Multivariate control charts are well known to be more sensitive to the occurrence of variation in processes with two or more correlated quality variables than univariate charts. The use of separate univariate control charts to monitor multivariate process can be misleading as it ignores the correlation between the quality characteristics. The application of multivariate control charts allows for the simultaneous monitoring of the quality characteristics by forming a single chart. The charts operate on the assumption that process observations are normally distributed, but in practice this is not always the case. In this study, we examine and present multivariate dispersion control charts for detecting shifts in the covariance matrix of normal and non‐normal bivariate processes. These control charts, referred to as SMAX, QMAX, MDMAX and MADMAX, rely on dispersion estimates, such as the sample standard deviation (S), interquartile range (Q), average absolute deviation from median (MD) and median absolute deviation (MAD), respectively. We compare the performances of these charts to the existing multivariate generalized variance |S| and RMAX charts for bivariate processes using normal and non‐normal parent distributions. The average run length (ARL) measure is used for the evaluation and comparison of the charts. A real life and simulated datasets are used to demonstrate the application of the charts. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
The traditional control charts produce frequent false alarm signals in the presence of autocorrelation. The implementation of the modified chart scheme is a way of handling the problem of autocorrelation in control charts. In modified charts, the standard control limits of the traditional charts are adjusted to offset the influence because of the autocorrelation. The exponentially weighted moving average– and cumulative sum–modified charts are 2 widely used charts for monitoring autocorrelated data. These charts have design parameters in their formulation, and the choice of these parameters play significant roles in the detection of out‐of‐control situations. In reality, the magnitude of the mean shift is uncertain, and this leads to a difficulty in the choice of design parameters by the practitioner. The use of optimal parameters can enhance process performance in such situations. In this paper, we determine optimal design parameters for the charts using an exhaustive search procedure. In the optimization process, we determine the parameters that produce the smallest extra quadratic loss (EQL) value for each autocorrelation coefficient. This criterion measures the anticipated loss attributed to poor quality in the process. The loss in quality is lowered by minimizing the EQL and the combination of parameters in the chart that yields the smallest EQL has a better detection ability over the entire shift range. For the purpose of this work, we concentrate on autocorrelation that can be specifically modelled with autoregressive models. This article provides the practitioner with optimal parameters that can be used to enhance the overall effectiveness of the charts over an entire shift range.
To ensure high quality standards of a process, the application of control charts to monitor process performance has become a regular routine. Multivariate charts are a preferred choice in the presence of more than one process variable.In this article, we proposed a set of bivariate exponentially weighted moving average (EWMA) charts for monitoring the process dispersion. These charts are formulated based on a variety of dispersion statistics considering normal and non-normal bivariate parent distributions. The performance of the different bivariate EWMA dispersion charts is evaluated and compared using the average run length and extra quadratic loss criteria. For the bivariate normal process, the comparisons revealed that the EWMA chart based on the maximum standard deviation (SMAX E ) was the most efficient chart when the shift occurred in one quality variable. It also performed well when the sample size is small and the shift occurred in both quality variables. The EWMA chart based on the maximum average absolute deviation from median (MDMAX E ) performed better than the other charts in most situations when the shift occurred in the covariance matrix for the bivariate non-normal processes. An illustrative example is also presented to show the working of the charts.
Abstract. Control charts act as the most important tool for monitoring of process parameters. The assumption of independence that underpins the implementation of the charts is violated when process observations are correlated. The e ect of this issue can lead to the malfunctioning of the usual control charts by causing a large number of false alarms or slowing the detection ability of the chart in unstable situations. In this paper, we investigated the performance of the Mixed EWMA-CUSUM and Mixed CUSUM-EWMA charts for the e cient monitoring of autocorrelated data. The charts are applied to the residuals obtained from tting an autoregressive (AR) model to the autocorrelated observations. The performance of these charts is compared with the performances of the residual Shewhart, EWMA, CUSUM, combined Shewhart-CUSUM, and combined Shewhart-EWMA charts. Performance criteria such as Average Run Length (ARL) and Extra Quadratic Loss (EQL) are used for the evaluation and comparison of the charts. Illustrative examples are presented to demonstrate the application of the charts to serially correlated observations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.