Focus of this research is to describe administrative reform process in one country, by finding the strategies of administrative reform in transforming and developing administration system in Japan. Descriptive qualitative analysis by study literature and examining secondary data as a data collection method use in this research. The result show that there are three strategies successful of administrative reform: (1) reorganizations; (2) deregulations; and (3) decentralization. The conclusion of this research that are government must used its power to achieve the stated reform goals. The Japanese government has the courage non-populist policies by dissolving state ministries, recruiting civil servants, undertaking privatization, and gradually a bureaucratic culture that tends not to be innovative. Every change in Japan is preceded by an institutional order that is responsible for a particular problem and is ad-hoc (temporary). This shows that how Japan is controlled for certain problems by having targets that must be resolved. Realizing that political support is inevitable and even a necessity in implementing administrative reform in Japan.
This research examined the strategy and process of administrative reform in South Korea. The method was using a descriptive qualitative approach with analysis of literature study from secondary data. The results showed that there were six strategies in South Korea administrative reform, i.e.: (1) downsizing; (2) deregulations; (3) reorganization; (4) administrative efficacy; (5) debureaucratization; and (6) decentralization. Downsizing was applied to shrink government institutions in every regime. Deregulations was applied through business privatization and economic liberalization to escape from economic crisis. Reorganization was applied by merging several government institutions to improve the communication process and public service. Administrative efficacy was applied through utilizing and improving e-government in public service. Debureaucratization was applied toward civil servants to promote professional and competent bureaucrats. Decentralization was applied to shorten the decision making process and create contextual local-government policy.
Focus of this research was to describe of talent management in public sector, especially influencing factors, challenges, and strategies. This research applied descriptive qualitative analysis by combining library research and examining secondary data. There were four factors that played as influence, challenge, and strategy in talent management implementation for public sector, i.e. (1) cultural, (2) human resource, (3) managerial/structural, and 4) environmental. Cultural factor included making sustainable talent management. Human resource included capability, passion, and program performance measurement. Managerial factor included leadership, organizational commitment, and activists were needed in implementing TM consistently. Environmental factor included regulation, budget, and political support on the national scale.
This paper seeks to explain the administration and leadership reform strategy. Administrative reform and leadership are two things that are interrelated and inseparable. Leadership in government requires administrative reform to increase the legitimacy of its government. On the other hand, administrative reform requires commitment and consistency of leadership to ensure its success goals are achieved. Administrative reform is something that is ongoing and sustainable, but without the right administrative reform strategy it is clearly difficult to get the desired results. In other words, the right strategy will determine the success of the implementation of administrative reform. Especially if the implementation of this administrative reform is supported by the commitment of the national leadership all out.
Penelitian ini diarahkan untuk menggambarkan proses reformasi kepegawaian pada suatu negara, dengan menemukan faktor determinan dalam melakukan tranformasi dan pengembangan sistem kepegawaian sebuah negara. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan ialah analisis deskriptif kualitatif dengan mengkombinasikan penelitian kepustakaan dan menelaah data sekunder sebagai metode pengumpulan data. Hasilnya menunjukan bahwa terdapat empat faktor determinan dalam keberhasilan China mereformasi sistem kepegawaiannya yaitu: faktor politik, hukum, birokrasi, dan ekonomi. Sementara itu pembelajaran baik yang dapat diadopsi dari setiap faktor ialah (1) faktor politik seperti komitmen, konsistensi, dan kapasitas pimpinan (2) faktor hukum seperti; penciptaan aturan main, pengawasan, dan penciptaan stabilitas, (3) faktor birokrasi seperti: profesionalitas, penerapan system merit, dan peningkatan kesejahteraan, dan (4) faktor ekonomi seperti: pemilihan kebijakan yang pragmatis dan pembangunan ekonomi yang mendorong investasi
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.