BackgroundHeat stress adversely affects the physiological and metabolic status, and the productive performance of buffalo.MethodsThe present study was conducted to explicate the effect of misting and wallowing cooling strategies during heat stress in lactating Murrah buffalo. The study was conducted for three months (May–July) of which first two months were hot dry and last month was hot humid. Eighteen lactating buffaloes, offered the same basal diet, were blocked by days in milk, milk yield and parity, and then randomly allocated to three treatments: negative control (no cooling), cooling by misting, and cooling by wallowing.ResultsThe results showed higher (P < 0.05) milk yield in buffaloes of misting and wallowing group compared to control during the experimental period however wallowing was found more (P < 0.05) effective during July (hot humid period). Both the treatments resulted into significant (P < 0.05) reduction in rectal temperature (RT) and respiratory rate (RR) compared to control animals during study period whereas wallowing was found to be effective on pulse rate (PR) only during July. Both treatments were resulted in mitigating the heat stress mediated decrease in packed cell volume (PCV), lymphocytopnoea and neutrophilia whereas decrease in total erythrocyte count (TEC) and monocytes was only mitigated by wallowing. Heat load induced alteration in serum creatinine and sodium concentration was significantly (P < 0.05) ameliorated by misting and wallowing whereas aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase and superoxide dismutase activity, and reactive oxygen species concentration could be normalized neither by misting nor by wallowing. The significant (P < 0.05) increment in serum cortisol and prolactin levels observed in June and July period in control animals was significantly (P < 0.05) prevented by misting and wallowing.ConclusionsIt can be concluded that misting and wallowing were equally effective in May and June (hot dry period) whereas wallowing was more effective during hot humid period in preventing a decline in milk production and maintaining physiological, metabolic, endocrine and redox homeostasis.
Background and AimIn the recent past,few studies have been carried out in chicken to assess the effect of Azolla meal and raw Azolla feeding on the performance of chicken. If turkeys effectively use unconventional feedstuffs like Azolla without reducing the performance, it will increase the profitability of turkey business. Hence, a study was carried out to evaluate the effect of dried Azolla pinnata vis-a-vis raw Azolla as choice feeding on the growth, feed conversion ratio (FCR), blood biochemical attributes, and immune competence traits of growing turkeys under intensive system.Materials and MethodsA total of 72, 8-week-old grower turkey poults of black variety were randomly distributed into three dietary treatments having three replicates each with eight birds. The birds of the control group (T1) were fed a basal diet (CP - 19.71% and ME - 2789.79 Kcal/kg), while the other group (T2) and choice-feeding group (T3) were fed 5% of basal diet replaced by dry Azolla powder on DM basis and ad libitumAzolla along with basal diet, respectively.ResultsThere was no significant difference among the different groups in the average weekly weight gain during the entire experiment. FCR was significantly better (p<0.05) in the choice-feeding group compared to the other two experimental groups during 8-16 weeks of age. There was no significant difference among the treatment groups in any of the blood biochemical indices except plasma uric acid, which was significantly decreased (p<0.01) in T2 compared to T1 at 16 weeks of age. HA and IgM response to 1% sheep red blood cells (log2 titer) were numerically better in T2 and T3 compared to the T1.ConclusionThus, it may be inferred that choice feeding with Azolla, and basal diet may improve FCR without any adverse effect on blood biochemical attributes and immune competence traits.
The present experiment was undertaken to study the effect of misting and splashing during hot-dry and hothumid months in lactating Sahiwal cattle. The study was conducted during May, June (hot-dry) and July (hothumid) with monthly average temperature-humidity index (THI) of 79.88, 80.57 and 85.36, respectively. Eighteen lactating cattle were selected on the basis of days in milk, milk yield, and parity and then divided into three groups: control (no cooling), cooling by misting and cooling by splashing. Milk production was not affected by hot-dry and hot-humid heat stress in Sahiwal cattle. RT and RR were significantly lower in misting and splashing group as compared to control during hot-dry period. The heat stress-induced leucocytosis, lymphocytopenia and neutrophilia were significantly ameliorated by both misting and splashing during the study period. Heat stress-induced alterations in serum creatinine, sodium and ROS concentration were significantly mitigated by misting in hot-humid climate. The prolactin level significantly decreased in animals by misting during the study period. The results suggested that misting was more efficient than splashing as a cooling strategy in hot dry condition while splashing was more effective in hot-humid condition and mitigated the heat stress-induced alterations in different welfare parameters but could not fully nullify it. However, the resultant stress was not sufficient enough to decrease the milk yield in Sahiwal cattle. It may also be concluded that the Sahiwal cattle have high heat tolerance and could sustain production even in a hot-dry and hot-humid environment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.