The Arabidopsis TCH4 gene is up-regulated in expression by diverse environmental and hormonal stimuli. Because TCH4 encodes a xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase, this change in expression may reflect a recruitment of cell wallmodifying activity in response to environmental stress and growth. How diverse stimuli lead to the common response of TCH4 expression regulation is not known. Here, we show that induction of expression by the diverse stimuli of touch, darkness, cold, heat, and brassinosteroids (BRs) is conferred to reporter genes by the same 102-bp 5Ј-untranscribed TCH4 region; this result is consistent with the idea that shared regulatory elements are employed by diverse stimuli. Distal regions influence magnitude and kinetics of expression and likely harbor regulatory elements that are redundant with those located more proximal to the transcriptional start site. Substitution of the proximal regulatory region sequences in the context of distal elements does not disrupt inducible expression. TCH4 expression induction is transcriptional, at least in part because 5Ј-untranscribed sequences are sufficient to confer this regulation. However, 5Ј-untranslated sequences are necessary and sufficient to confer the marked transience of TCH4 expression, most likely through an effect on mRNA stability. Perception of BR is not necessary for TCH4::GUS induction by environmental stimuli because regulation is intact in the BR-insensitive mutant, bri1-2. The full response to auxin, however, requires the functioning of BRI1. Developmental expression of TCH4 is unlikely to be meditated by BR because TCH4::GUS is expressed in BR perception and biosynthetic mutants bri1-2 and det2-1, respectively.Plants are sensitive to a number of abiotic environmental stimuli including light, wind, and temperature. Changes in these environmental conditions often result in rapid and dramatic alterations in plant gene expression, and these molecular responses likely aid plants in acclimating to or withstanding the potential stresses of the environment.There are sets of genes that change their expression level in response to light stimuli (Ma et al., 2001), others that show elevated expression in extreme heat (Sung et al., 2001), and others that are induced in expression by cold (Thomashow, 1999). The existence of distinct gene sets that respond to different stimuli suggests that specific receptors and signal transduction pathways are utilized in response to alterations in light and different temperature extremes to drive distinct gene expression changes.In addition to genes whose expression is regulated in response to a single stimulus, there are genes that are induced in expression by multiple, diverse stimuli. For example, the TCH4 gene of Arabidopsis was originally discovered because of its dramatic response to the seemingly innocuous stimulus of touch (Braam and Davis, 1990). TCH4 encodes a xyloglucan endotransglucosylase/hydrolase (XTH, formerly abbreviated XET; Xu et al., 1995; Campbell and Braam, 1998). TCH4 is also up-regulated ...

No abstract

We sought to determine the genetic basis of expression of the ubiquitous (metabolic) urease of soybean. This isozyme is termed the metabolic urease because its loss, in eu4/eu4 mutants, leads to accumulation of urea, whereas loss of the embryo-specific urease isozyme does not. The eu4 lesion eliminated the expression of the ubiquitous urease in vegetative and embryonic tissues. RFLP analysis placed urease clone LC4 near, or within, the Eu4 locus. Sequence comparison of urease proteins (ubiquitous and embryo-specific) and clones (LC4 and LS1) indicated that LC4 and LS1 encode ubiquitous and embryo-specific ureases, respectively. That LC4 is transcribed into poly(A)+ RNA in all tissues was indicated by the amplification of its transcript by an LC4-specific PCR primer. (The LS1-specific primer, on the other hand, amplified poly(A)+ RNA only from developing embryos expressing the embryo-specific urease.) These observations are consistent with Eu4 being the ubiquitous urease structural gene contained in the LC4 clone. In agreement with this notion, the mutant phenotype of eu4/eu4 callus was partially corrected by the LC4 urease gene introduced by particle bombardment.

Roots of young soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) plants (up to 25 days old) contain two distinct urease isozymes, which are separable by hydroxyapatite chromatography. These two urease species (URE1 and URE2) differ in: (a) electrophoretic mobility in native gels, (b) pH dependence, and (c) recognition by a monoclonal antibody specific for the seed ("embryo-specific") urease. By these parameters root URE1 urease is similar to the abundant embryo-specific urease isozyme, while root URE2 resembles the "ubiquitous" urease which has previously been found in all soybean tissues examined (leaf, embryo, seed coat, and cultured cells). The embryo-specific and ubiquitous urease isozymes are products of the Eul and Eu4 structural genes, respectively. Roots of the eul-sun/eul-sun genotype, which lacks the embryo-specific urease (i.e. 'seed urease-null'), contain no URE1 urease activity. Roots of eu4/eu4, which lacks ubiquitous urease, lack the URE2 (leaflike) urease activity. From these genetic and biochemical criteria, then, we conclude that UREl and URE2 are the embryo-specific and ubiquitous ureases, respectively. Adventitious roots generated from cuttings of any urease genotype lack URE1 activity. In seedling roots the seedlike (URE1) activity declines during development. Roots of 3-week-old plants contain 5% of the total UREI activity of the radicle of 4-day-old seedlings, which, in turn, has approximately the same urease activity level as the dormant embryonic axis. The embryo-specific urease incorporates label from [35S]methionine during embryo development but not during germination, indicating that there is no de novo synthesis of the embryo-specific (URE1) urease in the germinating root. We conclude that the seedlike urease (URE1) found in roots of young soybean plants is a remnant of the Eul-encoded, abundant, embryo-specific urease which accumulates in the embryonic root axis during seed development.

No abstract