Rationale Pediatric COVID‐19 studies have been mostly restricted to case reports and small case series, which have prevented the identification of specific pediatric lung disease patterns in COVID‐19. The overarching goal of this systematic review and meta‐analysis is to provide the first comprehensive summary of the findings of published studies thus far describing COVID‐19 lung imaging data in the pediatric population. Methods A systematic literature search of PubMed was performed to identify studies assessing lung‐imaging features of COVID‐19 pediatric patients (0–18 years). A single‐arm meta‐analysis was conducted to obtain the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results A total of 29 articles (n = 1026 children) based on chest computerized tomography (CT) images were included. The main results of this comprehensive analysis are as follows: (1) Over a third of pediatric patients with COVID‐19 (35.7%, 95% CI: 27.5%–44%) had normal chest CT scans and only 27.7% (95% CI: 19.9%–35.6%) had bilateral lesions. (2) The most typical pediatric chest CT findings of COVID‐19 were ground‐glass opacities (GGO) (37.2%, 95% CI: 29.3%–45%) and the presence of consolidations or pneumonic infiltrates (22.3%, 95% CI: 17.8%–26.9%). (3) The lung imaging findings in children with COVID‐19 were overall less frequent and less severe than in adult patients. (4) Typical lung imaging features of viral respiratory infections in the pediatric population such as increased perihilar markings and hyperinflation were not reported in children with COVID‐19. Conclusion Chest CT manifestations in children with COVID‐19 could potentially be used for early identification and prompt intervention in the pediatric population.

No abstract

Rationale Chest radiography (CXR) is a noninvasive imaging approach commonly used to evaluate lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in children. However, the specific imaging patterns of pediatric coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) on CXR, their relationship to clinical outcomes, and the possible differences from LRTIs caused by other viruses in children remain to be defined. Methods This is a cross‐sectional study of patients seen at a pediatric hospital with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) (n = 95). Patients were subdivided in infants (0–2 years, n = 27), children (3–10 years, n = 27), and adolescents (11–19 years, n = 41). A sample of young children (0–2 years, n = 68) with other viral lower respiratory infections (LRTI) was included to compare their CXR features with the subset of infants (0–2 years) with COVID‐19. Results Forty‐five percent of pediatric patients with COVID‐19 were hospitalized and 20% required admission to intensive care unit (ICU). The most common abnormalities identified were ground‐glass opacifications (GGO)/consolidations (35%) and increased peribronchial markings/cuffing (33%). GGO/consolidations were more common in older individuals and perihilar markings were more common in younger subjects. Subjects requiring hospitalization or ICU admission had significantly more GGO/consolidations in CXR (p < .05). Typical CXR features of pediatric viral LRTI (e.g., hyperinflation) were more common in non‐COVID‐19 viral LRTI cases than in COVID‐19 cases (p < .05). Conclusions CXR may be a complemental exam in the evaluation of moderate or severe pediatric COVID‐19 cases. The severity of GGO/consolidations seen in CXR is predictive of clinically relevant outcomes. Hyperinflation could potentially aid clinical assessment in distinguishing COVID‐19 from other types of viral LRTI in young children.

Vocal cord paralysis is a common cause of respiratory and feeding problems in the pediatric population. While the causes of vocal cord paralysis are multiple, iatrogenic injury of the recurrent laryngeal nerve after cardiovascular surgery is the most frequent cause. Vocal cord paralysis increases the risk of swallowing dysfunction, tracheal aspiration and pneumonia. It also increases the need for nasoenteric feeds and gastrostomy tube placement. Flexible nasopharyngolaryngoscopy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing vocal cord paralysis, but it has significant drawbacks: it is uncomfortable, it can trigger a cardiovascular event in children with unstable cardiovascular status, it can be challenging to perform, and it can be difficult to interpret. Laryngeal US has become a popular imaging modality to evaluate the function of the vocal cords. Laryngeal US is well-tolerated, easy to perform, simple to interpret and has a lower physiological impact compared to flexible nasopharyngolaryngoscopy. Laryngeal US is an accurate and low-cost diagnostic test for vocal cord paralysis. In this review, we describe the anatomy of the larynx and recurrent laryngeal nerve; the causes, symptoms and pathophysiology of vocal cord paralysis; laryngeal US technique; diagnostic criteria for vocal cord paralysis; and a reporting system.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract