Background: Leprosy continues to be a predominant public health problem in India despite rapid strides made for its prevention, detection and treatment since ages. As leprosy can occur in any form due to immunological status of the patient, its clinico-pathological correlation gains more importance. Aim: The present research was undertaken to ascertain the importance of skin biopsy in detecting and diagnosing difficult cases where clinical diagnosis alone is not sufficient and a clinico-pathological correlation study in leprosy assumes greater significance. Method: This was a hospital based prospective study conducted in 60 cases of clinically diagnosed, newly untreated or suspected cases of leprosy for two years among patients attending OPD Department of Dermatology and whose skin biopsies were processed in the department of Pathology with Haematoxylin & Eosin stain along with special stain (Fite Faraco) to ascertain clinico-pathological correlation in leprosy cases. Results: A total of 60 cases were studied. Out of them 71.7% were males and 28.3% females. Majority of them 31.7% belonged to the age group of 21-30 years and children were least affected. Clinico-histopathological classification concordance was noted maximum in LL (80%) followed by BT (77.2%), TT (76.4%), BL (75%), BB (71.4%) and least in IL (60%). Overall concordance between clinical and histopathological diagnosis observed in our study was 75%. Conclusion: Diagnosing and treating leprosy solely on clinical basis still poses a problem while histopathology helps in making a definite diagnosis. This study shows a good correlation among clinical and histopathological findings in skin biopsy.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

A case of Bullosis diabeticorum (BD) affecting unusual sites involving anterior abdominal wall and axilla in a female with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) without antecedent trauma and drug intake is being reported for its rarity. Dermatologists must be made aware of this under diagnosed possibility in diabetes whose status is unknown after considering direct immunoflurescence studies to exclude other similar histological and immunological entities.

No abstract

Background: The aim of the present study was to determine the pattern of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported at ADR monitoring centre (AMC) in Punjab. Methods: This observational retrospective study was done in department of Pharmacology, GGS Medical College and Hospital, Faridkot from September 2020 to August 2021. A total of 148 ADRs were reported during the study period. Each ADR was analyzed for demographic data and characteristics of ADR. Assessment of causality, severity and preventability was done according to WHO UMC scale, modified Hartwig and Siegel scale and Modified Schumock and Thornton Preventability Scale respectively. Results: A total of 148 ADRs were reported from both outpatients and in patients of various departments. Most of the ADRs were found in males (55%) and patients of age group 31-45 years (33%). Majority of ADRs were reported from dermatology department (40%). Overall, 38% of ADRs were due to antimicrobial drugs. Most of the ADRs were reported as possible (57%), followed by probable (41%) as per WHO causality assessment. Most of the ADRs were moderate severity (83%). 97% of the ADRs were found to be definitely preventable type. Conclusions: We concluded that most of the ADRs were reported from antimicrobial drugs, so it is advisable to have close monitoring of the antimicrobial drug therapy to prevent ADRs in the patients. Although the majority of ADRs were moderate in nature but mostly were recovered. The study of ADRs in a particular institute using demographic patterns will contribute to patient safety by sensitizing the clinicians in that particular institute.

Background: Adverse drug reactions are important causes of mortality and morbidity in the patients. Early detection, evaluation and monitoring of ADRs is essential to improve public health. Methods: This was an observational, non-interventional and retrospective study conducted at the ADR monitoring centre of a tertiary care hospital of North India. Suspected ADR forms reported over a period of 4 years involving at least one chemotherapeutic drug with at least one dose were analyzed. Results: A total of 261 chemotherapeutic drugs associated ADRs were analyzed. Out of these, maximum numbers of ADRs were reported by males (54%). Maximum reporting was done by Skin and VD department (37.93%). Causality assessment was probable in maximum number of cases (54%). Most common ADRs were skin rashes (21.46%), followed by jaundice, urticaria and fixed drug eruptions. Maximum ADRs were suspected to be caused by Anti tubercular drugs (31.42%) followed by anticancer drugs (14.56%). Conclusions: ADRs due to antibiotics and anticancer drugs is a significant health problem.