This paper presents an assessment of the extent and conditions under which private financing can be a realistic approach for sanitation in slums. It is based on a cross-sectional study comparing two slum communities in East Africa, where 250 households from Bwaise III in Kampala, Uganda and 379 households from Temeke in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania were interviewed in 2010. Also, 10 key-informant interviews and 8 focus group discussions were conducted in addition to field observations. Findings show that majority (85%) of households used unimproved, private-shared pit latrines. These privately owned latrines had many structural shortfalls besides poor operation and maintenance while the public latrines provided by third-party were structurally sound but were under-utilized in residential slum neighorhoods. This is attributed to the presence free or at least cheaper alternatives which the community members preferred instead of paying per-visit user-fees. For the few who were willing to pay, willingness to pay was positively associated with the presence of a facility User committee and having been sensitized. In this context, a combination of these factors made cost recovery as well as operation and maintenance very minimal. The poor status of privately owned shared pit latrines matched the limited income levels of households. Similarly, cost recovery for public facilities was dependent on the number of users who were willing to pay: the more the users, the more the cost recovery. A combination of private and public financing is thus necessary to fund different but complementary aspects of sanitation in slums.
Pollutant loading in Lake Victoria is resulting from a wide range of anthropogenic activities. This study focused on Non-Point Sources (NPS) of pollution and it was carried out to identify and characterize land-use activities and to quantify the sediment and nutrient loads (nitrogen and phosphorus). The study was conducted in Simiyu catchment of Lake Victoria using land-use data of 1975 and 2006 and comparing the relative impact of land-use change on sediment and nutrient load (P and N) into the lake. Possible best management practices were also identified for those sub-basins with the highest pollution yield. Remote sensing using the package ILIWIS 3.0 was used to identify and characterize the land-use and the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was used to quantify sediment and nutrient load from these two different land-use scenarios. Land use classification according to the SWAT model shows that Agricultural Land-Generic (AGRL) contributes about 73.43%, Range-brush (RNGB) contributes 24.42%, Pasture (PAST), 2.10% Savanna (SAVA) 0.03% and Water (WATR) 0.02% of the total catchment area of Simiyu. It was also found out that there was an expansion of agricultural land from covering 19.33% of the catchment to 73.43% at an annual change rate of 2.9%. However, average Nitrate load was higher for 1975 than 2006. The P load of 1975 was less compared to that in 2006. Model simulation at the catchment outlet for N gave 77.2 kg/km 2 .yr while observed values were 146 kg/km 2 .yr, simulated P was 47 kg/km 2 .yr while observed was 164 kg/km 2 .yr. Hence, the model underestimated nutrient yield in the catchment. Therefore, the applicability of the SWAT modelling tool in studying NPS pollution yields poor model performance due to the scantiness of data used for model calibration. More rigorous data campaigns have to be carried out along the two rivers of Duma and Simiyu for purposes of gaining enough information for model calibration and validation. With good model performance, developing management plans to control NPS pollution around Lake Victoria could be achieved using the SWAT model.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.