Abstract. We investigate the role of background ionization, associated mainly with galactic cosmic radiation, in the generation and evolution of ultrafine particles in the marine boundary layer. We follow the entire course of aerosol evolution, from the initial buildup of molecular clusters (charged and uncharged) through their growth into stable nanoparticles. The model used for this purpose is based on a unified collisional (kinetic) mechanism that treats the interactions between vapors, neutral and charged clusters, and particles at all sizes. We show that air ions are likely to play a central role in the formation of new ultrafine particles. The nucleation of aerosols under atmospheric conditions involves a series of competing processes, including molecular aggregation, evaporation, and scavenging by preexisting particles. In this highly sensitive nonlinear system, electrically charged embryos have a competitive advantage over similar neutral embryos. The charged clusters experience enhanced growth and stability as a consequence of electrostatic interactions. Simulations of a major nucleation event observed during the Pacific Exploratory Mission (PEM) Tropics-A can explain most of the observed features in the ultrafine particle behavior. The key parameters controlling this behavior are the concentrations of precursor vapors and the surface area of preexisting particles, as well as the background ionization rate. We find that systematic variations in ionization levels due to the modulation of galactic cosmic radiation by the solar cycle are sufficient to cause a notable variation in aerosol production. This effect is greatest when the ambient nucleation rate is limited principally by the availability of ions. Hence we conclude that the greatest influence of such ionization is likely to occur in and above the marine boundary layer. While a systematic change in the ultrafine particle production rate is likely to affect the population of cloud condensation nuclei and hence cloud optical properties, the magnitude of the effect cannot be directly inferred from the present analysis, and requires additiorial analysis based on specific aerosol-cloud interactions.
We review the major impact-associated mechanisms proposed to cause extinctions at the Cretaceous-Tertiary geological boundary. We then discuss how the proposed extinction mechanisms may relate to the environmental consequences of asteroid and comet impacts in general. Our chief goal is to provide relatively simple prescriptions for evaluating the importance of impacting objects over a range of energies and compositions, but we also stress that there are many uncertainties. We conclude that impacts with energies less than about 10 Mt are a negligible hazard. For impacts with energies above 10 Mt and below about 10 4 Mt (i.e., impact frequencies less than one in 6 x 10 4 years, corresponding to comets and asteroids with diameters smaller than about 400 rn and 650 m, respectively), blast damage, earthquakes, and fires should be important on a scale of 104 or 105 km 2, which corresponds to the area damaged in many natural disasters of recent history. However, tsunami excited by marine impacts could be more damaging, flooding a kilometer of coastal plain over entire ocean basins. In the energy range of 104-105 Mt (intervals up to 3 x l0 s years, corresponding to comets and asteroids with diameters up to 850 rn and 1.4 km, respectively) water vapor injections and ozone loss become significant on the global scale. In our nominal model, such an impact does not inject enough submicrometer dust into the stratosphere to produce major adverse effects, but if a higher fraction of pulverized rock than we think likely reaches the stratosphere, stratospheric dust (causing global cooling) would also be important in this energy range. Thus l0 s Mt is a lower limit where damage might occur beyond the experience of human history. The energy range from l0 s to 106 Mt (intervals up to 2 x 106 years, corresponding to comets and asteroids up to 1.8 and 3 km diameter) is transitional between regional and global effects. Stratospheric dust, sulfates released from within impacting asteroids, and soot from extensive wildfires sparked by thermal radiation from the impact can produce climatologically significant global optical depths of the order of 10. Moreover, the ejecta plumes of these impacts may produce enough NO from shock-heated air to destroy the ozone shield. Between 10 6 and 10 7 Mt (intervals up to 1.5 x 107 years, corresponding to comets and asteroids up to 4 and 6.5 km diameter), dust and sulfate levels would be high enough to reduce light levels below those necessary for photosynthesis. Ballistic ejecta reentering the atmosphere as shooting stars would set fires over regions exceeding 107 km 2, and the resulting smoke would reduce light levels even further. At energies above 107 Mt, blast and earthquake damage reach the regional scale (106 km2). Tsunami cresting to 100 rn and flooding 20 km inland could sweep the coastal zones of one of the world's ocean basins. Fires would be set globally. Light levels may drop so low from the smoke, dust, and sulfate as to make vision impossible. At energies approaching 10 9 Mt (>108 years) t...
The role of background ionization in the generation and evolution of ultrafine atmospheric particles is developed through modeling and data analysis. It is found that charged molecular clusters condensing around natural air ions can grow significantly faster than corresponding neutral clusters, and thus preferentially achieve stable, observable sizes. Detailed microphysical simulations of this process seem to explain recent measurements of ultrafine particle behavior, as well as the diurnal variation seen in tropospheric mobility spectra. The proposed ion‐mediated nucleation mechanism leads to the production of new particles under conditions that are unfavorable for binary homogeneous nucleation, and provides a consistent explanation for a variety of tropospheric observations.
The potential global atmospheric and climatic consequences of nuclear war are investigated using models previously developed to study the effects of volcanic eruptions. Although the results are necessarily imprecise due to wide range of possible scenaros and uncertainty in physical parameters, the most probable first-order effects are serious. Significant hemispherical attenuation of the solar radiation flux and subfreezing land temperatures may be caused by fine dust raised in high-yield nuclear surface bursts and by smoke from city and forest fires ignited by airbursts of all yields. For many simulated exchanges of several thousand megatons, in which dust and smoke are generated and encircle the earth within 1 to 2 weeks, average light levels can be reduced to a few percent of ambient and land temperatures can reach -15 degrees to -25 degrees C. The yield threshold for major optical and climatic consequences may be very low: only about 100 megatons detonated over major urban centers can create average hemispheric smoke optical depths greater than 2 for weeks and, even in summer, subfreezing land temperatures for months. In a 5000-megaton war, at northern mid-latitude sites remote from targets, radioactive fallout on time scales of days to weeks can lead to chronic mean doses of up to 50 rads from external whole-body gamma-ray exposure, with a likely equal or greater internal dose from biologically active radionuclides. Large horizontal and vertical temperature gradients caused by absorption of sunlight in smoke and dust clouds may greatly accelerate transport of particles and radioactivity from the Northern Hemisphere to the Southern Hemisphere. When combined with the prompt destruction from nuclear blast, fires, and fallout and the later enhancement of solar ultraviolet radiation due to ozone depletion, long-term exposure to cold, dark, and radioactivity could pose a serious threat to human survivors and to other species.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.