From 2006 to 2010, a retrospective study was conducted in a university referral tertiary care hospital to study the frequency and distribution of Candida species in different medical specialties. The use of mechanical ventilation, central venous catheter, and urinary catheter were recorded per 1,000 patient-days and the use of antifungals was calculated using defined daily dose (DDD). A total of 313 episodes were identified and the overall incidence was 0.54 (0.41-0.71) episodes per 1,000 patient-days. Candida albicans caused 44% of the overall episodes, followed by C. tropicalis (21.7%), C. parapsilosis (14.4%), C. glabrata (11.2%), and C. krusei (3.5%). The incidence of C. glabrata significantly increased from 2006-2010 (range: 4.8-23.5%) (P = 0.024). Candida glabrata was associated with malignancies (P = 0.004) and C. krusei with hematologic malignancies (P < 0.0001). The use of antifungals was higher in the hematology/bone marrow transplant units and represented 40% of all fluconazole prescription in the hospital. There was no correlation with the use of fluconazole and the increasing ratio of C. glabrata (r = 0.60). The use of invasive devices was significantly higher in the intensive care units (ICUs) than the medical and surgical emergencies units (P < 0.001). In contrast, the emergencies had higher incidence of candidemia (2-2.1 episodes/1,000 patient-days) than the ICUs (1.6 episodes 1,000 patient-days). Candida glabrata candidemia showed a significant increase in contrast to the current national literature where C. parapsilosis remained the most important non-C. albicans Candida species in Brazilian hospitals. Our findings suggested that the increasing incidence of C. glabrata was not associated with use of fluconazole and other risk factors might play an important role.
Candida parapsilosis complex (CPC) is the third Candida species isolated in blood cultures of patients from our Hospital, following C. albicans and C. tropicalis. From 2006 to 2010, the median annual distribution of CPC was 8 cases/year. Records of 36 patients were reviewed. CPC were 31 (86.1%) C. parapsilosis; 4 (11.1%) C. orthopsilosis; and 1 (2.8%) C. metapsilosis. Clinical characteristics were central venous catheter, 34 (94.4%); parental nutrition, 25 (70%); surgery, 27 (57.9%); prior bacteremia, 20 (51.3%); malignancy, 18 (50%). General mortality was 47.2%. Death was higher in immunosuppressed patients (17 vs. 11; p = 0.003). Three out four (75%) patients with C. orthopsilosis and 14 out 31 (45.2%) with C. parapsilosis died (p = 0.558). Thirty-nine individual isolates were tested for susceptibility to seven antifungal drugs, with MICs values showing susceptibility to all of them. Two isolates, one C. orthopsilosis and one C. parapsilosis, had fluconazole MIC = 4 μg/mL. Differentiation among CPC has implication in caring for patients with invasive candidiasis since there are differences in virulence, pathogenicity and drug susceptibility. A method targeting the topoisomerase II gene based on loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) was developed. LAMP emerges as a promising tool for the identification of fungal species due to the high sensitivity and specificity. LAMP can be performed at the point-of-care, being no necessary the use of expensive equipment. In our study, the method was successful comparing to the DNA sequencing and proved to be a reliable and fast assay to distinguish the three species of CPC.
The purpose of this article was to describe a 2.5-year interventional program designed to control the dissemination after a large hospital outbreak of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in a tertiary-care university hospital. A VRE working group was designated to work specifically on controlling VRE intrahospital dissemination after the detection of the first VRE infection at in our hospital in June 2007. The intervention consisted in the interruption of new admissions during a period of 15 days and closure of the index case unit, microbiological surveillance of rectal swabs for VRE, cohorting patients and staff, immediate application of contact precautions, and continuous education. From July 2007 to December 2009, 8,692 rectal swabs were cultured for VRE and 321 (3.7%) were positive. An expressive reduction of the detection of new positive rectal swabs cultures was seen during the year 2009 (1.5%) when compared to 2008 (4.2%) and 2007 (7.2%) (p < 0.005). The annual ratio of VRE per 1,000 admissions reduced from 20.3 in 2007 to 10.07 and 3.82 in 2008 and 2009, respectively (p < 0.001). The continuous microbiologic surveillance for VRE and strict and prompt contact precautions for VRE patients were the fundamental aids in the control of VRE.
Background COVID-19 co-infections have been described with different pathogens, including filamentous and yeast fungi. Methodology A retrospective case series study conducted from February to December 2020, at a Brazilian university hospital. Data were collected from two hospital surveillance systems: Invasive fungal infection (IFI) surveillance (Mycosis Resistance Program - MIRE) and COVID-19 surveillance. Data from both surveillance systems were cross-checked to identify individuals diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 (by positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR)) and IFI during hospital stays within the study period. Results During the study period, 716 inpatients with COVID-19 and 55 cases of IFI were identified. Fungal co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 was observed in eight (1%) patients: three cases of aspergillosis; four candidemia and one cryptococcosis. The median age of patients was 66 years (IQR 58-71 years; range of 28-77 years) and 62.5% were men. Diagnosis of IFI occurred a median of 11.5 days (IQR 4.5-23 days) after admission and 11 days (IQR 6.5-16 days) after a positive PCR result for SARS-CoV-2. In 75% of cases, IFI was diagnosed in the intensive care unit (ICU). Cases of aspergillosis emerged earlier than those of candidemia: an average of 8.6 and 28.6 days after a positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2, respectively. All the patients with both infections ultimately died. Conclusion a low rate of COVID-19 co-infection with IFI was observed, with high mortality. Most cases were diagnosed in ICU patients. Aspergillosis diagnosis is highly complex in this context and requires different criteria.
Background: Bloodstream infection (BSI) is the most challenging conditions in patients who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). These infections may be related to health care in cases of central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) or to translocation secondary to mucosal barrier injury (MBI). In 2013, MBI surveillance was incorporated into the CDC NHSN. The aim was to increase the CLABSI diagnostic accuracy by proposing more effective preventive care measures. The objective of this study was to evaluate impact of the MBI surveillance on CLABSI incidence density in a Brazilian university hospital. Methods: The CLABSI incidence densities from the period before BMI surveillance (2007–2012) and the period after BMI surveillance was implemented (2013–2018) were analyzed and compared. Infections during the preintervention period were reclassified according to the MBI criterion to obtain an accurate CLABSI rate for the first period. The average incidence densities for the 2 periods were compared using the Student t test after testing for no autocorrelation (P > .05). Results: After reclassification, the preintervention period incidence density (10 infections per 1,000 patient days) was significantly higher than the postintervention period incidence density (6 infections per 1,000 patients day; P = .011) (Table 1). Therefore, the reclassification of nonpreventable infections (MBI) in the surveillance system made the diagnosis of CLABSI more specific. The hospital infection control service was able to introduce specific preventive measures related to the insertion and management of central lines in HSCT patient care. Conclusions: The MBI classification improved the CLABSI diagnosis, which upgraded central-line prevention measures, then contributed to the decrease of CLABSI rates in this high-risk population.Funding: NoneDisclosures: None
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.