Molecular mechanism of Ena/VASP-mediated actin-filament elongationEna/VASP proteins have important functions in actin-dependent processes. A model for the actin elongation activity of Ena/VASP based on the affinity and saturation state of WH2-domain-mediated actin monomer binding is presented.

How cells maintain nuclear shape and position against various intracellular and extracellular forces is not well understood, although defects in nuclear mechanical homeostasis are associated with a variety of human diseases. We estimated the force required to displace and deform the nucleus in adherent living cells with a technique to locally pull the nuclear surface. A minimum pulling force of a few nanonewtons-far greater than typical intracellular motor forces-was required to significantly displace and deform the nucleus. Upon force removal, the original shape and position were restored quickly within a few seconds. This stiff, elastic response required the presence of vimentin, lamin A/C, and SUN (Sad1p, UNC-84)-domain protein linkages, but not F-actin or microtubules. Although F-actin and microtubules are known to exert mechanical forces on the nuclear surface through molecular motor activity, we conclude that the intermediate filament networks maintain nuclear mechanical homeostasis against localized forces.nuclear forces | cytoskeleton | nuclear positioning | nuclear mechanics | nuclear shape T he nucleus in a cultured cell such as a fibroblast is close to the center of the cell and typically has a smooth, regular shape. It is known that the migrating cell moves the nucleus by transferring cytoskeletal forces through connections between the cytoskeleton and the nuclear surface (1, 2). Even in a stationary cell, the nuclear shape and central position are stably maintained in mechanical homeostasis at defined locations in the cell, despite the fact that the dynamic cytoskeleton continues to generate constantly fluctuating forces on the nucleus (3, 4).The source of fluctuating forces on the nucleus includes nuclear-embedded microtubule motors such as dynein and kinesin (5-7) and actomyosin forces that push on and pull the nucleus (2,8,9). The nucleus is also exposed to extracellular forces, such as those applied to adhesion receptors, which can be transmitted through the cytoskeleton onto the nuclear surface (10-12). How nuclear shape and position are maintained in mechanical homeostasis despite the different types of forces that act on the nucleus is an open question. This is particularly important because deregulated positioning and irregular nuclear shapes are associated with a variety of human pathologies (reviewed in ref. 13).Here we describe a method to apply forces directly to nuclei in cultured, living, adherent cells. With this method, we estimate a minimum pulling force of a few nanonewtons-far greater than typical intracellular motor forces-is required to significantly displace and deform the nucleus. Although F-actin and microtubules are known to exert mechanical forces on the nuclear surface through molecular motor activity, we show that the intermediate filament networks maintain nuclear mechanical homeostasis. ResultsTo determine the forces that are required for moving and deforming the nucleus, and to identify the cellular components that oppose motion and deformation, we devised a method to ...

The nucleus has a smooth, regular appearance in normal cells, and its shape is greatly altered in human pathologies. Yet, how the cell establishes nuclear shape is not well understood. We imaged the dynamics of nuclear shaping in NIH3T3 fibroblasts. Nuclei translated toward the substratum and began flattening during the early stages of cell spreading. Initially, nuclear height and width correlated with the degree of cell spreading, but over time, reached steady-state values even as the cell continued to spread. Actomyosin activity, actomyosin bundles, microtubules, and intermediate filaments, as well as the LINC complex, were all dispensable for nuclear flattening as long as the cell could spread. Inhibition of actin polymerization as well as myosin light chain kinase with the drug ML7 limited both the initial spreading of cells and flattening of nuclei, and for well-spread cells, inhibition of myosin-II ATPase with the drug blebbistatin decreased cell spreading with associated nuclear rounding. Together, these results show that cell spreading is necessary and sufficient to drive nuclear flattening under a wide range of conditions, including in the presence or absence of myosin activity. To explain this observation, we propose a computational model for nuclear and cell mechanics that shows how frictional transmission of stress from the moving cell boundaries to the nuclear surface shapes the nucleus during early cell spreading. Our results point to a surprisingly simple mechanical system in cells for establishing nuclear shapes.

