Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) offers the opportunity for early medical and nutritional intervention that can lead to improved outcomes. Management of the asymptomatic infant diagnosed with CF through newborn screening, prenatal diagnosis, or sibling screening is different from treatment of the symptomatically diagnosed individual. The focus of management is on maintaining health by preventing nutritional and respiratory complications. The CF Foundation convened a committee to develop recommendations based on a systematic review of the evidence and expert opinion. These guidelines encompass monitoring and treatment recommendations for infants diagnosed with CF and are intended to help guide families, primary care providers, and specialty care centers in the care of infants with CF.
Medical, neurodevelopmental, and parenting effects of individualized developmental care were investigated in a three-center, randomized, controlled trial. A total of 92 preterm infants, weighing less than 1250 g and aged less than 28 weeks, participated. Outcome measures included medical, neurodevelopmental and family function. Quality of care was also assessed. Multivariate analysis of variance investigated group, site, and interaction effects; correlation analysis identified individual variable contributions to significant effects. The results consistently favored the experimental groups. The following contributed to the group effects: shorter duration of parenteral feeding, transition to full oral feeding, intensive care, and hospitalization; lower incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis; reduced discharge ages and hospital charges; improved weight, length, and head circumferences; enhanced autonomic, motor, state, attention, and self-regulatory functioning; reduced need for facilitation; and lowered family stress and enhanced appreciation of the infant. Quality of care was measurably improved. Very low birth weight infants and their parents, across diverse settings, may benefit from individualized developmental care.
In multivariate analyses, a number of specific measures of respiratory care practice during the first postnatal week were associated with the risk of a very low birth weight infant developing CLD. However, after adjusting for baseline risk, most of the increased risk of CLD among very low birth weight infants hospitalized at 2 Boston NICUs, compared with those at Babies' Hospital, was explained simply by the initiation of mechanical ventilation.
Traditionally, DNA used for PCR-based diagnostic analysis has originated from white cells fractionated from whole blood. Although this method yields substantial quantities of DNA, there are some drawbacks to the procedure, including the inconvenience of drawing blood, risk of exposure to blood-borne pathogens, liquid sample handling, and the somewhat involved extraction procedure. Alternatively, DNA for genetic diagnosis has been derived from finger stick blood samples, hair roots, cheek scrapings, and urine samples. Oral saline rinses have also been used extensively as a means of collecting buccal epithelial cells as a DNA source. However, this method still requires liquid sample handling. Herein, we present our results involving the rapid extraction of DNA from buccal cells collected on cytology brushes and swabs for use in PCR reactions, specifically the multiplex amplification of 5 exons within the CFTR gene. The quality of DNA isolated from buccal cells, collected in this manner, has been sufficient to reproducibly support multiplex amplification. Cheek cell samples and the DNA prepared from them as described here are highly stable. The success rate of PCR amplification on DNA prepared from buccal cells is 99%. In a blind study comparing the analysis of 12 mutations responsible for cystic fibrosis in multiplex products amplified with DNA from both blood and buccal cell samples from 464 individuals, there was 100% correlation of results for blood and cheek cell DNA, validating the use of DNA extracted from cheek cells collected on cytology brushes for use in genetic testing.
Through early detection, newborn screening (NBS)(1) for cystic fibrosis (CF) offers the opportunity for early intervention and improved outcomes. NBS programs screen for hypertrypsinogenemia, and most also identify mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. Individuals identified by NBS are diagnosed with CF if they have an elevated sweat chloride level or if they have inherited 2 disease-causing mutations in the CFTR gene. Mutations in the CFTR gene can cause CF, but not all CFTR mutations are disease-causing. The term CFTR-related metabolic syndrome (CRMS) is proposed to describe infants identified by hypertrypsinogenemia on NBS who have sweat chloride values<60 mmol/L and up to 2 CFTR mutations, at least 1 of which is not clearly categorized as a "CF-causing mutation," thus they do not meet CF Foundation guidelines for the diagnosis of CF. With what is now near-universal CF NBS in the United States, an increasing number of infants with CRMS are being identified. Given our inadequate knowledge of the natural history of CRMS, standards for diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment are absent. This document aims to help guide the monitoring and care of individuals with CRMS while our knowledge base on appropriate management evolves.
The rapid development of genomic sequencing technologies has decreased the cost of genetic analysis to the extent that it seems plausible that genome-scale sequencing could have widespread availability in pediatric care. Genomic sequencing provides a powerful diagnostic modality for patients who manifest symptoms of monogenic disease and an opportunity to detect health conditions before their development. However, many technical, clinical, ethical, and societal challenges should be addressed before such technology is widely deployed in pediatric practice. This article provides an overview of the Newborn Sequencing in Genomic Medicine and Public Health Consortium, which is investigating the application of genome-scale sequencing in newborns for both diagnosis and screening.
Project TeamGenomic sequencing provides many opportunities in newborn clinical care, but the challenges of interpreting and reporting newborn genomic sequencing (nGS) results need to be addressed for its broader and effective application. The BabySeq Project is a pilot randomized clinical trial that explores the medical, behavioral, and economic impacts of nGS in well newborns and those admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Here we present childhood-onset and actionable adult-onset disease risk, carrier status, and pharmacogenomics findings from nGS of 159 newborns in the BabySeq Project. nGS revealed a risk of childhood-onset disease in 15/159 (9.4%) newborns; none of the disease risks were anticipated based on the infants' known clinical or family histories. nGS also revealed actionable adult-onset disease risk in 3/85 (3.5%) newborns whose parents consented to receive this information. Carrier status for recessive diseases and pharmacogenomics variants were reported in 88% and 5% of newborns, respectively. Additional indication-based analyses were performed in 29/32 (91%) NICU newborns and 6/127 (5%) healthy newborns who later had presentations that prompted a diagnostic analysis. No variants that sufficiently explained the reason for the indications were identified; however, suspicious but uncertain results were reported in five newborns. Testing parental samples contributed to the interpretation and reporting of results in 13/159 (8%) newborns. Our results suggest that nGS can effectively detect risk and carrier status for a wide range of disorders that are not detectable by current newborn screening assays or predicted based on the infant's known clinical or family history, and the interpretation of results can substantially benefit from parental testing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.