We report the establishment of a library of micromolded elastomeric micropost arrays to modulate substrate rigidity independently of effects on adhesive and other material surface properties. We demonstrate that micropost rigidity impacts cell morphology, focal adhesions, cytoskeletal contractility, and stem cell differentiation. Furthermore, early changes in cytoskeletal contractility predicted later stem cell fate decisions at the single cell level.Cell function is regulated primarily by extracellular stimuli, including soluble and adhesive factors that bind to cell surface receptors. Recent evidence suggests that mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM), particularly rigidity, can also mediate cell signaling, proliferation, differentiation, and migration 1,2 . Culturing cells on hydrogels derived from natural ECM proteins at different densities has dramatic effects on cell adhesion, morphology, and function 3 . However, changing densities of the gels impacts not only mechanical rigidity, but also the amount of ligand, leaving uncertainty as to the relevant contribution of these two matrix properties on the observed cellular response. Synthetic ECM analogs such as polyacrylamide or polyethylene glycol gels, which vary rigidity by modulating the amount of cross-linker, has revealed that substrate rigidity alone can modulate many cellular functions, including stem cell differentiation 4-6 . However, altered cross-linker amount impacts not only bulk mechanics, but also molecular-scale material properties including porosity, surface chemistry, backbone flexibility, and binding properties of immobilized adhesive ligands 7,8 . Consequently, whether cells transduce substrate rigidity at the microscopic scale (eg sensing the rigidity between adhesion sites) or the nanoscopic scale (eg sensing local alterations in receptor-ligand binding characteristics) remains an open question 7,8 . While hydrogels will continue to play a major role in characterizing and controlling cell-material interactions, alternative approaches are necessary to further elucidate the basis by which cells sense changes in substrate rigidity.

When cells move using integrin-based focal adhesions, they pull in the direction of motion with large, ∼100 Pa, stresses that contract the substrate. Integrin-mediated adhesions, however, are not required for in vivo confined migration. During focal adhesion-free migration, the transmission of propelling forces, and their magnitude and orientation, are not understood. Here, we combine theory and experiments to investigate the forces involved in adhesion-free migration. Using a non-adherent blebbing cell line as a model, we show that actin cortex flows drive cell movement through nonspecific substrate friction. Strikingly, the forces propelling the cell forward are several orders of magnitude lower than during focal-adhesion-based motility. Moreover, the force distribution in adhesion-free migration is inverted: it acts to expand, rather than contract, the substrate in the direction of motion. This fundamentally different mode of force transmission may have implications for cell-cell and cell-substrate interactions during migration in vivo.

Protrusion formation is an essential step during cell migration. Cells migrating in three-dimensional environments and in vivo can form a wide variety of protrusion types, including actin polymerizationdriven lamellipodia, and contractility-driven blebs. The ability to switch between different protrusions has been proposed to facilitate motility in complex environments and to promote cancer dissemination. However, plasticity in protrusion formation has so far mostly been investigated in the context of transitions between amoeboid and mesenchymal migration modes, which involve substantial changes in overall cell morphology. As a result, the minimal requirements of transitions between blebs and lamellipodia, as well as the time scales on which they occur, remain unknown. To address these questions, we investigated protrusion switching during cell migration at the single cell level. Using cells that can be induced to form either blebs or lamellipodia, we systematically assessed the mechanical requirements, as well as the dynamics, of switching between protrusion types. We demonstrate that shifting the balance between actin protrusivity and actomyosin contractility leads to immediate transitions between blebs and lamellipodia in migrating cells. Switching occurred without changes in global cell shape, polarity, or cell adhesion. Furthermore, rapid transitions between blebs and lamellipodia could also be triggered upon changes in substrate adhesion during migration on micropatterned surfaces. Together, our data reveal that the type of protrusion formed by migrating cells can be dynamically controlled independently of overall cell morphology, suggesting that protrusion formation is an autonomous module in the regulatory network that controls the plasticity of cell migration.

We describe the use of a microfabricated cell culture substrate, consisting of a uniform array of closely spaced, vertical, elastomeric microposts, to study the effects of substrate rigidity on cell function. Elastomeric micropost substrates are micromolded from silicon masters comprised of microposts of different heights to yield substrates of different rigidities. The tips of the elastomeric microposts are functionalized with extracellular matrix through microcontact printing to promote cell adhesion. These substrates, therefore, present the same topographical cues to adherent cells while varying substrate rigidity only through manipulation of micropost height. This protocol describes how to fabricate the silicon micropost array masters (~2 weeks to complete) and elastomeric substrates (3 d), as well as how to perform cell culture experiments (1-14 d), immunofluorescence imaging (2 d), traction force analysis (2 d) and stem cell differentiation assays (1 d) on these substrates in order to examine the effect of substrate rigidity on stem cell morphology, traction force generation, focal adhesion organization and differentiation.

In the pursuit to understand the interaction between cells and their underlying substrates, the life sciences are beginning to incorporate micro- and nanotechnology-based tools to probe and measure cells. The development of these tools portends endless possibilities for new insights into the fundamental relationships between cells and their surrounding microenvironment that underlie the physiology of human tissue. Here, we review techniques and tools that have been used to study how a cell responds to the physical factors in its environment. We also discuss unanswered questions that could be addressed by these approaches to better elucidate the molecular processes and mechanical forces that dominate the interactions between cells and their physical scaffolds.

. Mechanisms of epithelial cell-cell adhesion and cell compaction revealed by high-resolution tracking of E-cadheringreen fluorescent protein.

Our recent advancements in RNA nanotechnology introduced novel nanoscaffolds (nanorings); however, the potential of their use for biomedical applications was never fully revealed. As presented here, besides functionalization with multiple different short interfering RNAs for combinatorial RNA interference (e.g., against multiple HIV-1 genes), nanorings also allow simultaneous embedment of assorted RNA aptamers, fluorescent dyes, proteins, as well as recently developed RNA–DNA hybrids aimed to conditionally activate multiple split functionalities inside cells.

SummaryDuring development, cells undergo dramatic changes in their morphology. By affecting contact geometry, these morphological changes could influence cellular communication. However, it has remained unclear whether and how signaling depends on contact geometry. This question is particularly relevant for Notch signaling, which coordinates neighboring cell fates through direct cell-cell signaling. Using micropatterning with a receptor trans-endocytosis assay, we show that signaling between pairs of cells correlates with their contact area. This relationship extends across contact diameters ranging from microns to tens of microns. Mathematical modeling predicts that dependence of signaling on contact area can bias cellular differentiation in Notch-mediated lateral inhibition processes, such that smaller cells are more likely to differentiate into signal-producing cells. Consistent with this prediction, analysis of developing chick inner ear revealed that ligand-producing hair cell precursors have smaller apical footprints than non-hair cells. Together, these results highlight the influence of cell morphology on fate determination processes.