No abstract

Karyotype-phenotype correlations of common trisomy mosaicism prenatally diagnosed via amniocentesis was reviewed in 305 new cases from a collaboration of North American cytogenetic laboratories. Abnormal outcome was noted in 10/25 (40%) cases of 47,+13/46, 17/31 (54%) cases of 47,+18/46, 10/152 (6.5%) cases of 47,+20/46, and in 49/97 (50%) cases of 47,+21/46 mosaicism. Risk of abnormal outcome in pregnancies with less than 50% trisomic cells and greater than 50% trisomic cells were: 26% (4/15) versus 60% (6/10) for 47,+13/46, 52% (11/21) versus 75% (6/8) for 47,+18/46, 4.5% (6/132) versus 20% (4/20) 47,+20/46, and 45% (27/60) versus 59% (22/37) for 47,+21/46. Phenotypically normal liveborns were observed with mean trisomic cell lines of 9.3% for 47,+13/46, 8.6% for 47,+18/46, 27% for 47, +20/46, and 17% for 47,+21/46. Cytogenetic confirmation rates were 46% (6/13 cases) for 47,+13/46 mosaicism, 66% (8/12 cases) for 47, +18/46, 10% (10/97 cases) for 47,+20/46, and 44% (24/54 cases) for 47,+21/46. There were higher confirmation rates in pregnancies with abnormal versus normal outcome: 50% versus 44% for 47,+13/46 mosaicism, 100% versus 33% for 47,+18/46, 66% versus 7% for 47, +20/46, and 55% versus 40% for 47,+21/46. Repeat amniocentesis is not helpful in predicting clinical outcome. It may be considered when there is insufficient number of cells or cultures to establish a diagnosis. Fetal blood sampling may have a role in mosaic trisomy 13, 18, and 21 as the risk for abnormal outcome increases with positive confirmation: 1/5 (20%) normal cases versus 5/8 (62%) abnormal cases. High resolution ultrasound examination(s) is recommended for clinical correlation and to facilitate genetic counselling.

Trisomy 16 is common in embryos and fetuses aborted early during development. Mosaicism for trisomy 16 is sometimes encountered during prenatal diagnosis, particularly with chorionic villi biopsy specimens, and, until recently, was thought to be confined to the placenta. However, recently, several liveborn infants with trisomy 16 mosaicism have been described. We report on an additional liveborn infant with trisomy 16 mosaicism and compare the clinical findings with those of the previously reported cases in an attempt to delineate a mosaic trisomy 16 syndrome. Cytogenetic analysis from our patient showed that there was a different proportion of abnormal cells in different tissues and that the anomaly was undetectable in blood lymphocyte cultures. This observation was consistent with some of the previous reports. DNA analysis of parents and child was carried out using a polymorphic dinucleotide marker that maps to the long arm of chromosome 16. This analysis showed that the extra chromosome 16 in the infant was maternal in origin and suggested that the nondisjunction was probably a first meiotic division error. Our results suggest that an investigation of multiple tissues is required before concluding that mosaicism is confined to the placenta. We conclude that a finding of trisomy 16 mosaicism at prenatal diagnosis should be regarded with extreme caution. This diagnosis may be associated with a highly variable phenotype that may occasionally be compatible with extrauterine life.

We report on an 22-month-old white girl with tetraploidy who is growing well, but who is extremely delayed in psychomotor development. When counseling parents it is important to realize that, although quite rare, tetraploid individuals can be born alive and live for at least 22 months. The implications are also relevant to prenatal diagnosis.

An 18 month-old boy with partial duplication of the long arm of chromosome 2, based on a paternal balanced translocation, 46,XY,ins (12,2)( q23;q33q37), is described and compared with five previously reported cases. These children have in common a short nose with broad flat bridge and small anteverted nostrils, long upper lip, low-set ears, and minor digital anomalies.

Duplication of the distal part of 17q has been reported in 4 patients [1,2]. We are reporting clinical, autopsy, and cytogenetic data on an additional patient whose condition was due to a familial translocation in which the patient's chromosome constitution is 46,XX, der(4),t(4;17)(p16;q21) pat. The phenotype of the five known patients with this duplication is very similar, and their manifestations are distinct enough to be clinically recognizable. Abnormalities common to all five patients are severe growth impairment, craniofacial anomalies with severe hypertelorism, frontal bossing and temporal narrowness, a widow's peak, narrow palpebral fissures, a thin upper lip overlapping a thin lower lip with down-turned corners of the mouth, micrognathia, apparently low-set and deformed ears, short webbed neck, and hyperlaxity of the limbs.

No abstract

No abstract