Maraknya penangkapan akhir-akhir ini yang dilakukan oleh KPK yang dikenal dengan istilah Operasi Tangkap Tangan atau OTT memunculkan polemik apakah sah atau tidak sah. Pihak-pihak yang menganggap bahwa OTT adalah ilegal mendasarkan pada argumentasi bahwa tidak adanya istilah Operasi Tangkap Tangan dalam KUHAP, yang ada hanyalah Tertangkap Tangan.Perbedaan tersebut kemudian disimpulkan bahwa OTT adalah illegal.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan OTT Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Terhadap Gubernur Aceh dalam kaitannya dengan istilah Tertangkap Tangan dalam KUHAP dan OTT dalam kaitannya dengan teknik penyidikan khusus yang dikenal dengan istilah Controlled Delivery. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif (yuridis normatif) dengan melakukan studi bahan kepustakaan guna mengumpulkan data sekunder. Penelitian hukum normatif dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka (kepustakaan) yang merupakan data sekunder. Dari analisis yang dapat dipahami maka OTT Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi terhadap Gubernur Aceh dalam kaitannya dengan istilah tertangkap tangan dalam KUHAP bahwa Pasal 111 ayat (1) KUHAP dan Pasal 1 butir 19 KUHAP diatas dasar hukum bagi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam melakukan Operasi Tangkap Tangan (OTT) yang dianggap illegal serta memandang bahwa Operasi Tangkap Tangan berbeda dengan Tertangkap Tangan yang terdapat pada pasal-pasal tersebut. Kemudian OTT dalam kaitannya dengan teknik penyidikan khusus yang dikenal dengan istilah Controlled Delivery sering digunakan oleh penyidik BNN, menilai bahwa praktik KPK dalam OTT telah menggunakan dua tindakan tersebut (interdiction and entrapment) yang berarti penyidik KPK telah mengadopsi tanpa kewenangan yang telah dimiliki penyidik BNN, sehingga KPK telah melakukan tiga jenis tindakan yang melanggar UU (interdiction, entrapment dan dalam proses penyelidikan). Rampant catching lately done by KPK is known by the term Operation Catch hand or OTT gave rise to polemic whether legitimate or illegitimate. Parties who consider that OTT is illegal basing on arguing that the absence of a Capture Operation term of hands in the code of criminal procedure, only Caught hand. The difference is then inferred that OTT is illegal. This research aims to clarify OTT corruption eradication Commission Against the Governor of Aceh in relation to the term caught on hand in the code of criminal procedure and OTT in relation to special investigation techniques that are known with the term Controlled Delivery. Research methods the research methods used are normative legal (juridical normative) and conduct studies of materials libraries in order to collect data on the secondary. Normative legal research done by researching library materials (library) which is a secondary data. From the analysis that can be understood then the OTT corruption eradication Commission against the Governor of Aceh in relation to the term caught on hand in the code of criminal procedure that Article 111 paragraph (1) of the code of criminal procedure and the code of criminal procedure article 1 19 rounds above the legal basis for the The corruption eradication Commission in conducting Operation Catch hands (OTT) that are considered illegal and looked at that Capture different Hand Operation with Hand Caught on the articles. Then OTT in relation to special investigation techniques that are known by the term Controlled Delivery is often used by BNN, the investigators argued that the practice of KPK in the OTT has been using these two acts (interdiction and entrapment) which means investigators KPK has been adopted without the authority that has been owned by the investigator so that the KPK, BNN has conducted three types of actions that violate the ACT (entrapment, interdiction and investigation in the process).
This study aims to identify the legal analysis of the burning of a Sector Police Office by the community from a criminological perspective as well as to analyze the level of community trust in police after the burning of the Sector Police Office based on criminological theories. This descriptive-analytical study applied a normative juridical approach. The results of the legal analysis of the burning of a Sector Police Office by the community from a criminological perspective showed that, according to the anomic theory, the burning is due to the influence of social structure as a correlative factor in the burning of the Sector Police Office of Bendahara. This influence can be seen from the disparity between the goals to be achieved and the means used in achieving these goals. Hence, the community took steps to burn down the Sector Police Office to achieve its goals. Further, the level of community trust in police after the burning of the Sector Police Office was demonstrated through association theory, social control theory, and neutralization theory. Based on the description of the criminological theories and its relation to the phenomenon of the burning of the Sector Police Office of Bendahara, there needs to be an evaluation of the application of the law as the harmonization of the law in the context of criminal provisions is needed.�Pembakaran Kepolisian Sektor oleh Masyarakat dalam Perspektif Kriminologi�Tujuan penelitian ini yaitu untuk mengetahui analisis hukum terhadap pembakaran Kepolisian Sektor oleh masyarakat dalam perspektif kriminologi, untuk mengetahui kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap kepolisian pasca pembakaran Kepolisian Sektor menurut teori-teori kriminologi. Spesifikasi penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian bersifat deskriptif-analitis dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian dari analisis hukum terhadap pembakaran Kepolisian Sektor oleh masyarakat dalam kriminologi bahwa menurut teori anomi menekankan pengaruh struktur sosial sebagai faktor korelatif terjadinya pembakaran Kepolisian Sektor Bendahara. Pengaruh ini terlihat dari adanya disparitas antara tujuan yang hendak dicapai dengan sarana yang digunakan dalam mencapai tujuan tersebut. Hal ini akhirnya mengambil langkah-langkah pembakaran Kepolisian Sektor Bendahara untuk mencapai tujuannya. Selanjutnya tingkat kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap kepolisian pasca pembakaran Kepolisian Sektor menunjukkan melalui teori asosiasi; teori kontrol social dan teori netralisasi. Berdasarkan uraian teori-teori kriminologi tersebut dihubungkan fenomena pembakaran Kepolisian Sektor Bendahara saat ini sangatlah dibutuhkan sebagai evaluasi terhadap penerapan hukum sehingga diperlukan harmonisasi hukum dalam konteks ketentuan pidana
Medical record is a file that contains records and documents about the patient's identity, examination, treatment, actions and other services that have been provided to patients. This study aims to determine the legal arrangements regarding the medical record, to find out law enforcement against the Public Relations of Langsa Public Hospital publish patient medical records in online media and to find out the obstacles and efforts made in law enforcement against the Public Relations of Langsa Public Hospital that open patient medical records. The method used in this study is normative and empirical juridical. 1) In medicine, it is not permissible for a doctor or employee of a public hospital to open a medical record through the Public Relations media of Langsa Regional Hospital according to Law Number 29 of 2004 Article 51. 2) Law enforcement against someone who opens a medical record at Langsa Regional Hospital is considered ineffective because law enforcement officials in this case are not serious in handling cases that should be prosecuted. 3) Obstacles in law enforcement in Langsa Regional Hospital, namely that there are still overlapping laws by the police so that law enforcement cannot be carried out fairly and the efforts made in law enforcement against Langsa Regional Hospital that open medical records by means of supervision and coordination between leadership and staff in hospitals Langsa.Keywords: Law Enforcement, Medical Records, Media
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.