Legalitas Operasi Tangkap Tangan (OTT) Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Terhadap Gubernur Aceh

Abstract

Maraknya penangkapan akhir-akhir ini yang dilakukan oleh KPK yang dikenal dengan istilah Operasi Tangkap Tangan atau OTT memunculkan polemik apakah sah atau tidak sah. Pihak-pihak yang menganggap bahwa OTT adalah ilegal mendasarkan pada argumentasi bahwa tidak adanya istilah Operasi Tangkap Tangan dalam KUHAP, yang ada hanyalah Tertangkap Tangan.Perbedaan tersebut kemudian disimpulkan bahwa OTT adalah illegal.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan OTT Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Terhadap Gubernur Aceh dalam kaitannya dengan istilah Tertangkap Tangan dalam KUHAP dan OTT dalam kaitannya dengan teknik penyidikan khusus yang dikenal dengan istilah Controlled Delivery. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif (yuridis normatif) dengan melakukan studi bahan kepustakaan guna mengumpulkan data sekunder. Penelitian hukum normatif dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka (kepustakaan) yang merupakan data sekunder. Dari analisis yang dapat dipahami maka OTT Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi terhadap Gubernur Aceh dalam kaitannya dengan istilah tertangkap tangan dalam KUHAP bahwa Pasal 111 ayat (1) KUHAP dan Pasal 1 butir 19 KUHAP diatas dasar hukum bagi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam melakukan Operasi Tangkap Tangan (OTT) yang dianggap illegal serta memandang bahwa Operasi Tangkap Tangan berbeda dengan Tertangkap Tangan yang terdapat pada pasal-pasal tersebut. Kemudian OTT dalam kaitannya dengan teknik penyidikan khusus yang dikenal dengan istilah Controlled Delivery sering digunakan oleh penyidik BNN, menilai bahwa praktik KPK dalam OTT telah menggunakan dua tindakan tersebut (interdiction and entrapment) yang berarti penyidik KPK telah mengadopsi tanpa kewenangan yang telah dimiliki penyidik BNN, sehingga KPK telah melakukan tiga jenis tindakan yang melanggar UU (interdiction, entrapment dan dalam proses penyelidikan). Rampant catching lately done by KPK is known by the term Operation Catch hand or OTT gave rise to polemic whether legitimate or illegitimate. Parties who consider that OTT is illegal basing on arguing that the absence of a Capture Operation term of hands in the code of criminal procedure, only Caught hand. The difference is then inferred that OTT is illegal. This research aims to clarify OTT corruption eradication Commission Against the Governor of Aceh in relation to the term caught on hand in the code of criminal procedure and OTT in relation to special investigation techniques that are known with the term Controlled Delivery. Research methods the research methods used are normative legal (juridical normative) and conduct studies of materials libraries in order to collect data on the secondary. Normative legal research done by researching library materials (library) which is a secondary data. From the analysis that can be understood then the OTT corruption eradication Commission against the Governor of Aceh in relation to the term caught on hand in the code of criminal procedure that Article 111 paragraph (1) of the code of criminal procedure and the code of criminal procedure article 1 19 rounds above the legal basis for the The corruption eradication Commission in conducting Operation Catch hands (OTT) that are considered illegal and looked at that Capture different Hand Operation with Hand Caught on the articles. Then OTT in relation to special investigation techniques that are known by the term Controlled Delivery is often used by BNN, the investigators argued that the practice of KPK in the OTT has been using these two acts (interdiction and entrapment) which means investigators KPK has been adopted without the authority that has been owned by the investigator so that the KPK, BNN has conducted three types of actions that violate the ACT (entrapment, interdiction and investigation in the process).

The Status of Hand Arrest Operations in the View of Legal Practitioners

“…The recent rise in arrests carried out by the KPK, known as Operation Catching Hands or OTT, has raised a polemic as to whether it is legal or illegal. This discourse arose from the intensity of DPR member Fahri Hamzah taking issue with the OTT KPK on his Twitter (Ramadhani et al, 2018).…”

“…The Hand Arrest Operation carried out by the KPK is often associated with Article 18 of the Criminal Code, which regulates being caught hand Arrest (Simanjuntak, 2019). However, in its implementation, the article that regulates hand Arrest has a different procedure from the Hand Arrest operation carried out by the KPK (Ramadhani et al, 2018). However, a significant difference exists between Hand Arrest and being Arrested.…”

“…Being Hand Arrest in Article 1, paragraph 19 of the Criminal Code is the Arrest of a person at the time of committing a crime, or immediately after a while the crime committed, or a moment later being called out by the general public as the person who committed it, or if a moment later objects suspected of being found in him violence has been used to commit the crime which shows that he is the perpetrator or participated in or helped commit the crime (Ramadhani et al, 2018;Wattie, 2015). It happened accidentally discovered by investigators without planning to arrest the perpetrators of corruption, while the Hand Arrest Operation (OTT) is one of the efforts to handle corruption cases (Hikmawati, 2018).…”

Corruption Crime Eradication by Corruption Eradication Commission Through Red-handed Catch Operation on Bribery Action

“…According to the writer's opinion, OTT executed by KPK is not the same as caught red-handed outlined in KUHAP because the OTT is preceded by investigation and tapping operation activity, to collect pieces of evidence on a person who allegedly will commit a crime, and then catch is executed, so that a potential crime has been known, in this case, when and where. Accordingly, the OTT cannot be categorized as a red-handed catch as referred to in Article 1 paragraph 19 of KUHAP, but more accurately called operation or inquiry for a catch or operation to collect shreds of evidence for net (Ramadhani et al, 2018).…”

Comparative Study Mekanisme Penyadapan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia dan Inggris

“…Ramadhani, W., Iskandar, S., & Radhali, R. (2018). Legalitas Operasi Tangkap Tangan (OTT) Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Terhadap Gubernur Aceh.Transaksi Elektronik, dinyatakan bahwa penyadapan diperbolehkan dalam rangka penegakan hukum atas permintaan kepolisian, kejaksaan, dan/atau institusi penegak hukum lainnya yang ditetapkan berdasarkan undang-undang.…”