In this study we investigate the hypothesis that increasing channel depth in estuaries can amplify both tides and storm surge by developing an idealized numerical model representing the 1888, 1975, and 2015 bathymetric conditions of the Cape Fear River Estuary, NC. Archival tide gauge data recovered from the U.S. National Archives indicates that mean tidal range in Wilmington has doubled to 1.55 m since the 1880s, with a much smaller increase of 0.07 m observed near the ocean boundary. These tidal changes are reproduced by simulating channel depths of 7 m (1888 condition) and 15.5 m (modern condition). Similarly, model sensitivity studies using idealized, parametric tropical cyclones suggest that the storm surge in the worst‐case, CAT‐5 event may have increased from 3.8 ± 0.25 m to 5.6 ± 0.6 m since the nineteenth century. The amplification in both tides and storm surge is influenced by reduced hydraulic drag caused by greater mean depths.
Shipping channels in many estuaries around the world have been deepened by a factor of two or more since the mid-19th century, with deep-draft ships requiring increasingly wide and deep shipping channels (e.g., . At the same time, channelization, reclamation, and diking has often reduced connectivity to wetlands and reduced estuary width. Consequences include increased salinity intrusion (e.g., , altered tidal velocities (e.g., Pareja-Roman et al., 2020) and an upstream movement of the estuary turbidity maximum (see review by Burchard et al., 2018, and references therein). Reduced frictional resistance in a deeper channel leads to reduced damping of long-wave energy.
We develop idealized analytical and numerical models to study how storm surge amplitudes vary within frictional, weakly convergent, nonreflective estuaries. Friction is treated using Chebyshev polynomials. Storm surge is represented as the sum of two sinusoidal components, and a third constituent represents the semidiurnal tide (D 2 ). An empirical fit of storm surge shows that two sinusoidal components adequately represent storm surge above a baseline value (R 2 = 0.97). We find that the spatial transformation of surge amplitudes depends on the depth of the estuary, and characteristics of the surge wave including time scale, amplitude, asymmetry, and surge-tide relative phase. Analytical model results indicate that surge amplitude decays more slowly (larger e-folding) in a deeper channel for all surge time scales (12-72 hr). Deepening of an estuary results in larger surge amplitudes. Sensitivity studies show that surges with larger primary amplitudes (or shorter time scales) damp faster than those with smaller amplitudes (or larger time scales). Moreover, results imply that there is a location with maximum sensitivity to altered depth, offshore surge amplitude, and time scale and that the location of observed maximum change in surge amplitude along an estuary of simple form moves upstream when depth is increased. Further, the relative phase of surge to tide and surge asymmetry can change the spatial location of maximum change in surge. The largest change due to increased depth occurs for a large surge with a short time scale. The results suggest that both sea level rise and channel deepening may also alter surge amplitudes.Plain Language Summary Many estuaries around the world are heavily altered from their natural state. Wetlands have been reclaimed, and shipping channels widened and deepened to accommodate large container ships. The effects on storm surge and flood risk are just beginning to be explored. In this paper we employ a theoretical approach to understand how the characteristics of a storm surge-such as how fast it is moving, how big it is, and whether it happens on flood or ebb tide-change how it behaves in an estuary. Our results show that storm surge generally gets larger when channels are dredged and deepened; the largest amplification is observed for fast-moving storms with a short time scale, within estuaries that are highly frictional. Other characteristics-such as the timing relative to the tide and the shape of the estuary-also impact the amplitude and the amount of sensitivity to changing conditions. We find that channel deepening effects are negligible at the coast and far upstream. In between, a region of maximum sensitivity to dredging occurs. Thus, changes in flood risk due to channel deepening and sea level rise can be spatially variable, even within a single estuary.
Natural and local anthropogenic changes in estuaries (e.g., sea-level rise, navigation channel construction and loss of wetlands) interact with each other and produce nonlinear effects. There is also a growing recognition that tides in estuaries are not stationary. These factors together are changing the estuarine water level regime, however the implications for extreme water levels remain largely unknown. Changes over the past century in many estuaries, such as channel deepening and streamlining for navigation have significantly altered the hydrodynamics of long waves, often resulting in amplified tides (a ~85% increase in Wilmington, NC since 1900) and storm surge in estuaries. This research focuses on establishing analytical and numerical models that simulate a wide range of systems and flow conditions that combine multiple flood sources: astronomical tide, storm surge, and high river flow. To investigate the effects of estuarine bathymetry conditions (e.g., channel depth, convergence length), hurricane conditions (e.g., pressure and wind field), river discharge, and surge characteristics (e.g., time scale and amplitude and relative phase) on tide and storm surge propagation, I develop an idealized analytical model and two numerical models using Delft-3D. The Cape Fear River Estuary, NC (CFRE), and St Johns River Estuary, FL (SJRE) are used as case studies to investigate flood dynamics. The analytical approach has been compared and verified with idealized numerical models. I use data recovery, data analysis, and idealized numerical modeling of the CFRE to investigate the effects of bathymetric changes (e.g., dredging and channel I would like to express my sincere gratitude and appreciation to my advisor, Dr. Stefan Talke, who made the journey possible and provided me with invaluable guidance, unfailing encouragement, and endless support. He has encouraged me to try and learn new stuff and expand my knowledge. Without his guidance and persistent help this dissertation would not have been possible. Dear Stefan, thanks for always being there for me and believing in me. My gratitude also extends to Dr. David Jay, who has the attitude and the substance of a genius, for his help and valuable comments and discussions throughout this research study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.