Two-hundred and nine normal subjects underwent a study aimed at providing norms for some attention tests currently used in neuropsychological examination. Norms were calculated taking into account the demographic variables. Our battery included single visuo-manual and go/no-go reaction times, and two versions of the Stroop Colour-Word Test. For the latter test, we employed a traditional version based on card presentation and a new version based on computer-assisted presentation. We evaluated the intercorrelation of the different tests, and studied the statistical regression models in order to adjust the original scores according to age, education and gender. Normative values were calculated following the Equivalent Scores method. The pattern of intercorrelation of our battery and the regression models of the scores are discussed with reference to the literature. The newly developed computer-assisted presentation of the Stroop test offers some advantages over the traditional version, especially with patients affected by spatial disorders.
We report two head-injured patients whose knowledge of living things was selectively disrupted. Their semantic knowledge was tested with naming and verbal comprehension tasks and a verbal questionnaire. In all of them there was consistent evidence that knowledge of living things was impaired and that of non-living things was relatively preserved. The living things deficit emerged irrespective of whether the question tapped associative or perceptual knowledge or required visual or non visual information. In all tasks the category effect was still significant after the influence on the performance of the following variables was partialled out: word frequency, concept familiarity, prototypicality, name agreement, image agreement and visual complexity. In the verbal questionnaire dissociations were still significant even after adjustment for the difficulty of questions for normals, that had proven greater for living things. Besides diffuse brain damage, both patients presented with a left posterior temporo-parietal lesion.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.