OBJECTIVES:Although several studies have investigated the effects of diabetes on hearing loss, the relationship between these two conditions remains unclear. Some studies have suggested that diabetes may cause sensorineural hearing loss, whereas others have failed to find an association. The biggest challenge in investigating the association between diabetes and hearing loss is the presence of confounding variables and the complexity of the auditory system. Our study investigated the association between diabetes and sensorineural hearing loss. We evaluated the influence of time from diabetes diagnosis on this association after controlling for age, gender, and hypertension diagnosis and excluding those subjects with exposure to noise.METHODS:This cross-sectional study evaluated 901 adult and elderly Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) participants from São Paulo, Brazil who underwent audiometry testing as part of ELSA-Brasil’s baseline assessment.RESULTS:Hearing thresholds and speech test results were significantly worse in the group with diabetes than in the group without diabetes. However, no significant differences were found between participants with and without diabetes after adjusting for age, gender, and the presence of hypertension. Hearing thresholds were not affected by occupational noise exposure in the groups with and without diabetes. In addition, no association between the duration of diabetes and hearing thresholds was observed after adjusting for age, gender, and hypertension.CONCLUSION:We found no association between the duration of diabetes and worse hearing thresholds after models were adjusted for age, gender, and the presence of hypertension.

It was observed that the systemic arterial hypertension group showed the greatest decrease in auditory thresholds in the studied segment when compared to the other groups, suggesting that among the three studied conditions, hypertension seems to have the greatest influence on hearing.

It was found that older adults with DM and hypertension associated showed greater hearing impairment in comparison with the other groups, suggesting a synergistic effect of the two chronic diseases on hearing.

Background: although clinical use of the click stimulus for the evaluation of brainstem auditory function is widespread, and despite the fact that several researchers use such stimulus in studies involving human hearing, little is known about the auditory processing of complex stimuli such as speech. Aim: to characterize the findings of the Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) performed with speech stimuli in adults with typical development. Method: fifty subjects, 22 males and 28 females, with typical development, were assessed for ABR using both click and speech stimuli. Results: the latencies and amplitudes of the response components onset (V, A and complex VA), the area and slope that occur before 10 ms were identified and analyzed. These measurements were identified in all of the studied subjects and presented wave latency values ( ResumoTema: embora o uso clínico do estímulo clique na avaliação da função auditiva no Tronco Encefálico (TE) já esteja bastante difundido, e uma grande variedade de pesquisadores usarem tal estímulo nos estudos da audição humana, pouco se sabe a respeito do processamento auditivo de estímulos complexos como a fala. Objetivo: o presente estudo tem como objetivo caracterizar os achados dos Potenciais Evocados Auditivos de Tronco Encefálico (PEATE) realizados com estímulos de fala, em indivíduos adultos com desenvolvimento típico. Método: 50 indivíduos, sendo 22 do gênero masculino e 28 do feminino, com desenvolvimento típico, foram avaliados quanto aos PEATE, tanto para estímulo clique quanto para estímulo de fala. Resultados: foram identificadas e analisadas as latências e amplitudes das componentes da resposta onset (V, A e complexo VA), a área e slope, que ocorrem antes dos 10ms; essas medidas foram identificadas em todos os indivíduos avaliados, e mostrou valores de latências (ms) para as ondas V, A e Complexo VA: V= 7.18 (DP= 1.08); A = 8.66 (DP=1. 480

Gi ven the high prevalence of presbycusis and the damage it brings about, a screening test can be useful in the identification of hearing loss in primary care. Aim:To estimate the prevalence of hearing loss in a representative sample of elderly people living at Butantan using an audiological screening method (questionnaire) and a basic audiological evaluation; to compare the results of the two kinds of evaluations, checking the validity of this tool for hearing loss screening.Design: Cross sectional descriptive study.Materials and Methods: 200 individuals (above 60 years old, both genders) were randomly selected to undergo audiological screening (questionnaire). Another randomly selected group encompassed 100 individuals who were submitted to a set of audiological tests. Then, we compared the results from the two methods.Results: There were no statistically significant associations between the questionnaire and the degree of hearing loss of the patients. Conclusion:The prevalence of hearing loss in our sample was of 56% in the screening and of 95% when checked by the audiological evaluation. Therefore, screening was not proven valid to assess hearing when compared to audiological evaluation. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;77(1):70-6. BJORL ORIGINAL ARTICLE