SUMMARY Advances in therapeutic neuromodulation devices have enabled concurrent stimulation and electrophysiology in the central nervous system. However, stimulation artifacts often obscure the sensed underlying neural activity. Here, we develop a method, termed Period-based Artifact Reconstruction and Removal Method (PARRM), to remove stimulation artifacts from neural recordings by leveraging the exact period of stimulation to construct and subtract a high-fidelity template of the artifact. Benchtop saline experiments, computational simulations, five unique in vivo paradigms across animal and human studies, and an obscured movement biomarker are used for validation. Performance is found to exceed that of state-of-the-art filters in recovering complex signals without introducing contamination. PARRM has several advantages: (1) it is superior in signal recovery; (2) it is easily adaptable to several neurostimulation paradigms; and (3) it has low complexity for future on-device implementation. Real-time artifact removal via PARRM will enable unbiased exploration and detection of neural biomarkers to enhance efficacy of closed-loop therapies.

No abstract

Objective: Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) has emerged as an approach to restore motor function following spinal cord injury (SCI). However, identifying optimal EES parameters presents a significant challenge due to the complex and stochastic nature of muscle control and the combinatorial explosion of possible parameter configurations. Here, we describe a machine-learning approach that leverages modern deep neural networks to learn bidirectional mappings between the space of permissible EES parameters and target motor outputs. Approach: We collected data from four sheep implanted with two 24-contact EES electrode arrays on the lumbosacral spinal cord. Muscle activity was recorded from four bilateral hindlimb electromyography (EMG) sensors. We introduce a general learning framework to identify EES parameters capable of generating desired patterns of EMG activity. Specifically, we first amortize spinal sensorimotor computations in a forward neural network model that learns to predict motor outputs based on EES parameters. Then, we employ a second neural network as an inverse model, which reuses the amortized knowledge learned by the forward model to guide the selection of EES parameters. Main results: We found that neural networks can functionally approximate spinal sensorimotor computations by accurately predicting EMG outputs based on EES parameters. The generalization capability of the forward model critically benefited our inverse model. We successfully identified novel EES parameters, in under 20 minutes, capable of producing desired target EMG recruitment during in vivo testing. Furthermore, we discovered potential functional redundancies within the spinal sensorimotor networks by identifying unique EES parameters that result in similar motor outcomes. Together, these results suggest that our framework is well-suited to probe spinal circuitry and control muscle recruitment in a completely data-driven manner. Significance: We successfully identify novel EES parameters within minutes, capable of producing desired EMG recruitment. Our approach is data-driven, subject-agnostic, automated, and orders of magnitude faster than manual approaches.

Intracortical somatosensory interfaces have now entered the clinical domain. Darie et al. explore the implications of research published in Science Translational Medicine by Flesher et al. (2016), discuss how to design such a system given current technology, and question how to effectively communicate with users about their experience.

No abstract

Advances in therapeutic neuromodulation devices have enabled concurrent stimulation and electrophysiology in the central nervous system. However, stimulation artifacts often obscure the sensed underlying neural activity. Here, we develop a method, termed Period-based Artifact Reconstruction and Removal Method (PARRM), to remove stimulation artifacts from neural recordings by leveraging the exact period of stimulation to construct and subtract a high-fidelity template of the artifact. Benchtop saline experiments, computational simulations, five unique in vivo paradigms across animal and human studies, and an obscured movement biomarker are used for validation. Performance is found to exceed that of state-of-the-art filters in recovering complex signals without introducing contamination. PARRM has several advantages: (1) it is superior in signal recovery; (2) it is easily adaptable to several neurostimulation paradigms; and (3) it has low complexity for future on-device implementation. Real-time artifact removal via PARRM will enable unbiased exploration and detection of neural biomarkers to enhance efficacy of closed-loop therapies. In briefDastin-van Rijn and Provenza et al. developed the Period-based Artifact Reconstruction and Removal Method (PARRM) to remove stimulation artifacts from electrophysiological recordings. PARRM is superior to comparable methods, adaptable to several neurostimulation paradigms, and of low complexity for future on-device implementation. These features make PARRM effective for identifying neural biomarkers for closed-loop therapies.

No abstract