Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and incidence and mortality rates are increasing among young women worldwide, including Brazil. TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism (rs1042522) has been associated with breast cancer, due to its important role in cell cycle that impacts the development of cancer. Objective: To determine the magnitude of the association between TP53 Arg72Pro polymorphism and breast cancer development in young Brazilian women. Method: Hospital-based case-control study conducted in Rio de Janeiro with 268 confirmed breast cancer cases and 277 controls with women enrolled among hospitalized patients without neoplastic diseases or their companions at three public hospitals. Results: The genotype frequency was 46.57% for Arg/Pro, 35.74% for Arg/Arg, and 17.69% for Pro/Pro among healthy controls and 41.04% for Arg/Pro, 46.64% for Arg/Arg, and 12.31% for Pro/Pro among breast cancer cases. The genotypes Pro/Pro (OR=0.46; 95% CI=0.27-0.80, in comparison with Arg/Arg genotype) and Pro allele in dominant model (OR=0.65; 95% CI=0.45-0.92, in comparison with Arg/Arg genotype) were statistically associated with a protective effect for breast cancer among young Brazilian women. Also, family history of breast or ovary cancer (OR=2.18; 95% CI=1.37-3.46) and tobacco use (OR=1.74; 95% CI=1.14-2.68) were statistically associated with breast cancer. Conclusion: Further studies are necessary to confirm that Arg72Pro polymorphism can be a protective factor for breast cancer development among young women, since ethnicity can influence genotypes frequencies and the risk of developing breast cancer.

Background: Benign breast disease (BBD) is one of main breast cancer risk factors. Dysfunctions on p53 protein, which has a genome protective role, have been related to breast cancer developments. However, its role on BBD development is still unclear. Methods: A systematic review of literature was proceeded according to PRISMA-P guidelines. PubMed, BVS, MEDLINE and Scholar Google were used as databases, complemented by a manual search in articles references. Articles searches were conducted from May to July 2019 and publications in English, Spanish and Portuguese were selected. P53 expression was set as outcome among women with BBD and were included only articles with good quality according STROBE tools. Data concerning p53 expression frequencies were independently extracted by two review authors, and eligible articles were synthesized. Results: From 12 studies selected for this review, the majority analyzed p53 expression in non-proliferative lesions and general p53 expressions ranged from 0 to 100%. P53 expression was more frequently observed in cases series studies (91.7%) and in studies conducted in Occidental Europe (41.7%). P53 expression was more frequent among tissues with fibrocystic disease (22.5%) and fibroadenoma (22.5%). Conclusion: When compared with all breast tissues types, benign breast disease corresponds to 34.39% of p53 expression. Second outcomes were not evaluated because the heterogeneity observed in selected studies. In addition, more studies considering ethnicity and benign breast disease classification should also be considered for further analysis.

Background: Benign breast disease (BBD) is a factor strongly associated with breast cancer worldwide. Arg72Pro SNP association with breast cancer is controversial due to the suggestion that environmental factors are required to modulate such risk. There are no studies evaluating these environmental interactions of the aforementioned SNP within BBD. Aim: To determine the frequency of SNP Arg72Pro in a cohort of women diagnosed with BBD; and to investigate gene-environmental interactions with environmental factors. Results: The genotype frequency was 44.6% for Arg/Pro, 39.3% for Arg/Arg genotype, and 16.3% for Pro/Pro homozygote. Gene-environment interaction analysis shows that when Arg/Arg is considered as reference, there is an ORinteraction with Arg/Pro and fabric exposure (OR=1.90;95%CI:1.04,3.48), solvents (OR=2.21;95%CI:1.01,4.83) and chlorine, bleaches, disinfectants, and liquid wax exposure (OR=2.52;95%CI:1.07,5.91). Analysis with Pro/Pro genotype as the reference showed an interaction between alcohol consumption and recessive model (OR=1.58;95%CI:1.00,2.51). Gene-environmental interactions were observed too between exposure to hair dyes, straighteners or relaxers and Arg/Arg (OR=3.26;95%CI:1.21,8.82). Conclusion: The Arg/Pro genotype was the most frequent in the BBD cohort. When compared with the Arg/Arg genotype, the presence of Arg/Pro genotype and solvents, fabric and cleaning products exposure increased the risk of BBD. When compared with Pro/Pro genotype, there were interactions between recessive model with alcohol consumption and exposure to hair products on the risk of BBD.

No abstract