Summary Some heavy oil reservoirs in western Canada and Venezuela show anomalously high primary recovery under solution gas drive process. The pressure decline rate in these reservoirs is low compared to that expected under solution gas drive in conventional oil reservoirs. There is now increasing evidence that gas mobility is extremely low in these reservoirs. The objective of this study is to conduct solution gas drive experiments in a sandpack saturated with a heavy oil and examine the effect of depletion rate. Depletion rate was varied by more than two orders of magnitude. The results showed that gas mobility was a function of depletion rate and decreased with increasing depletion rate. Other notable observations were that supersaturation increased with depletion rate and that critical gas saturation was 3 to 4%, slightly increasing with increasing depletion rate. Interpretation of the results confirmed that gas mobility is quite low. Representation of the low mobilities using relative permeability required low values of the order of 10-5-10-4, which decreased with increasing depletion rate. Introduction Some of the heavy oil reservoirs in western Canada1-2 and Venezuela3 show anomalous behavior under solution gas drive. Once below the bubblepoint pressure, the producing GOR does not increase sharply, and the rate of pressure drop is low. Relatively high primary recovery factors in excess of 10% have been reported from some of these reservoirs. Similar behavior is being reported in other heavy oil reservoirs in China and Albania.4,4 To explain the anomalously high primary recovery under solution gas drive, several theories were initially proposed.1,3,6-9 Most researchers now agree that the gas mobility in this process is extremely low10,11 and leads to effective oil recovery. In this paper, we present the data of carefully conducted depletion experiments in heavy oil and investigate the effect of depletion rate on the solution gas drive process. Effect of depletion rate in solution gas drive in light oils has received previous attention. 12-14 Here, using a heavy oil, we present the pressure and recovery data when depletion rate is varied by more than two orders of magnitude. The data are then interpreted using a simplified method to show the effect of depletion rate on gas relative permeability. Literature Review The behavior of heavy oil reservoirs under solution gas drive has intrigued the oil industry for over a decade now.1,2 However, research on solution gas drive dates to much earlier years. In the early '50s, Stewart et al.12 examined solution gas drive in heterogeneous limestones. They showed that the relative permeability of external gas drive is different from that under solution gas drive. Furthermore, they found that higher rate of depletion leads to higher oil recovery. The authors attributed this to a larger number of gas bubbles at higher depletion rates, which in turn leads to lower gas/oil relative permeability ratio. Later, Handy13 used two oils with dead oil viscosities of 1.8 and 25 cp and confirmed the same conclusions for solution gas drive in a sandstone core. Dumore14 conducted solution gas drive experiments in two high permeability sandpacks of 15 and 350 darcy. He suggested that conditions that led to more gas dispersion led to higher recovery. The author showed that higher rate of pressure drop and higher permeability lead to more gas dispersion. All of the above authors were interested in behavior of solution gas drive in light oils. Extensive research in solution gas drive in heavy oils was initiated following Smith's1 publication reporting high oil recovery and production rate in some heavy oil reservoirs under primary depletion. He suggested that in these reservoirs, gas flows in the form of tiny bubbles in heavy oil. He further stated that these gas bubbles do not coalesce to form a continuous gas phase. Maini et al.6 suggested that a discontinuous gas phase is dispersed within the continuous oil phase and used the term "foamy oil flow" to describe the flow. Later, Bora et al.15 studied the effect of rate of depletion on bubble nucleation and the foamy oil flow in a micromodel. They concluded that the higher rate of pressure drop results in the nucleation of more bubbles and more dispersed flow. To explain the favorable performance of solution gas drive in heavy oils, a geomechanical effect (i.e., formation of "wormholes," which are essentially high-permeability channels), has also been proposed.8 The present study investigates the behavior of heavy oil reservoirs in the absence of geomechanical effects. Shen and Batycky9 suggested increased oil mobility because of lubrication caused by nucleation of bubbles at pore walls as a possible mechanism leading to enhanced primary recovery. Some authors have suggested that high critical gas saturation may explain the high recoveries observed.3,6,16 In a detailed study, Li and Yortsos17 developed a network model and studied the effect of depletion rate on critical gas saturation. The authors concluded that for sequential nucleation, critical gas saturation increases with depletion rate. In more recent works,7,18 the gas phase mobility under solution gas drive experiments in heavy oil was determined. It was found that gas mobility in heavy oil is much lower than that in light oil.7 The low gas mobility was suggested to lead to improved oil recovery. It is not, however, known what factors affect gas mobility. Various observations from the literature suggest that solution gas drive in heavy oil depends on depletion rate, similar to what has been observed in light oils.12–14 However, no systematic study has been reported yet. The objective of this paper is to investigate the effect of depletion rate on solution gas drive in heavy oil. Flow rate, pressure, and pressure drop information will be analyzed to infer relative permeability functions. Earlier12 as well as more recent studies19 suggest that gas relative permeability under internal drive is different from that under external drive. There are only few published data7,18 of gas relative permeability in the presence of heavy oil, using depletion techniques. These studies have used the core depletion set-up to represent the solution gas drive process. In this study, a similar apparatus was set up to conduct the desired experiments. Several improvements were made to perform the experiment under highly controlled conditions. Pressure was measured at different points along the length of the sandpack. The core-holder was rotated to negate gravity affects. Overburden and axial pressures were applied during the experiments. A connate water saturation was established in the sandpack, and more accurate pressure transducers were used. The experimental setup and procedure is explained in the following. This is followed by presentation of the experimental results and their analysis.
