BackgroundConventional systematic review techniques have limitations when the aim of a review is to construct a critical analysis of a complex body of literature. This article offers a reflexive account of an attempt to conduct an interpretive review of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups in the UKMethodsThis project involved the development and use of the method of Critical Interpretive Synthesis (CIS). This approach is sensitised to the processes of conventional systematic review methodology and draws on recent advances in methods for interpretive synthesis.ResultsMany analyses of equity of access have rested on measures of utilisation of health services, but these are problematic both methodologically and conceptually. A more useful means of understanding access is offered by the synthetic construct of candidacy. Candidacy describes how people's eligibility for healthcare is determined between themselves and health services. It is a continually negotiated property of individuals, subject to multiple influences arising both from people and their social contexts and from macro-level influences on allocation of resources and configuration of services. Health services are continually constituting and seeking to define the appropriate objects of medical attention and intervention, while at the same time people are engaged in constituting and defining what they understand to be the appropriate objects of medical attention and intervention. Access represents a dynamic interplay between these simultaneous, iterative and mutually reinforcing processes. By attending to how vulnerabilities arise in relation to candidacy, the phenomenon of access can be better understood, and more appropriate recommendations made for policy, practice and future research.DiscussionBy innovating with existing methods for interpretive synthesis, it was possible to produce not only new methods for conducting what we have termed critical interpretive synthesis, but also a new theoretical conceptualisation of access to healthcare. This theoretical account of access is distinct from models already extant in the literature, and is the result of combining diverse constructs and evidence into a coherent whole. Both the method and the model should be evaluated in other contexts.

This paper critically reviews existing research on young carers. I argue that our know ledge of what young carers do and how they differ from other children, is extrem ely limited. W ithout this inform ation, practice recommendations will be based on guesswork and prejudice. I argu e that the existing literature pays lip service to the support, or lack of it, that disabled people need to empow er them as parents. In this context, I also review research into the relationship between disability and parenting. Research has tended to involve the search for the negative impact of an adult' s disability on a child' s growth, intelligence and adjustment. This has therefore told us little about how parental disability affects the dom estic and caring tasks of children. There is a conceptual hole in the middle of our existing awareness about caring and childhood, with which future research must attempt to grapple.

No abstract

Dilemmas in the provision of own-home respite support for parents of young children with complex health care needs: evidence from an evaluation Aims. The aim of this article is to present some of the results of a qualitative evaluation of a United Kingdom (UK) nurse-led, home-based, respite service for the families of children under the age of five with complex health care needs. Background. Advances in neonatal medical and nursing care have contributed to a growth in the number of children who survive low birth weight, birth trauma, and various congenital anomalies. Many of these children are likely to have long-term care needs which will require innovative nursing responses. Of particular importance is the need for parental respite, given the added demands of caring for very ill children at home. Methods. A parent-centred, follow-up evaluation, using in-depth qualitative interviews with parents in 18 families consecutively referred to the Children's Outreach Service between April and December 1997. Findings. This evaluation reveals the sometimes mixed reactions of parents to this innovative service, and the equivocal evidence about its role in contributing to family well-being. We discuss, from the perspective of parents using the service, some of the dilemmas and problems in the provision of home-based respite support to this client group. In particular, we explore the diverse ways in which families talk about their need for respite support and point to the need for flexibility in this kind of service provision if these support needs are to be met. Conclusion. We conclude by discussing the practice implications of our evaluation for those planning similar services.

Informal support is a vital part of diabetes care, for adolescents in particular. However, we have a poor appreciation of how adolescents characterize informal support relationships, and how they change over time. This article is based on qualitative, in-depth interviews and focus groups with 21 adolescents (14-19 years old) in Leicestershire. We studied the content and substance of relationships between adolescents with diabetes and their families and friends, how they change and develop over time, and how they interact with formal support from health professionals. We identify a key problem--progressive independence from family life and progressive withdrawal of formal health service input leaves some older adolescents feeling isolated, with possible implications for likely maintenance of contact with routine services.

Despite recent expansion, research evidence from randomized trials for paediatric home care is slight, and methods used are weak in places. Paediatric home care poses practical and ethical questions that cannot be addressed by RCTs.

The results of evaluations of two specially designed federal detention centers are presented. While the designs of the two institutions had different strengths and weaknesses, inmate responses to the environments were similar in several critical areas. Both facilities appeared to provide atmospheres perceived as less stressful, less threatening, and more comfortable than most jails. There was little evidence of violent or destructive behavior. Both facilities had problems related to space restriction and boredom. Important design issues included the ability of planners to accurately predict eventual use of space, and the design of spaces which allow user control of environmental conditions.

No abstract