The study aimed to determine the validity, practicality, and effectiveness of electronic student worksheets (e-worksheets) based on problem based learning (PBL) to improve students' metacognitive abilities on stoichiometric material. The research was used a research and development (RD). The sample of the study was 30 students from SMAN 19 Surabaya. The instruments were validation sheets, student observation sheets, cognitive test sheets, and MAI questionnaires. The metacognition ability was tested using MAI questionnaire on the aspects of planning, monitoring, and evaluating. Then, it was strengthened again with a cognitive test consisting of 6 cognitive questions. The results showed that the developed e-worksheet has 89.76%; 86.67%; 83.33%; and 86.67% of content; graphics; presentation; and language validities, respectively. All components were in the very high category. The results of the practicality of the e-worksheet were 94.64%; 99.29%; 95.24%; 97.62%; and 94.05% for the PBL strategy; metacognitive; graphics; presentation; and language components, respectively. All components were in the very practical category. Based on the t-test, the sig.2-tailed of the planning, monitoring, and evaluating aspects were less than 0.05 so Ha is accepted, which means that the e-worksheet can improve students' metacognitive abilities in those aspects. This is supported by the t-test of students' cognitive abilities where the sig.2-tailed is 0.000 so Ha is accepted, which means that the developed e-worksheet can improve students' cognitive abilities
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis keterampilan metakognitif peserta didik Program Studi IPA, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode survei. Populasi penelitian merupakan seluruh peserta didik aktif Angkatan 2021− 2018 Program Studi Pendidikan IPA yang berjumlah 463 peserta didik. Digunakan stratified propotional random sampling sebagai teknik sampling, jumlah sampel tersebar tiap angkatan dengan total sebanyak 186 peserta didik. MAI (Metacognitive Awarness Inventory) merupakan cara untuk mengukur kesadaran metakognisi, yang meliputi pengetahuan kognisi dan regulasi kognisi. Subindikator pengetahuan kognisi pengetahuan deklaratif, prosedural, dan kondisional, kemudian subindikator perencanaan, strategi manajemen informasi, monitoring pemahaman, strategi prediksi serta evaluasi sebagai subindikator regulasi kognisi. Analisis data menggunakan analisis deskriptif kuantitatif penelitian menunjukan 70,13% peserta didik memiliki kesadaran metakognisi dengan kategori baik. Indikator pengetahuan kognisi peserta didik dalam kategori baik dengan presentase 70,06%, pada subindikator pengetahuan deklaratif kategori baik dengan presentase 70,05%, pengetahuan proseduraal 69,50% termasuk kategori baik, pengetahuan kondisional 70,64% kategori baik. Indikator regulasi kognisi peserta didik menunjukan presentase 70,17% termasuk dalam kategori baik, dengan subindikator perencanaan 70,80%, strategi manajemen informasi 65,03%, monitoring pemahaman 71,29%, strategi prediksi 73,64% serta evaluasi sebesar 70,08% dengan kategori baik pada tiapsub indikator.Kata kunci: keterampilan metakognisi, pengetahuan metakognisi, regulasi metakognisi, Metacognitive, Awarness Inventory The purpose of this study is to analyze the metacognitive skills of students of the Science Study Program, Trunojoyo University, Madura using a survey method. The research population is all active students of the 2021−2018 Science Education Study Program, totaling 463 students. Stratified proportional random sampling as a sampling technique, the number of samples is spread over each batch with a total of 186 students. Schraw and Dennison (1994) developed the MAI (Metacognitive Awareness Inventory) which can be used to measure metacognitive awareness, which includes knowledge of cognition and regulation of cognition. Cognitive knowledge sub-indicators declarative, procedural, and conditional knowledge, then planning, information management strategies, understanding monitoring, prediction strategies, and evaluation as cognition regulation sub-indicators. Data analysis using quantitative descriptive analysis showed that 70.13% of students had a good category. The indicator of cognitive knowledge with good category with a percentage of 70.06%, declarative knowledge good category with percentage 70.05%, procedural knowledge 69.50% is good category, conditional knowledge 70.64% with good category. The indicator of student cognition regulation shows a percentage of 70.17% included with good category, with planning 70.80%, information management strategy 65.03%, monitoring understanding 71.29%, predictive strategy 73.64%, and evaluation 70.08 % with good category in each sub-indicator.Keywords: metacognitive skills, metacognitive knowledge, regulation of metacognition, Metacognitive, Awareness Inventory
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.