Clip migration in stereotactic biopsy

Kass, Rena; Kumar, Grace V; Klimberg, V. Suzanne; Kass, Lawrence G.; Henry‐Tillman, Ronda; Johnson, Anita; Colvert, Maureen; Lane, Sarah; Harshfield, David L.; Korourian, Soheila; Parrish, Rudolph S.; Mancino, Anne T.

doi:10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00952-2

Cited by 75 publications

(41 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Clip migration is most frequently encountered after stereotactic biopsy, although also associated with the more recently introduced MRI procedures, albeit not as extensively documented [2,13,15,[36][37][38][39]. Compiling data from nine studies that verified clip position after vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy, it appears that 71.3% (743/1,042) of the cases exhibited a center target-clip average distance \10 mm on a two-view post-biopsy mammogram [2,15,16,29,30,32,36,40,41], with displacement \9 mm after 12 months follow up [15,42].…”

Section: Accuracy Of Clip Placement and Factors Accounting For Clip Mmentioning

confidence: 99%

A plea for the biopsy marker: how, why and why not clipping after breast biopsy?

Thomassin‐Naggara

Lalonde

David

et al. 2011

Breast Cancer Res Treat

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the last decade, percutaneous breast biopsies have become a standard for the management of breast diseases. Biopsy clips allow for precise lesion localization, thus minimizing the volume of breast to be resected at the time of surgery. With the development of many imaging techniques (including mammography, sonography, and breast magnetic resonance imaging), one of the challenges of the multidisciplinary became to synthesize all informations obtained from the various imaging procedures. The use of biopsy markers after percutaneous biopsy is one of the keys for optimal patient management, helping the radiologist to deal with multiple lesions, to insure correlation across different imaging modalities and to follow-up benign lesions, helping the oncologist by marking a tumor prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, helping the surgeon by facilitating preoperative needle localization, to precisely mark the margins of extensive disease and to guide intraoperative tumor resection, and helping the pathologist to insure the lesion of interest has been removed and to identify the region of interest in a mastectomy specimen. We believe biopsy clip markers should be deployed after all percutaneous interventions and present in this review the arguments to support this statement. Minimal indications for clip deployment will also be detailed.

show abstract

Section: Accuracy Of Clip Placement and Factors Accounting For Clip Mmentioning

confidence: 99%

A plea for the biopsy marker: how, why and why not clipping after breast biopsy?

Thomassin‐Naggara

Lalonde

David

et al. 2011

Breast Cancer Res Treat

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Frequently, all radiographic evidence of the lesion can be completely removed after SVAB, reportedly in up to 50-72% of cases. 1 This can make pre-operative localization challenging, forcing the radiologist to have to rely on mammographic landmarks and/or the presence of a haematoma for targeting. In the early to mid-1990s, the placement of a radiopaque metallic post-biopsy clip began gaining popularity in cases where the mammographic abnormality was determined to be no longer visible.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Performance of these markers is variable, with reported rates of displacement ,10 mm ranging from 54 to 99% in the literature. 1,[4][5][6][12][13][14] However, some of these higher published numbers are thought to be inflated, as displacement was measured with the breast still under compression on the stereotactic table, before the accordion effect is thought to take place. 6,12,14 In 2003, the first marker embedded within a biocompatible polymeric material was introduced to the market, the MammoMARK™ (Mammotome, Cincinnati, OH).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A prospective comparative study to evaluate the displacement of four commercially available breast biopsy markers

Pinkney

Mychajlowycz

Shah

2016

BJR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This issue is further complicated in situations where the original lesion is completely excised during the biopsy and the wire is placed using the clip as a guide. Clip migration occurs in about half of the cases, 14,15 adding to the challenge of localization. These factors are probably responsible for the high rate of positive margins after WL lumpectomy.…”

Section: Commentmentioning

confidence: 99%