Decreased renal perfusion and function are induced by IAP pressure of 14 mmHg. These adverse effects are probably related to interference with the NO system, and could be partially ameliorated by pretreatment with NTG.
Endothelin-1 (ET-1) at high concentrations has marked antidiuretic and antinatriuretic activities, whereas its precursor, big endothelin-1 (big ET-1), has surprisingly potent diuretic and natriuretic actions. The mechanisms underlying the excretory effects of big ET-1 have not been fully elucidated. To explore these mechanisms, we examined the effects of a highly selective ET(B) antagonist (A-192621.1), a calcium channel blocker (verapamil), a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor (N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester [L-NAME]), and a cyclooxygenase inhibitor (indomethacin) on the systemic and renal actions of big ET-1 in anesthetized rats. An intravenous bolus injection of incremental doses of big ET-1 (0.3, 1. 0, and 3.0 nmol/kg) produced a significant hypertensive effect that was dose dependent and prolonged (from 113+/-7 mm Hg to a maximum of 148+/-6 mm Hg). The administration of big ET-1 induced marked diuretic and natriuretic responses (urinary flow rate increased from 8.5+/-1 to 110+/-14 microL/min, and fractional excretion of sodium increased from 0.38+/-0.13% to 7.51+/-1.24%). Glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow significantly decreased only at the highest dose of big ET-1. Pretreatment with A-192621.1 (3 mg/kg plus 3 mg. kg(-1). h(-1)) significantly abolished the diuretic (17+/-5 microL/min to a maximum of 19+/-3 microL/min) and natriuretic (0. 29+/-0.1% to a maximum of 1.93+/-0.37%) responses induced by big ET-1. Moreover, A-192621.1 potentiated the decline in glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow and the increase in mean arterial blood pressure produced by the low doses of big ET-1. Similar to A-192621.1, pretreatment with a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor (L-NAME, 10 mg/kg plus 5 mg. kg(-1). h(-1)) significantly and comparably reduced the diuretic and natriuretic actions of big ET-1 and augmented the hypoperfusion/hypofiltration and systemic vasoconstriction induced by high doses of the peptide. Pretreatment with verapamil (2 mg. kg(-1). h(-1)) slightly inhibited the diuretic/natriuretic effects of the high-dose big ET-1 and completely prevented the increase in mean arterial blood pressure provoked by the peptide. Unlike verapamil and L-NAME, only indomethacin administration was associated with significant natriuretic/diuretic responses and did not influence the pressor effect and renal actions of big ET-1. Taken together, these results suggest that big ET-1-induced diuretic and natriuretic responses are mediated mainly by stimulation of nitric oxide production coupled to ET(B) receptor subtype activation.
are not yet fully clarified, it is well accepted that nephrin and podocin are involved in the development of proteinuria. The effects of early treatment with various antiproteinuric therapies on proteinuria and glomerular staining of nephrin and podocin in rats with experimental NS have not been previously studied. Proteinuria and glomerular nephrin and podocin immunofluorescence were examined in rat kidneys with adriamycin-induced NS and the effects of antiproteinuric drug therapies during 5 wk with enalapril, losartan, alone or in combination, omapatrilat, and mycophenolate mofetil on these parameters were assessed. Injection of adriamycin caused a significant increase in daily (from 21.8 Ϯ 1.4 to 983.1 Ϯ 45.8 mg/day, P Ͻ 0.01) and cumulative protein excretion (from negligible values to 22,490 Ϯ 931 mg, P Ͻ 0.001) during 5 wk. Early treatment with enalapril significantly decreased the daily (641.7 Ϯ 82.4 mg/day, P Ͻ 0.0023) and cumulative proteinuria (15,727 Ϯ 2,204 mg, P Ͻ 0.001). A similar effect, although to a lesser extent, was obtained after omapatrilat treatment: cumulative proteinuria was reduced to 18,706 Ϯ 1,042 mg, P Ͻ 0.001. In contrast, losartan treatment did not significantly influence the cumulative proteinuria that remained comparable (20,351 Ϯ 1,360 mg, P Ͼ 0.05) to that observed in untreated NS rats. Unexpectedly, when losartan was given in combination with enalapril, it abolished the beneficial effects of the latter. Pretreatment with mycophenolate mofetil exerted a moderate antiproteinuric effect, which appeared only during the last week of the experimental treatment. Nephrotic rats exhibited severe disruption of slit diaphragm structure as seen by rapid and profound loss of nephrin and podocin. Beneficial effects of enalapril, omapatrilat, and mycophenolate mofetil paralleled the preservation of nephrin, as determined immunohistochemically, and enabled prediction of significant antiproteinuric responses. Enalapril alone or in combination with losartan resulted in significant preservation of podocin. Pretreatment with enalapril, and to a lesser extent omapatrilat, is superior to losartan in reducing proteinuria in NS rats. A combination of ACE inhibitors with ANG II receptor blockers does not provide any advantageous antiproteinuric therapy in these animals. Nephrin loss is an indication of proteinuria in NS and the antiproteinuric effects of ACE inhibitors, vasopeptidase inhibitors, and mycophenolate mofetil attenuate this reduction. Not all the drugs which restore podocin reduce urinary protein in NS.adriamycin; proteinuria ADRIAMYCIN (ADR)-induced nephrotic syndrome (NS) in the rat is characterized by massive proteinuria, hypoalbuminemia, dyslipidemia, hypercoagulability, edema, and ascites formation (5,16,25,26). The common denominator of this experimental nephropathy, which mimics minimal change disease and various primary and secondary kidney diseases such as diabetic nephropathy, systemic lupus erythematosus and others, is glomerular dysfunction resulting in a massive proteinuria (8)....
Decompensated congestive heart failure renders rats susceptible to the adverse renal effects of pneumoperitoneum, a phenomenon that may involve alterations in the renal nitric oxide system.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.