutant upper and lower molars may be explained by the substitution of Runx2 function by Runx3, another member of the runt gene family that was upregulated in upper but not lower molars of Runx2 mutants. Shh expression in mutant enamel knots was not rescued by FGFs in vitro, indicating that in addition to Fgf3, Runx2 regulates other mesenchymal genes required for early tooth morphogenesis. Also, exogenous FGF and SHH did not rescue the morphogenesis of Runx2 mutant molars. We conclude that Runx2 mediates the functions of epithelial FGF signals regulating Fgf3 expression in the dental mesenchyme and that Fgf3 may be a direct target gene of Runx2.

Classic studies on experimental embryology have shown that organ development in an embryo is largely regulated by so called inductive tissue interactions which mostly take place between epithelial and mesenchymal tissues. Also in the developing tooth, both morphogenesis and cell differentiation are governed by such interactions. Characteristic features of epithelial-mesenchymal interactions are that they are sequential and reciprocal, i.e. "induction" appears to consist of a chain of signaling events between the tissues. During the last decade, the expression patterns of numerous molecules have been studied in developing organs by in situ hybridization and immunohistology. Many of them have been associated with epithelial-mesenchymal interactions, and it is apparent that same molecules participate in regulation of morphogenesis in a number of different organs. Transcription factors such as Msx-1, Msx-2 and Egr-1, growth factors, including TGF beta's, BMPs, and FGFs, and structural proteins such as syndecan and tenascin are expressed in transient, time and space-specific patterns in many organ rudiments, including the tooth. We have shown by tissue recombination studies that the expression of certain molecules is indeed regulated by epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in the early tooth germ. In particular, during the early stages of morphogenesis, when the dental epithelium induces the condensation of mesenchymal cells around the epithelial bud, the expression of many genes is upregulated in the condensed mesenchyme. Previous experimental tissue recombination studies have indicated that at the same time the capacity to instruct tooth morphogenesis shifts from the dental epithelium to the dental mesenchyme.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Rodents have a toothless diastema region between the incisor and molar teeth which may contain rudimentary tooth germs. We found in upper diastema region of the mouse (Mus musculus) three small tooth germs which developed into early bud stage before their apoptotic removal, while the sibling vole (Microtus rossiaemeridionalis) had only a single but larger tooth germ in this region, and this developed into late bud stage before regressing apoptotically. To analyze the genetic mechanisms of the developmental arrest of the rudimentary tooth germs we compared the expression patterns of several developmental regulatory genes (Bmp2, Bmp4, Fgf4, Fgf8, Lef1, Msx1, Msx2, p21, Pitx2, Pax9 and Shh) between molars and diastema buds of mice and voles. In diastema tooth buds the expression of all the genes differed from that of molars. The gene expression patterns suggest that the odontogenic program consists of partially independent signaling cascades which define the exact location of the tooth germ, initiate epithelial budding, and transfer the odontogenic potential from the epithelium to the underlying mesenchyma. Although the diastema regions of the two species differed, in both species the earliest difference that we found was weaker expression of mesenchymal Pax9 in the diastema region than in molar and incisor regions at the dental lamina stage. However, based on earlier tissue recombination experiments it is conceivable that the developmental arrest is determined by the early oral epithelium.

While the evolutionary history of mammalian tooth shapes is well documented in the fossil record, the developmental basis of their tooth shape evolution is unknown. We investigated the expression patterns of eight developmental regulatory genes in two species of rodents with different molar morphologies (mouse, Mus musculus and sibling vole, Microtus rossiaemeridionalis). The genes Bmp-2, Bmp-4, Fgf-4 and Shh encode signal molecules, Lef-1, Msx-1 and Msx-2, are transcription factors and p21CIP1/WAF1 participates in the regulation of cell cycle. These genes are all known to be associated with developmental regulation in mouse molars. In this paper we show that the antisense mRNA probes made from mouse cDNA cross-hybridized with vole tissue. The comparisons of gene expression patterns and morphologies suggest that similar molecular cascades are used in the early budding of tooth germs, in the initiation of tooth crown base formation, and in the initiation of each cusp's development. Furthermore, the co-localization of several genes indicate that epithelial signalling centres function at the three stages of morphogenesis. The earliest signalling centre in the early budding epithelium has not been reported before, but the latter signalling centres, the primary and the secondary enamel knots, have been studied in mouse. The appearance of species-specific tooth shapes was manifested by the regulatory molecules expressed in the secondary enamel knots at the areas of future cusp tips, whilst the mesenchymal gene expression patterns had a buccal bias without similar species-specific associations.

We describe the expression of three Runt-related RUNX genes (previously termed AML, Cbfa, or Pebp2alpha) Runx1 and Runx3 during the development of teeth and other craniofacial tissues and compare them to Runx2 expression reported earlier. All three genes were expressed in mesenchymal condensates. Runx1 was expressed in several cartilage primordia earlier than Runx3, and Runx2 was intense in all mesenchymal condensations of bones and teeth. Only Runx1 was expressed in epithelia, and in tooth germs transcripts were detected in outer dental epithelium. Runx1 was also intensely expressed in the midline epithelium of palatal shelves. In early tooth morphogenesis Runx3 was coexpressed with Runx2 in a thin layer of mesenchymal cells underlying dental epithelium. Unlike Runx2, Runx3 was expressed in odontoblasts. However, Runx3 mutant mice did not show obvious tooth phenotype or deviations of Runx1 and Runx2 expression patterns in the tooth.