Background: Vulval dermatoses may present with varied manifestations ranging from asymptomatic to chronic disabling conditions. The multifactorial nature of symptoms and physical expression of the disease on the vulva complicate the evaluation and management of genital dermatoses, thereby severely impairing the quality of life of patients. Objectives: To study the clinical patterns and socio-demographic features of vulval dermatoses and their impact on the quality of life using the dermatology life quality index (DLQI) questionnaire. Materials and Methods: Female patients of all age groups who attended our outpatient department (OPD) from October 2019 to March 2021 with vulval lesions were included in the study after a detailed history and complete examination. Based on sites of involvement, the lesions were classified as genital lesions alone, genital and skin lesions, oro-genital lesions, and oro-genital and skin lesions. DLQI score was assessed using the DLQI questionnaire. Results: In total, 520 patients were recruited for the study after following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The most common age group was 31–40 years (33.65%). The majority of the patients were married (91.92%), housewives (82.88%), and illiterate (49.61%) women. The most common presenting symptom was itching (43%). The most common vulval dermatoses were infections, seen in 401 (77.11%) patients, followed by inflammatory diseases in 78 (15%) patients, and immunobullous diseases (1.53%). Patients with genital, skin, and oral involvement showed statistically significant higher DLQI scores ( P value < 0.05). Patients with immunobullous disorders had the highest mean DLQI scores. Limitations: As this study was a hospital-based study, the observations may not represent and reflect the general population. Conclusion: Patients with genital, skin, and oral lesions had the highest DLQI scores, indicating higher impact on the quality of life. Assessment of the disease’s impact on the quality of life is essential because it not only aids in early management but also helps in minimizing the duration of the ailment.

Background: Periorbital melanosis (POM) describes the light-to-dark-colored, brownish-black pigmentation surrounding the eyelids. It can affect an individual’s quality of life. Dermoscopic features of POM are not frequently reported in the literature. Materials and Methods: This study comprised 100 patients aged above 16 years, who attended our outpatient department (OPD) from November 2018 to October 2019. A detailed history, clinical features, and the dermoscopic study of color, pattern of pigment, and pattern of the blood vessel were recorded with the Dermlite-3N dermoscope (3Gen, San Juan Capistrano, California). On the basis of the eyelids’ pigmentation and involvement, patients were clinically graded as Grade 0 to 4, with 4 being deep dark color extending beyond the infraorbital fold. The clinical patterns and the dermoscopic features were correlated. Results: Most patients were women (76) and the common age group was 16–25 years. Most of the patients had both the eyelids involved (58%), followed by lower eyelids (28%). The majority of the patients were having POM of grade 2 (47%). Seventeen patients (17%) had a positive family history of POM. The most common clinical form of POM observed was constitutional type (77) followed by postinflammatory type (12). Of 100 patients, 52 had pigmentary, 15 had vascular, and 33 had mixed pigmentary-vascular pattern. Cell phone usage (>4 h) and refractory errors (38% each) were the common risk factors observed. Stress and respiratory allergy were significantly associated. In the pigmentation patterns, epidermal (54%), dermal (14%), and mixed (17%) subsets were observed. The reticular pattern was the most common vascular pattern (65%). Conclusion: POM is a multifactorial entity. Multiple risk factors play a role in the pathogenesis and aggravation. Clinical forms did not show any specific dermoscopic patterns. Dermoscopy of POM helps to know the underlying pathology, which in turn paves the way to the effective treatment.

Gouty tophi present themselves as firm and skincolored or yellowish papules or nodules with white chalky material. They may appear in any location on the body, but appear most commonly in the interphalangeal joints [1]. Clinically, they may resemble calcinosis cutis, rheumatoid nodules, xanthomas, and panniculitis. They indicate a chronic foreign-body granulomatous response to monosodium urate crystal deposits in the dermis and the subcutaneous tissue, and classically occur with untreated chronic gouty arthritis. Very rarely, in the absence of arthritis, they may be the first clinical sign of gout, which is known as gout nodulosis [2].

Background Histopathological examination of skin remains the cornerstone in the diagnosis of leprosy. At a few centers, fluorescent microscopy has been found to be useful in detecting more acid-fast bacilli (AFB) compared to modified Fite-Faraco staining but is sparsely documented. Hence, we studied the sensitivity of fluorescent microscopy and modified Fite-Faraco stain in the detection of Mycobacterium leprae in tissue sections.Methods Patients attending our outpatient department during January 2019 to June 2020 with the clinical features of leprosy were examined, and the diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology after informed consent. Tissue sections were stained by fluorescent stain and modified Fite-Faraco stain. Bacillary index was calculated for each case. Results Forty patients were recruited after following the inclusion and exclusion criteria.AFB were demonstrated in 20 patients by modified Fite-Faraco stain and in 27 patients with fluorescent stain. The sensitivity of fluorescent staining method (67.5%) was higher than modified Fite-Faraco stain (50%). Bacillary index was increased in 26 out of 40 cases by the fluorescent staining compared to the modified Fite-Faraco staining. Chi-square value was 69.3 and P value was 0.000, indicating a statistically significant correlation.Limitations Fluorescent microscope is expensive, and trained people are needed to identify the bacilli. Conclusion Fluorescent staining is more sensitive than modified Fite-Faraco staining in the detection of AFB in tissue sections. The bacilli detected per field were high with the fluorescent staining compared to the modified Fite-Faraco method.