Implantation of the Talent endograft device is a safe and effective alternative to open surgery for exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysm. In comparison with first-generation grafts, the device showed superior durability for as long as 5 to 7 years after implantation. Even if prototypes of the Talent device were implanted in this study, the graft was also successfully used in most patients, even in those with adverse anatomy. Because improvements of the endograft have been made to address connecting bar breaks, a lower incidence of graft limb occlusion can be expected in the future.
the feasibility of endoluminal repair of the ruptured aorta has been demonstrated. Endoluminal treatment may reduce morbidity and mortality, and may in time become the procedure of choice in certain centres. However, further follow-up is required to determine the long-term efficacy.
Based on this small experience, nearly 1 in 5 patients may experience some degree of intraluminal thrombus following endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms. Whether the deposition of thrombus is influenced by the geometry of the aortic stent-graft or by flow conditions within the prosthetic lumen must be determined in future studies.
The endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic aneurysms appears to be safe and effective, with lower morbidity and mortality than in conventional open operations. For these reasons, endovascular treatment should be administered whenever possible.
only complete occlusion of endoleaks results in decrease in the size of the aneurysm sac. Because of endotension and the risk of rupture we favour an early interventional treatment of type II endoleaks.
Our experience shows excellent results in emergency patients with ruptured AAAs treated with endovascular surgery. In order to verify these promising results, a broader-scale clinical study must be conducted.
The postimplantation syndrome (PIS) is a weakly defined condition that has been observed following endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms; the postulated criteria include significant leukocytosis, fever, and/or coagulation disturbances. Among the factors that are supposed to contribute to this syndrome are contact activation by the stent covering with consecutive endothelial activation. Associated clinical parameters of a PIS were perioperatively monitored in the postoperative phase in a total of 69 patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysms treated with Y-stent grafts. C-reactive protein (CRP)-levels, leukocyte concentrations, and body temperature curves were directly compared to those of 50 patients undergoing conventional transperitoneal aneurysm resection. A subgroup of 10 patients of the endovascular group was compared with 13 operated-on patients with regard to an ischemia-reperfusion syndrome of the lower extremities. The mediator determinations were performed on venous (femoral vein) as well as in systemic (arterial) blood samples. The incidence of temperature values above 38 degrees C was higher in patients following endovascular treatment (72%) compared to conventionally operated-on patients (28%). CRP levels were not significantly different within the first 8 post-operative days. During open surgery, significantly higher values for lactate and lower pH levels were observed (p<0.01), as well as higher 6 keto prostaglandin F1alpha (PGF1alpha) levels. There was a short peak of PGF1alpha during eventeration of the intestine during the operative procedure that could not be detected during endovascular manipulations. The clinical and biochemical parameters do not prove the presence of a PIS following endovascular treatment of aortic aneurysms. In contrast, during open surgery the unspecific inflammatory reaction is higher, but not long-lasting. In the future, the suggested phenomenon of a decreased antiinflammatory cytokine response during endovascular surgery needs to be further examined.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.