No abstract

The emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic has created an unprecedented healthcare, social, and economic disaster. Wearing of masks and social distancing can significantly decrease transmission and spread, however, due to circumstances such as medical or dental intervention and personal choice these practices have not been universally adopted. Additional strategies are required to lessen transmission. Nasal rinses and mouthwashes, which directly impact the major sites of reception and transmission of human coronaviruses (HCoV), may provide an additional level of protection against the virus. Common over‐the‐counter nasal rinses and mouthwashes/gargles were tested for their ability to inactivate high concentrations of HCoV using contact times of 30 s, 1 min, and 2 min. Reductions in titers were measured by using the tissue culture infectious dose 50 (TCID50) assay. A 1% baby shampoo nasal rinse solution inactivated HCoV greater than 99.9% with a 2‐min contact time. Several over‐the‐counter mouthwash/gargle products including Listerine and Listerine‐like products were highly effective at inactivating infectious virus with greater than 99.9% even with a 30‐s contact time. In the current manuscript we have demonstrated that several commonly available healthcare products have significant virucidal properties with respect to HCoV.

No abstract

No abstract

Background. This pilot study assessed the levels of patient emotional distress and impact on clinic throughput time.Methods. From April through August 2012, 149 breast cancer patients at the Penn State Hershey Breast Center were screened with the emotions thermometer (ET), a patient-rated visual 0-10 scale that measures distress, anxiety, depression, anger, burden, and need for help. Also, patients indicated their most pressing cancer-related concerns. Clinic visit time was computed and compared with a control group. Results. Using a previously validated cut point C4 for any thermometer, we found emotional difficulty in the following proportions: distress 22 %, anxiety 28 %, depression 18 %, anger 14 %, burden 16 %, and need for help 10 %; 35 % scored above the cut point on at least 1 thermometer. We found higher levels of distress in all domains associated with younger age at diagnosis. More extensive surgery (bilateral mastectomy vs unilateral mastectomy vs. lumpectomy) was correlated with higher levels of psychosocial distress. Most often cited concerns, experienced by [20 %, included eating/weight, worry about cancer, sleep problems, fatigue, anxiety, and pain. Mean clinic visit time for evaluable patients screened using the ET (n = 109) was 43.9 min (SD 18.6), compared with 42.6 min (SD 16.2) for the control group (n = 50).Conclusions. Utilizing the ET, more than one-third of women screened met criteria for psychological distress. Younger age at diagnosis and more extensive surgery were risk factors. The ET is a simple validated screening tool that identifies patients in need of further psychological evaluation without impacting clinic throughput time.Breast cancer is the most common non-skin cancer among women, with as many as 1 in 8 women diagnosed in their lifetime. 1 It is second only to lung cancer as the leading cause of death due to cancer among women. Nonetheless, diagnostics and therapeutics for breast cancer-similar to many kinds of cancer-have seen continuing improvements, leading to subsequent improvements in prognosis. Although improved prognosis often equals longer life, it does not necessarily equal improved morbidity. Therefore, there has been increasing recognition of the importance of quality of life. 2 The importance of addressing psychological distress in women with breast cancer has clearly been established. [3][4][5] In fact, the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer has mandated that cancer centers implement screening programs for psychosocial distress as a new criterion for accreditation. 6 Yet, barriers to care remain, including underrecognition of the need for psychological care as well as possible inciting factors. Because most conventional scales developed to detect distress and depression are too long for routine use in clinical settings, simple verbal and visual-analog measures have been developed of which the distress thermometer (DT) is perhaps the most well known. [7][8][9][10] Although a significant advance in distress screening, the DT falls short in its ability...

Prior research has used focus group methodology to investigate cultural factors impacting the breast cancer experience of women of various ethnicities including African-Americans; however, this work has not specifically addressed treatment decision-making. This study identifies key issues faced by African-American women diagnosed with breast cancer regarding treatment decisions. We used an interpretive-descriptive study design based on qualitative data from three focus groups (n = 14) representing a population of African-American women in central Pennsylvania. Participants were asked to think back to when they were diagnosed with breast cancer and their visit with the breast surgeon. Questions were asked about the actual visit, treatment choices offered, sources of information, and whether the women felt prepared for the surgery and subsequent treatments. The prompts triggered memories and encouraged open discussion. The most important themes identified were fear across the breast cancer disease trajectory, a preference for visual information for understanding the diagnosis and surgical treatment, and support systems relying on family and friends, rather than the formal health-care system. Our results have implications for practice strategies and development of educational interventions that will help breast cancer patients better understand their diagnosis and treatment options, encourage their participation in treatment decision-making, and provide psychosocial support for those at high risk for emotional distress.

No abstract

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has greatly increased the frequency of disinfecting surfaces in public places causing a strain on the ability to obtain disinfectant solutions. An alternative is to supply plain alcohols (EtOH and IPA) or sodium hypochlorite (SH). Aim There are few data showing the efficacy of multiple concentrations of EtOH, IPA, and SH on a human coronavirus (HCoV) dried on surfaces using short contact times. Methods Multiple concentrations of EtOH, IPA, and SH to inactivate high numbers of HCoV under real-life conditions were tested. High concentrations of infectious HCoV were dried on porcelain and ceramic tiles, then treated with multiple concentrations of the alcohols for contact times of 15 sec, 30 sec, and 1 min. Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommended three concentrations of SH were also tested. Reductions in titres were measured by using the tissue culture infectious dose 50 (TCID 50 ) assay. Findings Concentrations of EtOH and IPA from 62% to 80% were very efficient at inactivating high numbers of HCoV dried on tile surfaces even with a 15 sec contact time. Concentrations of 95% dehydrated the virus, allowing infectious virus to survive. The CDC recommended 1/10 and 1/50 dilutions of SH were efficient at inactivating high numbers of HCoV dried on tile surfaces, whereas, a 1/100 dilution had substantially lower activity. Conclusions EtOH, IPA, and SH at multiple concentrations efficiently inactivated infectious virus on hard surfaces, typical of those found in public places. Often no remaining infectious HCoV could be detected.