Some of the heavy oil reservoirs in Western Canada and Venezuela show anomalously high primary recovery under solution gas drive process. Pressure decline rate in these reservoirs is low compared to that expected under solution gas drive in conventional oil reservoirs. Several theories have been proposed for these anomalous behaviors. The objective of this study is to examine one of the proposed theories, which suggests that gas mobility in heavy oil is low. In this study, gas mobility under solution gas drive is measured by performing depletion experiments. The depletion was carried out at four different rates. The Eclipse-100 Black oil simulator was used to match the experimental data. The direct results from the experiments show that the critical gas saturation is not very high. Thus, critical gas saturation cannot explain high recovery. However, it was found that the gas mobility in heavy oil is quite low, when compared to that expected in conventional oil. Experimental results indicated that higher rates of pressure drop resulted in higher super-saturation, higher critical gas saturation and lower relative permeability to gas. Physical explanation of the observed behavior is offered in light of the anomalous behavior of heavy oil reservoirs. An empirical model was developed to predict gas mobility, critical gas saturation and supersaturation as a function of depletion rate for the system studied. Introduction When the pressure is lowered below the bubble point in an undersaturated reservoir, the gas phase is generated. The gas phase, being compressible, helps in maintaining the reservoir pressure and hence provides the driving force for primary production. Gas does not flow as an independent phase until it reaches certain saturation known as the Critical Gas Saturation. After this, free gas flows as an independent phase resulting in rapid decline in reservoir pressure. This mode of recovery is known as Solution Gas Drive. Critical Gas Saturation, is defined here, as the gas saturation at which a steady, although intermittent, gas flow can be sustained. Some of the heavy oil reservoirs in Western Canada and Venezuela show anomalous behavior under solution gas drive. Once below the bubble point pressure, producing GOR does not increase sharply and rate of pressure drop is low. Some wells have shown much higher oil rates than can be theoretically explained using conventional recovery performance criterion. The overall recovery under solution gas drive is higher than that expected from a similar conventional oil reservoir. Several theories1–8, 27–28 have been proposed for this anomalously high primary recovery under solution gas drive. One theory1,8 attributes this favorable behavior to low gas phase mobility in heavy oil. The low gas mobility implies lower gas velocity, which results in gas retention and pressure maintenance in the reservoir. Finally, this leads to higher primary recovery. Research was initiated to study solution gas drive in heavy oil, and investigate the reasons for this favorable behavior. Experiments are done on an unconsolidated sand-pack at various depletion rates and the effect of rate of depletion on critical gas saturation and supersaturation was studied. Further, the experimental results are used to determine mobility of gas phase at various depletion rates. Production and pressure data obtained from depletion are matched on a commercial reservoir simulator by adjusting critical gas saturation and gas relative permeability values.
Some of the heavy oil reservoirs in Alberta and Western Saskatchewan show anomalously high primary recovery and high flow rate under solution gas drive. Several theories have been proposed for the anomalous behaviour. However, only a few theories look at the basic physics of the problem and find out the reason for this favourable behaviour. The process of solution gas drive involves nucleation of gas bubbles followed by bubble growth and finally flow of gas. In his work, the aspect of bubble growth is studied in heavy oil and in light oil. A numerical model is developed, including the hydrodynamic and mass transfer effects to investigate the effect of viscous and diffusional forces on bubble growth. An objective of the paper is to show that the effect of oil viscosity on bubble growth might be insignificant, even for heavy oils. A secondary objective is to examine the validity of the popular rowth model of R(t) = atb, when both diffusional and hydrodynamic forces are acting. The case of a gradual decline in pressure is studied, which more closely simulates the reservoir condition, and is compared with a step decline in pressure. It is found that the constants a and b in the above model need to be found for the conditions of interest; they depend on oil-type, rate of pressure drop, mass transfer boundary condition, etc. In another part of the paper, the gas phase growth during the solution gas drive experiment is modelled and the effect of various parameters, such as viscosity, depletion rate and diffusion coefficient, on the process is studied. It is found that, in a constant volumetric rate of depletion process, the system compressibility might remain unchanged for some time, even after bubbles have nucleated and while they are growing. Hence, the maximum supersaturation observed does not have to correspond with the nucleation pressure. Introduction The process of solution gas drive involves nucleation of bubbles in oil as the pressure falls below the bubblepoint pressure, following which the bubbles grow. During growth, the bubbles come in contact with each other and, with the breaking of the lamella, coalesce to form interconnected gas bubbles, often with multiple branches. The process of solution gas drive in heavy oil reservoirs shows a number of anomalies when compared to that in a light oil reservoir. A number of theories(1-7) have been proposed to explain this behaviour of the heavy oil reservoir. However, only a few look at the basic physics of the problem. In this paper, an attempt has been made to study bubble growth with specific application to the solution gas drive process by looking at the physics of bubble growth and study the effect of viscosity and other parameters. As a first step, a single bubble growth in bulk is considered and the effect of the porous medium is not included. The bubble growth in light oil, is compared with that in heavy oil, and the reason for the differences sought.
