What words we use, and what meanings they have, is important. We shouldn’t use slurs; we should use ‘rape’ to include spousal rape (for centuries we didn’t); we should have a word which picks out the sexual harassment suffered by people in the workplace and elsewhere (for centuries we didn’t). Sometimes we need to change the word-meaning pairs in circulation, either by getting rid of the pair completely (slurs), changing the meaning (as we did with ‘rape’), or adding brand new word-meaning pairs (as with ‘sexual harassment’). A problem, though, is how to do this. One might worry that any attempt to change language in this way will lead to widespread miscommunication and confusion. I argue that this is indeed so, but that’s a feature, not a bug, of attempting to change word-meaning pairs. The miscommunications and confusion such changes cause can lead us, via a process I call transformative communicative disruption, to reflect on our language and its use, and this can further, rather than hinder, our goal of improving language.
This article discusses recent theories of the meaning of generics. The discussion is centred on how the theories differ in their approach to addressing the primary difficulty in providing a theory of generic meaning: The notoriously complex ways in which the truth conditions of generics seem to vary. In addition, the article summarizes considerations for and against each theory.
Leslie (a, ) has recently offered a novel and innovative theory of generics which is already receiving much attention. Theorists are compelled by Leslie's treatment of so-called troublesome generics, like:() Mosquitoes carry the West Nile virus.() Books are paperbacks.() Birds lay eggs.() is intuitively true despite the fact that only very few mosquitoes (less than %) carry the West Nile virus, while () is false even though the vast majority of books have paper covers. Still further, () is true despite the fact that it is only non-sterile female birds of reproductive age that lay eggs.These kinds of cases make it hard to specify truth-conditions for generics in terms of some stable quantificational criteria: On the one hand, if we take seriously the number of mosquitoes required to make () come out as true, then it seems like () is existentially quantified. (), on the other hand, appears to be universally quantified: It seems like we need a quantity even greater than a majority to guarantee its falsity. At the same time, () doesn't pattern with either () or (): () seems akin to a most-claim. These generics, then, give the appearance that it is very difficult to specify truth-conditions for generics in terms of some stable quantificational criteria.According to Leslie, this is evidence that the generalisations expressed by generics are more cognitively primitive than those expressed by quantified sentences. The "quirky" * Acknowledgments: This paper has benefited from discussions with
In response to Habgood-Coote (2019. "Stop Talking about Fake News!" Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 62 (9-10): 1033-1065.) and a growing number of scholars who argue that academics and journalists should stop talking about fake news and abandon the term, we argue that the reasons which have been offered for eschewing the term 'fake news' are not sufficient to justify such abandonment. Prima facie, then, we take ourselves and others to be justified in continuing to talk about fake news.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.