We present here the first quantitative correlation for cell contact guidance in an oriented fibrillar network in terms of biased cell migration. The correlation is between the anisotropic cell diffusion parameter, DA = Dx/Dy, and the collagen gel birefringence, delta n, a measure of axially biased collagen fibril orientation in the x-direction. The cell diffusion coefficients, Dx and Dy, measure the dispersal of cells in the directions coincident with and normal to the axis of fibril orientation, respectively. Three essential methodological components are involved: (i) exploiting the orienting effect of a magnetic field on collagen fibrils during fibrillogenesis to systematically prepare uniform axially oriented collagen gels; (ii) using a microscope/image analysis workstation with precise, computer-controlled rotating and translating stages to automate birefringence measurement and, along with rapid "coarse optical sectioning" via digital image processing, to enable 3-D cell tracking of many cells in multiple samples simultaneously; and (iii) employing a rigorous statistical analysis of the cell tracks to estimate the magnitude and precision of the direction-dependent cell diffusion coefficients, Dx and Dy, that define DA. We find that this measure of biased migration in contact guidance (DA) increases with increasing collagen fibril orientation (delta n) due mainly to a rapid enhancement of migration along the axis of fibril orientation at low levels of fibril orientation, and to a continued suppression of migration normal to the axis of fibril orientation at high levels of fibril orientation.

Force generation in several types of cell motility is driven by rapidly elongating cytoskeletal filaments that are persistently tethered at their polymerizing ends to propelled objects. These properties are not easily explained by force-generation models that require free (i.e., untethered) filament ends to fluctuate away from the surface for addition of new monomers. In contrast, filament end-tracking proteins that processively advance on filament ends can facilitate rapid elongation and substantial force generation by persistently tethered filaments. Such processive end-tracking proteins, termed here filament end-tracking motors, maintain possession of filament ends and, like other biomolecular motors, advance by means of 5'-nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) hydrolysis-driven affinity-modulated interactions. On-filament NTP hydrolysis/phosphate release yields substantially more energy than that required for driving steady-state assembly/disassembly of free filament ends (i.e., filament treadmilling), as revealed by an energy inventory on the treadmilling cycle. The kinetic and thermodynamic properties of two simple end-tracking mechanisms (an end-tracking stepping motor and a direct-transfer end-tracking motor) are analyzed to illustrate the advantages of an end-tracking motor over free filament-end elongation, and over passive end-trackers that operate without the benefit of NTP hydrolysis, in terms of generating force, facilitating rapid monomer addition, and maintaining tight possession of the filament ends. We describe an additional cofactor-assisted end-tracking motor to account for suggested roles of cofactors in the affinity-modulated interactions, such as profilin in actin-filament end-tracking motors and EB1 in microtubule end-tracking motors.

Active cell migration is essential in many physiological processes and in the func

Although actin-based motility drives cell crawling and intracellular locomotion of organelles and certain pathogens, the underlying mechanism of force generation remains a mystery. Recent experiments demonstrated that Listeria exhibit episodes of 5.4-nm stepwise motion corresponding to the periodicity of the actin filament subunits, and extremely small positional fluctuations during the intermittent pauses [S. C. Kuo and J. L. McGrath. 2000. Nature. 407:1026-1029]. These findings suggest that motile bacteria remain firmly bound to actin filament ends as they elongate, a behavior that appears to rule out previous models for actin-based motility. We propose and analyze a new mechanochemical model (called the "Lock, Load & Fire" mechanism) for force generation by means of affinity-modulated, clamped-filament elongation. During the locking step, the filament's terminal ATP-containing subunit binds tightly to a clamp situated on the surface of a motile object; in the loading step, actin.ATP monomer(s) bind to the filament end, an event that triggers the firing step, wherein ATP hydrolysis on the clamped subunit attenuates the filament's affinity for the clamp. This last step initiates translocation of the new ATP-containing terminus to the clamp, whereupon another cycle begins anew. This model explains how surface-tethered filaments can grow while exerting flexural or tensile force on the motile surface. Moreover, stochastic simulations of the model reproduce the signature motions of Listeria. This elongation motor, which we term actoclampin, exploits actin's intrinsic ATPase activity to provide a simple, high-fidelity enzymatic reaction cycle for force production that does not require elongating filaments to dissociate from the motile surface. This mechanism may operate whenever actin polymerization is called upon to generate the forces that drive cell crawling or intracellular organelle motility.

Positioning and shaping the nucleus represents a mechanical challenge for the migrating cell because of its large size and resistance to deformation. Cells shape and position the nucleus by transmitting forces from the cytoskeleton onto the nuclear surface. This force transfer can occur through specialized linkages between the nuclear envelope and the cytoskeleton. In response, the nucleus can deform and/or it can move. Nuclear movement will occur when there is a net differential in mechanical force across the nucleus, while nuclear deformation will occur when mechanical forces overcome the mechanical resistance of the various structures that comprise the nucleus. In this perspective, we review current literature on the sources and magnitude of cellular forces exerted on the nucleus, the nuclear envelope proteins involved in transferring cellular forces, and the contribution of different nuclear structural components to the mechanical response of the nucleus to these forces.