The favourable behaviour of heavy oil reservoirs under solution- gas drive has intrigued the oil industry for a long time. Many mechanistic models have been proposed to explain this behaviour. This paper investigates one of the theories that attributes the low producing GOR and high recovery of heavy oil to low gas mobility. A simulation study was carried out on a commercial black oil simulator to match the "typical" production data of heavy oil fields in Lindbergh and Frog Lake. Sensitivity studies were carried out to investigate the effect of gas relative permeability on oil recovery. The effect of sand production, which is an integral part of heavy oil production in Western Canada, was also investigated. A parameter was used in the simulator to account for the increased permeability due to sand production. The results indicate that the field performance can be matched by using low gas mobility and incorporating improved permeability due to sand production. Neither of them alone was sufficient for matching the field performance. The use of a low gas mobility was successful to explain high pressure-gradients in the field, by acting as a pressure maintenance mechanism, and leading to a high recovery under solution-gas drive. Intruduction PanCanadian has been one of the major operators in the Lindbergh and Frog Lake heavy oil fields of northeast Alberta(1). The production in these fields is from the Upper Mannville group. The producing formations contain oil of 12 – 14 ° API with in situ viscosities of 3,000 – 10,000 cp. The fields have shown recovery much in excess of what can be predicted by applying conventional flow equations. Many heavy oil wells under primary production have produced about 15% of the original oil in place (OOIP) in 10 years(1). The primary oil production in these fields is accompanied by sand production and is called "Cold Production." A typical well in the Lindbergh and Frog Lake fields under depletion has produced an average of 9,200 m3 of oil and about 230 m3 of sand in 1,000 days(1). Several tests have been carried out to determine the mechanism responsible for the favourable behaviour of these reservoirs. Metwally and Solanki(1) presented a simulation model to match the field production behaviour. The authors postulated that reservoir porosity and permeability are increased due to sand production. Additionally, the authors showed that a pressure support mechanism needs to be incorporated to match recovery data; an external aquifer was therefore incorporated into the model. Similar to Metwally and Solanki(1), we use a commercial simulator to match the production data. We show that the use of low values for gas relative permeability results in pressure maintenance and substantial oil production. Accounting for the low gas mobility along with the improved permeability resulted in a match of the field data. Sensitivity studies are reported, which show that both the effects of low gas mobility and improved permeability are required for a match.
Summary Boscán is a giant multibillion-barrel heavy-oil (10.5 °API and asphaltic) field in Venezuela. Although a large part of the field is on primary production with a low recovery factor (<6%), water injection has been successfully implemented in portions of the field for more than 15 years, with improved recovery. High-mobility-ratio-waterflood (HMRWF) behavior and associated key production mechanisms obtained from detailed field-data analysis and dynamic modeling are presented. A novel and unique infill configuration is also proposed to further improve recovery in this environment with a high (or adverse) mobility ratio. Water injection in such heavy oil was previously considered not effective by the industry because of adverse mobility ratio. However, water injection for pressure maintenance (WIPM) was successfully implemented using a new pattern configuration, a pseudo-1-3-1 inverted- spot pattern (an additional row of producers between conventional-pattern rows). Field-data and reservoir-simulation models show increased reservoir pressure up to the second row of producers from the injector. The pressure support is used to significantly improve recovery using the unique configuration at low water cut. WIPM has already resulted in significant reserves addition. Current production from water-injection areas is approximately 40,000 MBOPD (or approximately 47% of field production). However, it is estimated that because of high oil viscosity, a significant amount of oil remains bypassed in the WIPM area. An infill opportunity was identified from an integrated reservoir-management study that included detailed WIPM data analysis and dynamic (mechanistic and full-field) modeling. A unique infill configuration is proposed that conceptually uses the current injectors with an additional row of producers between the existing first and second row of the producers. This configuration has the potential to economically unlock millions of barrels of bypassed oil and significantly increase recovery in this prolific heavy-oil field. This study provides insights into HMRWF behavior, evaluating the relative effect of displacement vs. pressure. The unique and novel infill configuration can be used to improve recovery, a step vital to monetize this large resource in the low-price environment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.